Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Four samples were sent to me by Mr. A. Farrington, two pairs collected from separate boulder clays, in each of two localities. The purpose was to investigate whether it would be possible to differentiate the two clays by their respective content of microfossils.
1 Farrington, A., 1939. Glacial Geology of South-Eastern Ireland. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 1, 337–344.Google Scholar
1 Wright, J. 1886. Proc. Belfast Nat. Field Club, i, Appendix V, 149–163.Google Scholar
1 These specimens are small, rather variable, and not quite typical, commonly having a small umbilical boss; they may provisionally be referred to N. depressulus.Google Scholar
1 Note that thick specimens were specially sought among the large number on the slides.Google Scholar
1 Fischer de Waldheim, G. 1817. Mém. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou, v, 449. VOL. LXXVII.—No. 4.Google Scholar
1 Davies, L. M., 1932. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edub., lvii, 408.Google Scholar
2 Such translation is Fischer's regular habit in recording most of his genera.Google Scholar
3 d'Orbigny, A. D., 1826. Ann. Sci. Nat., Paris, vii, 275.Google Scholar
4 Sherborn, C. D., 1893–1896. An Index to the Genera and Species of the Foraminifera. Smithsonian Misc. Coll., Nos. 856 and 1031; footnote, p. 380.Google Scholar
5 Fischer de Waldheim, G., 1819. Adversaria Zoologica, fas. ii, 4to. Moscow, p. 75, pl. iii, fig. 5. This is a separate publication which reprinted the article from the periodical.Google Scholar