Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:19:18.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—A Collection of Egyptian Fossil Echinoidea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. W. Gregory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The first collection of Egyptian fossils sent for determination by Captain Lyons, R.E., Director of the Egyptian Geological Survey, to the British Museum, includes an interesting series of Echinoidea, which has been intrusted to me for examination. It is hardly necessary to state that our knowledge of the fossil echinid faunas of Egypt is mainly due to M. P. de Loriol-le-Fort, who has described a large series in two admirable monographs.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , April 1898 , pp. 149 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1898

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 149 note 1 de Loriol, P., “ Monographie des Échinides contenus dans les couches nummulitiques de l'Egypte”: Mém. Soc. Phys. Hist. nat. Genève, vol. xxvii (1881), pp. 59–148, 11 pis.Google Scholar “Eocaene Echinuideen aus Aegypten und der libyschen “Wüste”: Beitr. Geol. Pal. libysch. Wüste, Abth. ii, Ht. 1, Palæontogr. Suppl., 1883, pp. 1–59, 11 pis.Google Scholar

page 151 note 1 Cidaris itala, Laube, G. C., “ Ech. vicent. Tert. Geb. ”: Denk. Ak. ”SViss. Wien, vol. xxix, pt. 2 (1869), p. 9, pl. i, fig. 3.Google Scholar

page 151 note 2 De Loriol, , 1883, Beitr. libysch. Wüste, vol. ii, pt. 1, p. 8, pl. i, figs. 1, 11.Google Scholar

page 151 note 3 Cidarites Schmidelii, Münster, in Goldfuss, Petref. Germ., vol. i, p. 120, pi. xl, fig. 4.Google Scholar De Loriol, , 1883, op. cit., p. 9, pi. i, fig. 10.Google Scholar

page 151 note 4 Peron, & Gauthier, , Ech. foss. Algér., vol. iii, fasc. 10 (1891), p. 252, pi. v, figs. 1–4.Google Scholar

page 152 note 1 Pomel, , “Pal. Algér.,” Zooph., fasc. 2, Ech., livr. 1 (1885), pl. C, xii, figs. 1–4.Google Scholar

page 152 note 2 Ibid., pl. C, xii, figs. 5–8.

page 152 note 3 Ibid., pl. C, xi, figs. 5–8.

page 152 note 4 Fuchs, , “Tert. Ech. Persien”: Sitz. Ak. Wiss. Wien, vol. lxxxi, pt. 1 (1880), p. 99. pl., figs. 6–16.Google Scholar

page 152 note 5 Pomel, , op. cit., pl. C, x, figs. 1–7.Google Scholar

page 153 note 1 Agassiz, A., Revision Echini, pt. iii (1873), p. 517.Google Scholar

page 153 note 2 Ibid., p. 518.

page 153 note 3 Agassiz, L. and Desor, , “ Cat. Raiss.”: Ann. Sci. nat., vol. vii (1847), p. 132.Google Scholar

page 153 note 4 Agassiz, L., Mon. Scut., p. 111, pl. xxiii, figs. 13, 14.Google Scholar

page 153 note 5 Cf. ibid., pl. xxiii, figs. 1–3.

page 153 note 6 Scutella Paulensis, Agassiz, L., Monogr. Scutelles, 1841, p. 83, pl. xix, figs. 8–10.Google Scholar

page 154 note 1 e.g. Depéret, , “Classification et parallelisme du Système Miocène”: Bull. Soc. geol. France, ser. 3, vol. xxi (1893), p. 176.Google Scholar

page 154 note 2 Fuchs, , Beitr. libysch. Wüste, vol. i (1883), p. 48, pl. xvii, figs. 4–6.Google Scholar

page 154 note 3 Fuchs, ibid., p. 48, pl. xiv, figs. 1–4.

page 154 note 4 From milvus, ‘ a kite,” the test being kite-shaped.

page 155 note 1 Cotteau, G., “Descr. Ech. tert. St. Barth. et Anguilla”: Handl. k. Svens. Vet. Akad., vol. xiii, No. 9 (1875), p. 24, pl. iv, figs. 5–8.Google Scholar

page 155 note 2 Pomel, A., “Ech. Kef. Ighoud”: Mat. Carte geol. Algerie, ser. i, Pal. (1885), p. 26, pl. iii, figs. 12–14.Google Scholar

page 158 note 1 Fuchs, , “ Tert. Ech. Persien ”: Sitz. Ak. Wiss. Wien, vol. Ixxxi, pt. 1 (1880), p. 100, pi., figs. 17–20.Google Scholar

page 159 note 2 Cotteau, G., “ faune terr. tert. Corse ”: Ann. Soc. Agric. Lyons, ser. 4, vol. ix, pp. 310–12.Google Scholar