No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
III.—Fossil Mammalia from Egypt. Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
In addition to the remains of the large Anthracotheriod (Brachyodus africanus) described in the first part of this paper (Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. VI, 1899, p. 481), the collection of mammalian bones from the Lower Miocene of Moghara also includes portions of the skeleton of a small rhinoceros. Unfortunately this is very poorly represented, there being only an incomplete scapula and an atlas vertebra, and in the absence of any portion of the skull or teeth it is impossible to determine the species to which it may have belonged. As was pointed out in Part I, the age of the deposit is Burdigalien (Lowest Miocene), and it is therefore contemporary with the Sables de I’Orléanais and the fresh-water deposits of Eggenburg. From the latter no rhinoceros remains are recorded, but from the former several species seem to have been obtained. Of these only one, Aceratherium aurelianense, has been described and figured.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1900
References
page 401 note 1 Palaeontol. Mittheilung., 1862, p. 22.Google Scholar
page 402 note 1 Nouel, , “Mémoire sur un nouveau Rhinocéros fossile,” pls. i–v: Mém. de la Société d’agriculture, sciences, belles-lettres, et arts d’Orleans, viii, 1866, p. 241Google Scholar.
page 402 note 2 Gervais, : “Zool. et Pal. générales,” ser. i (1867–1869), p. 157Google Scholar.
page 402 note 3 Mermier, , “Sur la découverte d’une nouvello espèce d’Acerotherium” : Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon., tom. xlii (1895), p. 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also, op. cit., tom. xliii (1896), pp. 225 and 257.Google Scholar