Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:26:38.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VIII.—A Reply to Prof. Blake's Comments on Inferior Oolite Ammonites 1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

S. S. Buckman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Prof. Blake's book is a valuable work of reference; but the criticisms appear to be both hurried and inaccurate. In the notice of my Monograph the title is incorrectly given: there are certain other clerical errors; and some mistakes which a little more investigation would have prevented.

While placing his comments in brackets, it is unfortunate that Prof. Blake has not found some means to distinguish between remarks based upon the author's words, and statements of his own. This is especially noticeable in the “critical digest” of Haugia, where remarks, which appear as if they originated with Prof. Blake, are really my statements in another form.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , February 1892 , pp. 76 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1892

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The Annals of British Geology, by J. F. Blake, M.A., F.G.S., p. 308, 1891.

References

1 Ceph.; Yorkshire Lias, 1876.

2 Allowance must be made for a slight discrepancy in the drawing of the inner margin in Quenstedt's two figures.