We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Austin, T., 1860. On the Lower Silurian Rocks in the South-East of Ireland…” The Geologist, iii, 70–3.Google Scholar
Gill, E. D., 1949. Descriptions and Biological Interpretation of Some Victorian Trilobite hypostomes. Proc. R. Soc. Victoria, lxi (new series), 123–131.Google Scholar
Lamont, A., 1939. Notes on Distribution and Migration of Brachiopods in the British and Irish Lower Palaeozoic Faunas. Irish. Nat. Journ., vii, 172–8.Google Scholar
Lamont, A., 1950. Cephalic Segmentation and Sutures in Trilobites. Geol. Mag., lxxxvii, 300–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portlock, J. E., 1843. Geology of the County of Londonderry and of parts of Tyrone and Fermanagh, Dublin.Google Scholar
Richter, R. and , E., 1949. Die Trilobiten der Erdbach-Zone (Kulm) im Rheinischen Schiefergebirge und im Harz. 1. Die GattungPhillibole. Senckenbergiana, xxx, 63–94.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W., 1849. British Organic Remains, decade ii, p1. vii. Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W., 1853. Ditto, decade vii, p1. vi.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W., 1864–1883. Monograph of British Trilobites. Palaeont. Soc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubblefield, C. J., 1950. Remarks on Dr. Lamont's Interpretation of Features in the Trilobite Platycalymene. Geol. Mag., lxxxvii, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D., 1908. Cambrian Geology and Palaeontology, No. 2. Cambrian Trilobites. Smithsonian Misc. Coll., liii, 13–52.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D., 1910. Ditto. No. 6—Olenellus and other genera of the Mesonacidae. Ibid, liii, 231–422.Google Scholar