Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:40:26.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Problem of Batholithic Intrusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Speculation as to the causes of the great intrusions known as batholiths is coeval with petrology as a science. Daly says that batholiths are “the least understood of all the intrusive bodies. If they were truly understood there would be no ‘problem’ of the igneous rocks”.1 This, no doubt, puts the matter too strongly, but there is nevertheless much truth in the statement, and the “problem” is of the greatest importance in petrogenic theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 121 note 1 Daly, R. A., Igneous Rocks and their Origin, New York, 1914, p. 89.Google Scholar

page 122 note 1 U.S. Geol. Surv., chap. vi.Google Scholar

page 122 note 2 For general summaries see: Harker, A., Natural History of the Igneous Rocks, Lond., 1909, chap, iii;Google Scholar Barrell, J., “Marysville Mining District (Montana)”: U.S. Geol. Surv., prof, paper, No. 57, 1907, p. 151 et seq.Google Scholar

page 124 note 1 Op. cit.

page 125 note 1 Barrell, J., “The Status of the Theory of Isostasy”: Amer. Journ. Sci., 1919, vol. xlviii, p. 292.Google Scholar

page 125 note 2 Oldham, B. D., “Support of the Himalayas”: Abs. Proc. Geol. Soc., 1916, No. 985.Google Scholar

page 126 note 1 Richardson, W. A., “The Frequency-Distribution of Igneous Rocks, II”: Min. Mag., March, 1923 (in the press).Google Scholar

page 126 note 2 Op. cit., p. 37.

page 127 note 1 Oldham, R. D., “Structure of the Himalayas”: Mem. Geol. Sun: Ind., Pt, 2, 1917, p. 114 et seq.Google Scholar

page 127 note 2 Daly, op. cit., pp. 91–2.