Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:31:01.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Eller Beck Formation (Bajocian) of the Ravenscar Group of NE Yorkshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. W. O'B. Knox
R. W. O'B. Knox
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum Downing Street Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The Eller Beck Formation is a thin marine intercalation in a predominantly non-marine Middle Jurassic sequence of coal measures facies. The formation consists of thin transgressive ironstones and siltstones at the base which are overlain by a thicker regressive sequence of shale passing upwards into sandstone. The close association between changes in the local subsidence pattern and the transgression suggest that the incursion resulted from epeirogenic movement rather than from eustatic rise in sea level or a purely sedimentation-controlled change in delta distributary pattern. Facies distribution was greatly affected by local synsedimentary tectonic movement. Water depths were probably very small throughout, and tidal effects on sedimentation minimal.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 110 , Issue 6 , November 1973 , pp. 511 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrow, G. 1877 On a new marine band in the Lower Oolites of East Yorkshire. Geol. Mag. 4, 552–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, R. H. 1967 Stratigraphy and palaeogeography of the Yorkshire Oolites and their relationships with the Lincolnshire Limestone. Bull. Br. Mus. not. Hist. (Geol.) 14, 111–41.Google Scholar
Dingle, R. V. 1971 A marine geological survey off the north-east coast of England (western North Sea). Jl geol. Soc. 127, 303–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Strangways, C. 1892 The Jurassic rocks of Great Britain. Vol. 1, Yorkshire. Mem. geol. Surv. U.K. 551 pp.Google Scholar
Hallimond, A. F. 1925 Iron Ores: Bedded ores of England and Wales: Petrography and chemistry. Mem. geol. Surv. spec. Rep. Miner. Resour. Gt Br. 29, 139 pp.Google Scholar
Häntzschel, W. & Reineck, H. E. Fazies-Untersuchungen im Hettangium von Helmstedt (Niedersachsen). Mitt. geol. St Inst. Hamb. 31, 5–39.Google Scholar
Hemingway, J. E. & Knox, R. W. O'B. Lithostratigraphical terminology of the Middle Jurassic beds of the Cleveland Basin of north-east England. (In press.)Google Scholar
Hudson, J. D. 1962 The stratigraphy of the Great Estuarine Series (Middle Jurassic) of the Inner Hebrides. Trans. Edinb. geol. Soc. 19, 139–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, P. E. 1967 Outline geology of the southern North Sea Basin. Proc. Yorks. geol. Soc. 36, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, R. W. O'B. 1970 Chamosite ooliths from the Winter Gill ironstone (Jurassic) of Yorkshire England. J. sedim. Petrol. 40, 1216–25.Google Scholar
Marley, J. 1857 The Cleveland Ironstone. Trans. N. Engl. Inst. Min. 5, 165–219.Google Scholar
Sellwood, B. W. 1972 Tidal-flat sedimentation in the Lower Jurassic of Bornholm, Denmark. Palaeogeog., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 11, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teichert, C. 1970 Runzelmarken (Wrinkle marks). J. sedim. Petrol. 40, 1056–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vause, J. E. 1959 Underwater geology and analysis of recent sediments off the northwest Florida coast. J. sedim. Petrol. 29, 555–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar