Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:45:00.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—Cambrian Hyolithidæ, etc., from Hartshill in the Nuneaton District, Warwickshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

E. S. Cobbold
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professor Charles Lap Worth, in his “Sketch of the Geology of the Birmingham District”, gives a list of species (pp. 343 and 349) from “the Hyolite Limestone” and the associated shales as provisionally determined by Miss E. M. R. Wood (Mrs. Shakespeare). He referred the beds generally to the Lower Cambrian and paralleled them approximately with the fossiliferous beds of Comley, the details of which had not then been worked out. The present study of the Hyolithidæ, etc., of Woodlands Quarry, fully confirms the reference to the Lower Cambrian, and it would seem that the position of the Hyolite Limestone in the faunal sequence is near to or a little below that of the Olenellus and Grey Limestones of Comley at the local summit of the Lower Cambrian. The evidence of this is indirect, for no species has yet been identified from both localities, unless it be Micromitra labradorica, Billings sp. Nevertheless, the Hyolithidæ, etc., found in North America that are nearest to, or representative of, those of Hartshill, are there associated more or less intimately with a number of trilobites and brachiopods that find their representatives in the Comley Limestones.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , April 1919 , pp. 149 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 149 note 1 Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xv, pt. ix, 1898Google Scholar.

page 150 note 1 Billings, , Canada Naturalist and Geologist, ser. ii, vol. vi, p. 214Google Scholar.

page 150 note 2 Where the ratios of the diameters are mentioned in this paper it is intended to indicate those of the width to the dorso-ventral diameter.

page 150 note 3 Op. cit., p. 56, pl. i, figs. 28–33.

page 150 note 4 Q.J.G.S., vol. lviii, p. 116, 1902Google Scholar.

page 151 note 1 Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. iii, vol. v, p. 214, figs. 3a–eGoogle Scholar.

page 151 note 2 It seems doubtful whether Eichwald's genus Hyolithus can be used, sens. str., also as a sub-genus.—H. W.

page 151 note 3 Numbers in square brackets are those attached to the blocks on which the specimens are found.

page 151 note 4 Groom, op. cit., 1902, p. 116Google Scholar.

page 151 note 5 Holm, op. cit., 1893, p. 76, pl. v, figs. 29–33Google Scholar.

page 152 note 1 U.S. Geol. Surv., Bull. 10, 1884, p. 20, pl. ii, fig. 5Google Scholar.

page 152 note 2 Holm, op. cit., 1893, p. 78, pl. i, figs. 72–7Google Scholar.

page 152 note 3 id., p. 77, pl. v, figs. 23–8.

page 153 note 1 Böhm, K.. Gesell. der Wissensch., Folge vii, Band iv, No. 4, p. 19, pl. iv, figs. 40–50, 1891Google Scholar.

page 153 note 2 Sil. Syst. de Bohème, vol. iii, p. 5, pl. x, figs. 22–9, 1867Google Scholar.

page 153 note 3 Can. Naturalist and Geologist, n.s., vol. vi, p. 216, 1872Google Scholar.

page 153 note 4 id., p. 471.

page 153 note 5 Billings, , op. cit., 1872, p. 215Google Scholar.

page 156 note 1 Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci., vol. xiv, p. 131, 1895Google Scholar.

page 156 note 2 Op. cit., p. 631, 1900Google Scholar.