Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:44:38.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cameral Deposits in Orthoconic Nautiloids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Rousseau H. Flower
Rousseau H. Flower
Affiliation:
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous investigations of the cameral deposits of nautiloids are reviewed, with a discussion of their morphology, their distribution in shells, and growth relationships with other shell parts. Cameral deposits are developed commonly in the orders Actinoceratida, Michelinoceratida, Discosorida, and Oncoceratida. While the patterns and growth relationships of cameral and siphonal deposits are specific, and therefore of great potential taxqnomic value, the presence of such structures alone is not a valid basis for the recognition of species or genera.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , April 1955 , pp. 89 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrande, J., 1855. Remplissage organique du siphon dans certains Céphalopodes Paléozoiques. Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. 2, xii, 441–489.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1865–1877. Système Silurien du centre de la Bohême, ii (Céphalopodes). Prague.Google Scholar
Beyrich, E., 1850. Arthrophyllum. Deutsch Geol. Gesellsch., Zeitschr., ii, 10. (Note.—There is no actual title; this discussion, commonly attributed to Beyrich, is an account, written in the third person, of a paper delivered orally by Beyrich; the actual authors are not evident.)Google Scholar
Blake, J. F., 1882. A monograph of the British fossil cephalopods. Part 1. Palaeont. Soc. London, 1–248.Google Scholar
Dahmer, G., 1939. Die Cephalopoden der Oberhartzer Kahlenbergsandstein (Unterdevon). Senckenbergiana, xxi, 338–356.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H., 1936. Cherry Valley Cephalopods. Bull. Amer. Paleont., xxii, no. 76, 1–96.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1939. Study of the Pseudorthoceratidae. Palaeontographica Americana, ii, no. 10, 1–219.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1940. Some Devonian Actinoceroidea. Journ. Paleont., xiv, 442–6.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1941. Revision and internal structure of Leurocycloceras. Amer. Journ. Sci., ccxxxix, 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1943. Studies of Paleozoic Nautiloidea: I. Tissue remnants in the phragmocone of Rayonnoceras. Bull. Amer. Paleont., xxviii, 5–13.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1954. Cambrian cephalopods. New Mexico Bureau Mines, etc., Bull., lx, 1–40.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. and Kummel, B., 1950. A classification of the Nautiloidea. Journ. Paleont., xxiv, 604–616.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W., 1922. Ordovician fossils from North China. Palaeont. Sinica, Ser. B., i, fasc. 1.Google Scholar
Holm, G., 1885. Ueber die innere organisation einiger silurischer Cephalopoden Palaeont. Abh., iii. Heft 1, 1–27.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1936. On the Stereoplasmoceratidae. Japanese Journ. Geol. Geogr., xiii, 230–242.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1936 a. Coreanoceras, one of the most specialized piloceroids and its benthonic adaptation. Japanese Journ. Geol. Geogr., xiii, 187–195.Google Scholar
LeMaitre, D., 1950. Orthocératitidés coralliformes du Dévonien de l' Afrique du Nord. Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. 5, xx, 93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. K., Dunbar, C. O., and Condra, G. E., 1933. The nautiloid cephalopods of the Pennsylvanian system in the mid-continent region. Nebraska Geol. Surv., ser. 2, viii, 1–240.Google Scholar
Roemer, F., 1843. Die Versteinerungen des Harzgebirges. Hanover.Google Scholar
Roemer, F. 1852. Beiträge zur geologischen Kenntniss des nordwestlichen Harzege-birges. Palaeontographica, lx, 1–52, 55–81, 85–111.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R., 1906. Cephalopods of the Beekmantown and Chazy, in the Champlain basin. New York State Mus., Bull., xc, 393–611.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H., 1930. Über die Bewegungsweise der Schalencephalopoden. Palaeont. Zeitschr., xli, 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, H., 1887. Pseudoseptale Bildungen in den Kammern fossilier Cephalopoden. Kgl. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., 164–229.Google Scholar
Teichert, C., 1933. Der Bau der actinoceroiden Cephalopoden. Palaeonto-graphica, lxxvii, Abt. A, 111–230.Google Scholar
Termier, H. and G., , 1950. Paléontologie marocaine. Collection Actualités Scientifiques. Hermann, Paris, ii.Google Scholar
Termier, H. and G., 1950. Sur l'éthologie du genre Lamellorthoceras. Soc. Géol. France, Compte Rendu (1950), 277–8.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S., 1951. On the carboniferous nautiloids: Orthocera gigantea J. Sowerby and allied forms. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., xxii, 169–190.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., Foerste, A. F., Miller, A. K., and Furnish, W. M., 1942. Ozarkian and Canadian Cephalopods. Part I: Nautilicones. Geol. Soc. Amer., Special Papers, xxxvii, 1–157.Google Scholar
Woodward, S. P., 1851–1854. Manual of the Mollusca. London.Google Scholar