Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:17:58.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Exogenous Contact-zone at Ben Bullen, New South Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Germaine A. Joplin
Germaine A. Joplin
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recently an account of the endogenous contact-zone of the non-magnesian limestones at Ben Bullen was published in this Magazine (Joplin, 1935 a), and it is now proposed to examine the effects of normal contact metamorphism in the aureole of the Ben Bullen plutonic complex.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 72 , Issue 9 , September 1935 , pp. 385 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, F. D., 1929. “The Geology of Ceylon,” Can. Journ. of Research, i, 491–2.Google Scholar
Brown, I. A., 1932. “Late Middle Devonian Diastrophism in South-eastern Australia,” Proc. Linn. Soc., N.S.W., lvii.Google Scholar
Carne, J. E., & Jones, L. J., 1919. “The Limestone Deposits of N.S.W,” Geol. Surv. N.S.W., Min. Res. 25, 315.Google Scholar
Coomaraswamy, A. K., 1902. “The Crystalline Limestones of Ceylon,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lviii, 411.Google Scholar
Crook, T., 1911. “On Dolomitization,” Geol. Mag., VIII, 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullis, C. G., 1899. The Atoll of Funafuti, Royal Society, London, 1904, Section xiv, p. 392.Google Scholar
Du Toit, A. L., 1919. “The Geology of the Marble Delta (Natal),” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxv, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, H. W., & Bradley, W. M., 1914. “On Solid Solutions in Minerals. V: The Isomorphism between Calcite and Dolomite,” Amer. Journ. Sci., xxxvii, 342.Google Scholar
Ford, W. E., 1917. “Studies in the Calcite Group,” Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts and Sci., xxii, 218–219, 230.Google Scholar
Ford, W. E., 1932. Dana’s Textbook of Mineralogy, 518.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. M., 1911. “Die Kontaktmetamorphose im Kristianiagebiet,” Norslce Videnskaps-Akad. Skrift, i, Mat.-Nat. Kl., No. 1.Google Scholar
Harker, A., 1904. “The Tertiary Igneous Rocks of Skye,” Mem. Geol. Surv. United Kingdom, p. 150.Google Scholar
Hatch, F. H., & Rastall, R. H., 1910. “Dedolomitization in the Marble of Port Shepstone (Natal),” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxvi, 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, L., & Smythe, J. A., 1935. “Ankerites of the Northumberland Coalfield,” Min. Mag., xxiv, 65.Google Scholar
Joplin, G. A., 1935 a. “Diorite-Limestone Reaction at Ben Bullen, New South Wales: A Study in Contamination,” Geol. Mag., LXXII, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joplin, G. A., 1935 b. “The Petrology of the Hartley District. Ill: The Contact Metamorphism of the Upper Devonian (Lambian) Series,” Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 1.Google Scholar
Kindle, E. M., 1915. “Limestone Solution on the Bottom of Lake Ontario,” Amer. Journ. Sci., xxxix, 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunitz, W., 1924. “Die Beziehungen zwisehen der chemischen Zusammen-setzung und den physikalisch-optischen Eigenschaften innerhalb der Glimmergruppe,” Neues Jahrb. f. Min., B, Bd. 1, p. 380.Google Scholar
Lacroix, A., 1889. “Contributions à l’étude des gneiss à pyroxene et des roches à wernerite,” Bull Soc. Franc. Min., xii, 237.Google Scholar
Larsen, E. S., & Berman, H., 1934. “The Microscopic Determination of the Nonopaque Minerals,” U.S. Geol. Surv., Bull. 848.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J., 1901. “Notes on the Geology of South-Central Ceylon,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lvii, 205.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. F., 1918. “An American Occurrence of Periclase and its Bearing on the Origin and History of Calcite-Brucite Rocks,” Amer. Journ. Sci., xlvi, 584–5.Google Scholar
Sederholm, J. J., 1916. “On Synantectic Minerals and Related Phenomena,” Bull. de la Comm. Géol. de Finlande, No. 48, 59.Google Scholar
Skeats, E. W., 1903. “The Chemical Composition of Limestones from Upraised Coral Islands, with Notes on their Microscopical Structures,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., xlii, 112.Google Scholar
Skeats, E. W., 1905. “On the Chemical and Mineralogical Evidence as to the Origin of the Dolomite of Southern Tyrol,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxi, 131.Google Scholar
Skeats, E. W., 1918. “The Formation of Dolomite and its Bearing on the Coral Reef Problem,” Amer. Journ. Sci., xlv, 195, 199.Google Scholar
Teall, J. J. H., 1903. “On Dolomitization,” Geol. Mag., X, 513.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. E., 1920. “The Metamorphism of the Pre-Cambrian Dolomites of Southern Eyre Peninsula, South Australia,” Geol. Mag., LVII, 453, 496.Google Scholar
Winchell, A. N., 1927. Elements of Optical Mineralogy, pt. ii, 184.Google Scholar