Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:23:43.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hotspot volcanism close to a passive continental margin: the Canary Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1998

J. C. CARRACEDO
Affiliation:
Estación Volcanológica de Canarias, IPNA, CSIC, La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain Benfield Greig Centre for Hazard Research, University College London, UK
S. DAY
Affiliation:
Benfield Greig Centre for Hazard Research, University College London, UK
H. GUILLOU
Affiliation:
Centre des Faibles Radioactivités, CEA-CNRS, Gif sur Yvette, France
E. RODRÍGUEZ BADIOLA
Affiliation:
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
J. A. CANAS
Affiliation:
ETSICC, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Spain
F. J. PÉREZ TORRADO
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, ULPGC, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain

Abstract

The Canarian Archipelago is a group of volcanic islands on a slow-moving oceanic plate, close to a continental margin. The origins of the archipelago are controversial: a hotspot or mantle plume, a zone of lithospheric deformation, a region of compressional block-faulting or a rupture propagating westwards from the active Atlas Mountains fold belt have been proposed by different authors. However, comparison of the Canarian Archipelago with the prototypical hotspot-related island group, the Hawaiian Archipelago, reveals that the differences between the two are not as great as had previously been supposed on the basis of older data. Quaternary igneous activity in the Canaries is concentrated at the western end of the archipelago, close to the present-day location of the inferred hotspot. This is the same relationship as seen in the Hawaiian and Cape Verde islands. The latter archipelago, associated with a well-defined but slow-moving mantle plume, shows anomalies in a plot of island age against distance which are comparable to those seen in the Canary Islands: these anomalies cannot therefore be used to argue against a hotspot origin for the Canaries. Individual islands in both archipelagoes are characterized by initial rapid growth (the ‘shield-building’ stages of activity), followed by a period of quiescence and deep erosion (erosion gap) which in turn is followed by a ‘post-erosional’ stage of activity. The absence of post-shield stage subsidence in the Canaries is in marked contrast with the major subsidence experienced by the Hawaiian Islands, but is comparable with the lack of subsidence evident in other island groups at slow-moving hotspots, such as the Cape Verdes. Comparison of the structure and structural evolution of the Canary Islands with other oceanic islands such as Hawaii and Réunion reveals many similarities. These include the development of triple (‘Mercedes Star’) rift zones and the occurrence of giant lateral collapses on the flanks of these rift zones. The apparent absence of these features in the post-erosional islands may in part be a result of their greater age and deeper erosion, which has removed much of the evidence for their early volcanic architecture. We conclude that the many similarities between the Canary Islands and island groups whose hotspot origins are undisputed show that the Canaries have been produced in the same way.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)