No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Since the researches of Heer into the Miocene Flora of Switzerland have invested the theory of a Tertiary Atlantis with some degree of probability, other observers have come forward with arguments on the one hand which lend support to that hypothesis; whilst on the other hand it has been attempted to prove that the facts (as to the presumed migrations of plants and animals) are to be accounted for rather by a connection between Europe and America through the Asiatic region. My examination of the Jamaican fossils first led me to support a modification of the original view taken by Heer, and in April, 1866, I communicated to the Geological Society a paper bearing on the subject. That paper was read on the 20th of June, 1866, and an abstract of it appeared in the August number of this Magazine. I propose, on the Present occasion, to make a few remarks on the probility of the former connection between the eastern and western shores of the Atlantic.
page 496 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxii., p. 281.Google Scholar
page 496 note 2 Vol. III. p. 373. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. xxii., p. 570.Google Scholar
page 496 note 3 Manual of Geology, p. 587.Google Scholar
page 497 note 1 Dana, , op. cit., pp. 531, 532; and Lyell, Principles, 8th ed., p. 121.Google Scholar
page 498 note 1 See Maury, , Phys. Geogr. of the Sea (1858), pp. 254, 263.Google Scholar
page 498 note 2 The shell from San Domingo, in the British Museum, labelled Venus circinaria, is not that species, but more probably Venus rigida (V. rugosa).
page 499 note 1 Ann. and Mag. N.H., 3 ser., vol. 18, p. 387 (11. 1866).Google Scholar