Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:38:29.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pliocene (Tertiary) and Early Pleistocene (Quaternary) Mammalia of East Anglia, Great Britain, in Relation to the Appearance of Man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Henry Fairfield Osborn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In studying the evolution and distribution of the Proboscidea and the arrival of man in Great Britain (Osborn, 1922, 1922a, 1922b), the writer has recently had occasion to review the faunal researches of Lydekker and Newton, and the collection of Mr. A. C. Savin, in connexion with the very interesting question of the geologic correlation of Great Britain with the Upper Pliocene fauna of Europeto the south-east, and of the Scandinavian Glaciation I on the north, with the advent of the northern forest, the boreal, and the Arctic mammal fauna of Great Britain.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 59 , Issue 10 , October 1922 , pp. 433 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, A. Leith,. 1877–1881. “Monograph on the British Fossil Elephants,” pp. 1–265, pls. i–xxviii, 4to, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, C. W., 1922. “Note on a Bear (Ursus savini sp.n.) from the Cromer Forest- Bed”: Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (9), ix, pp. 204–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, W. Boyd,. 1872. “On the Cervidse of the Forest-Bed of Norfolk and Suffolk”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, xxviii, pp. 405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depéret, Charles,. 1890. “Les Animaux Pliocènes du Roussillon”: Mém. Soc. Géol. de France, Paléontologie, Mem. No. 3.Google Scholar
Geikie, Archibald,. 1882. “Text-Book of Geology”: Macmillan & Co., London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Martin A. C., 1902. “Note on the Occurrence of Microtus intermedius in the Pleistocene Deposits of the Thames Valley” (with Gilbert White): Proc. Geol. Assoc, xvii, pp. 414, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Martin A. C., 1907. “On the Existence of the Alpine Vole (Microtus nivalis Martins) in Britain during Pleistocene Times”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., xx, pp. 39–58, pl. i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Martin A. C., 1908. “Note on the Discovery of a Bone of a Monkev in the Norfolk ‘Forest Bed”: Geol. Mag., pp. 440–1, Pl. XXIII.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Martin A. C., 1908 a.Google Scholar
“Note on Gazella daviesii Hinton, an Antelope from the Norwich Crag”:GEOL. MAG., p. 445.Google Scholar
Hinton, Martin A. C., 1909. “On the Fossil Hare of the Ossiferous Fissures of Ightham, Kent, and on the Recent Hares of the Lepus variabilis Group”: Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc., xii, N.S., pp. 225–65, pl. xv.Google Scholar
Hinton, Martin A. C., 1910. “A Preliminary Account of the British Fossil Voles and Lemmings; with some remarks on the Pleistocene Climate and Geography”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxi, pp. 489–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Martin A. C., 1911. “The British Fossil Shrews”: GEOL. MAG., pp. 529–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Martin A. C., 1914. “On some Remains of Rodents from the Red Crag of Suffolk and from the Norfolk Forest-Bed”: Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., (8), xiii, pp. 186–95, pl. viii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leney, Frank., 1902. “A List of the Type, Figured, and Described Fossils in the Norwich Castle Museum”: Geol. Mag., pp. 166–71, 220–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lydekker, Richard., 1886. Appendix to “On a Mandible of Machsærodus from the Forest- Bed” (by James Backhouse): Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., London, xlii, pp. 310–12, pl. x.Google Scholar
Lydekker, Richard., 1886 a. “Note on some Vertebrata from the Red Crag ”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., pp. 364–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lydekker, Richard., 1886 b. Catalogue of the Fossil Mammalia in the British Museum (Natural History), pt. iv.Google Scholar
Lydekker, Richard., 1887. “The Cetacea of the Suffolk Crag”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., London, vol. xliii, pp. 7–18, pl. ii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lydekker, Richard., 1891. “On British Fossil Birds”: The Ibis, (6), iii, pp. 381–410.Google Scholar
Newton, E. T., 1880. “Notes on the Vertebrata of the Pre-Glacial Forest Bed Series of the East of England. Pt. I, Carnivora”: Geol Mag., pp. 152–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, E. T., 1880. “Notes on the Vertebrata…. Pt. II, Carnivora”: Geol Mag., pp. 424–7, pl. xv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, E. T., 1887. “Note on some Recent Additions to the Vertebrate Fauna of the Norfolk Pre-Glacial Forest-Bed”: Geol. Mag., pp. 145–7, Pl. IV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, E. T., 1890. “On some New Mammals from the Red and Norwich Crags”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, xlvi, pp. 444–53, pl. xviii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, E. T., 1890 a. Tables of Fossils. Section I: Fauna and Flora of the Land, Lakes, and Rivers. Table I: Vertebrata. In Clement Reid's “The Pliocene Deposits of Britain”, Appendix I, pp. 225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Henry Fairfield., 1922. “The Pliocene Man of Foxhall in East Anglia”: Nat. Hist., xxi, 1921, pp. 565–76. [Published 1922.]Google Scholar
Osborn, Henry Fairfield., 1922 a. “The Dawn Man of Piltdown, Sussex”: Nat. Hist., pp. 577–90.Google Scholar
Osborn, Henry Fairfield., 1922 b. “Old and New Standards of Pleistocene Division in Relation to the Prehistory of Man in Europe” (with Dr. C. A. Reeds): Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xxxiii.Google Scholar
Prestwich, Joseph., 1871. “On the Structure of the Crag-Beds of Suffolk and Norfolk, with some observations on their Organic Remains. Part I I. The Red Crag of Essex and Sussex”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., London, xxvii, pp. 325–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Clement., 1890. “The Pliocene Deposits of Britain”: Memoirs, Geol. Survey of the United Kingdom.Google Scholar