Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:52:56.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Contaminated Granite of Bibette Head, Alderney

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

S. R. Nockolds
S. R. Nockolds
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

THE Bibette Head granite outcrops along the western portion of the north coast of Alderney. The outcrop, as seen at present, is about five-eighths of a mile long in an E.-W. direction and about one quarter of a mile wide. The greater part of the intrusion must, however, be under the sea. The rocks into which this granite is intruded are a rather variable series of diorites, and the contact is a sharp one, although there is a certain amount of veining by the granite. Over a large part of the outcrop the granite is much decomposed and reddened. This would appear to be due largely to the action of iron-bearing solutions, derived from the magma, coming up along fissures which are parallel to the main joint planes. These run in a direction 17° west of north. The same series of solutions were probably responsible also for the epidotization of the granite which is a marked feature in various parts. Recent blasting operations at Bibette Head have exposed a large quantity of fresh granite, and although specimens were collected from all over the outcrop the bulk of the material with which the present investigation is concerned came from there.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 69 , Issue 10 , October 1932 , pp. 434 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Hill, E.. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xlv, 1889, 382.Google Scholar
(2)Bonney, T. G. and Hill, E.. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxviii, 1912, 34.Google Scholar
(3)Plymen, G. H.. Trans. La Societe Guernsiaise, 1922, 7 and 13.Google Scholar
(4)Tilley, C. E.. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxvii, 1921, 86.Google Scholar
(5)Alling, H. L.. Journ. Geol., xxix, 1921, 231.Google Scholar
(6)Groves, A. W.. Geol. Mag., LXIV, 1927, table facing p. 464.Google Scholar
(7)Groves, A. W.. Loc. cit., 472.Google Scholar
(8)Osborne, G. D.. Geol. Mag., LXVIII, 1931, 313.Google Scholar
(9)De Lapparent, J.. Bull. Soc. Min. France, xxxvi, 1913, 145.Google Scholar
(10)Clapp, C. H.. Bull. U.S. Geol. Surv., 704, 1921, 115.Google Scholar
(11)Harker, A.. “ Tertiary Igneous Rocks of Skye ”: Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K., 1904, chap. xi.Google Scholar
(12) “ Mull Memoir ”: Mem. Geol. Surv. Scot., 1924, chap, xxxiii.Google Scholar
(13)“ Geology of Arran ”: Mem. Geol. Surv. Scot., 1928, 145–7, 175–8.Google Scholar
(14) “ Geology of Ardnamurchan ”: Mem. Geol. Surv. Scot., 1930, 100–2, 260–2, 337–40.Google Scholar
(15)Sollas, W. J.. Trans. Roy. Irish Acad., xxx, 1894, 477–512.Google Scholar
(16)Sugi, K.. Jap. Journ. Geol. and Geog., viii, 1930–1, 43–52.Google Scholar
(17)Parkinson, J.. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lv, 1899, 430–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)De Lapparent, J.. Loc. cit., 143–72.Google Scholar
(19)Pabst, A.. Univ. California Geol. Bull., xvii, 1928, 325–68.Google Scholar
(20)Wells, A. K. and Wooldridge, S. W.. Proc. Geol. Assoc., xlii, 1931, 182–206.Google Scholar
(21)Sugi, K.. Loc. cit., 52.Google Scholar