Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:30:52.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1.—On the Lower Devonian Fish-Fauna of Campbellton, New Brunswick

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

The Lower Devonian Fish-Fauna of Campbellton, New Brunswick, has already been described by Mr. Whiteaves, of the Canadian Geological Survey, and Dr. Traquair, of Edinburgh; and a few supplementary observations are published in the British Museum Catalogue of Fossil Fishes, Part II. (1891). Much, however, still remains to be learned concerning the skeletal anatomy of the genera and species already determined; and many types of early fishes will doubtless soon be discovered by future explorers of the formation and locality in question. A new series of specimens just received by the British Museum from Mr. R. F. Damon, of Weymouth, adds some small items of interest to our knowledge of the subject; and the following notes relate to the advance thus made. The fossils under discussion were collected last summer by Mr. Jex, and are all much crushed and flattened in the usual manner.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1892

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 Whiteaves, J. F., Canadian Naturalist, n.s. vol. x. (1881), pp. 93100:Google Scholar also Illustrations of the Fossil Fishes of the Devonian Rocks of Canada, Part II.,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, vol. vi. sect. iv. (1889), pp. 9296, pl. ix. pl. x. figs. 2–4.Google Scholar

page 1 note 2 Traquair, R. H., “Notes on the Devonian Fishes of Scaumenac Bay and Campbelltowu in. Canada,” Geol. Mag. [3] Vol. VII. (1890), pp. 2022 Google Scholar; also “On Phlyctænius, a New Genus of Coecosteidæ,” ibid. pp. 55–60, pl. iii.

page 5 note 1 Woodward, A. S., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. [6], vol. viii. (1891), p. 8.Google Scholar