No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Étel is situated on the west of the Megalithic district of which Carnae is the centre. It stands about 2 kilometres from the sea on the Rivière d'Étel. This so-called river is really an arm of the sea, which drains the extensive estuarine basin to the north-east, which is, in its way, almost another Morbihan (Little Sea) similar to the well-known one farther east. The tide rushes into the latter at a rate of from 7 to 11 knots per hour, at neap and spring tides respectively, and its ingress into and egress from the Rivière d'Étel cannot be much less. M. P. Le Strat, who has been much at sea in different parts of the world, considered that the incoming tide was rushing in at a rate of 7 or 8 knots an hour under the bridge of Lorrois, where the river narrows, when we passed it on October 11, 1909. The channel of the Rivière d'Étel is thus kept permanently open, and ships of from 50 to 150 tons are engaged in the tunny fishery and smaller boats in the sardine trade. Messrs. Peneau have a sardine-curing establishment at La Magoire, just opposite, across the river (Diagram, Text-fig. 1, p. 7).
page 8 note 1 Note explicative, Sheet 88, Carte Géologique détaillée de Bretagne. Note explicative, Sheet 89, Carte Géol. det. “Cette granulite … continue de Port-Louis à la Rivière d'Auray.” Mr. F. H. Butler points out that the French ‘granulite’ is equivalent to the fine-grained muscovite-biotite granite of English petrologists (vide Harker, Petrology for Students).
page 8 note 2 Ibid.
page 9 note 1 See Prestwich, , Geology, vol. xi, p. 525Google Scholar; Q.J.G.S., 1892, vol. xlviii, p. 304Google Scholar. Also “Les Megalithes submergés des Côtes de Vendée”, par DrBaundouin, Marcel: L'Homme Préhistorique, 1er Mai, 1905, No. v, pp. 130–48.Google Scholar
page 10 note 1 Prestwich, , Q.J.G.S., vol. xlviii, p. 282.Google Scholar
page 11 note 1 Coste, , Flore de la France, iii, p. 562.Google Scholar
page 12 note 1 “Notes sur les associations végétales maritimes”: Niort. Bull. Soc. Bot. des deux Sèvres, 1902 (1903), xiv, pp. 242–50.Google Scholar
page 13 note 1 Perhaps these should be excluded as they were probably killed by fishermen, but they show the possibility of such material floating ashore.
page 15 note 1 Proc. Malac. Soc., vol. viii, pp. 247 and 374.Google Scholar