Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:12:32.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The middle lower Cambrian (Ovetian) Lunagraulos n. gen. from Spain and the oldest trilobite records

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2015

ELADIO LIÑÁN ,
JOSÉ ANTONIO GÁMEZ VINTANED  and
RODOLFO GOZALO
ELADIO LIÑÁN
Affiliation:
Área de Paleontología, Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
JOSÉ ANTONIO GÁMEZ VINTANED
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Faculty of Geosciences & Petroleum Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas (UTP), Bandar Seri Iskandar, 32610 Tronoh (Perak), Malaysia
RODOLFO GOZALO*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geología, Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner 50, E-46100 Burjassot, Spain
*
§Author for correspondence: Rodolfo.Gozalo@uv.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The type material of Agraulos antiquus Sdzuy, 1961 from the La Herrería Formation, northern Spain, is revised together with additional material and included in the new genus Lunagraulos. The stratigraphical range of Lunagraulos antiquus (Sdzuy, 1961) – occurring below that of the trilobite species of the genera Lunolenus, Metadoxides and Dolerolenus in the type locality of Los Barrios de Luna in the province of León, northern Spain – and the accompanying ichnofossil assemblage demonstrate an Ovetian age (lower part of Cambrian Stage 3, currently being discussed by the International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy) for this species. Moreover, the trilobite Lunagraulos tamamensis n. gen. n. sp. is found in the Tamames Sandstone near the village of La Rinconada in the province of Salamanca, central Spain. The biostratigraphical position of this new taxon and its accompanying ichnoassemblage is also analysed and assigned to the lowermost Ovetian Stage. The genus Lunagraulos is therefore the oldest agraulid found in the fossil record. The exceptional presence of Lunagraulos in a marine coarse siliciclastic succession – a facies rather typical for the ichnofossils Cruziana and Rusophycus, some of the oldest signs of trilobite activity – suggests that first trilobite representatives may have inhabited high- to middle-energy, marine environments. This hypothesis may also explain both the taxonomic and biostratigraphic heterogeneity of the first trilobite genera appearing across the world, due to preservation problems in this type of facies. Comparison of the Lunagraulos biostratigraphy with other coeval Spanish fossil assemblages allows us to propose its intercontinental correlation with the oldest records of currently known trilobites.

Keywords

trilobitetrace fossilsIberian MassifSpainbiostratigraphyCambrian Series 2intercontinental correlation
Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 152 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 1123 - 1136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlberg, P. 1984. Lower Cambrian trilobites and biostratigraphy of Scandinavia. Lund Publications in Geology 22, 1–37.Google Scholar
Ahlberg, P. & Bergström, J. 1993. The trilobite Calodiscus lobatus from the Lower Cambrian of Scania, Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 115, 331–4. doi: 10.1080/11035899309453923.Google Scholar
Ahlberg, P., Bergström, J. & Johansson, J. 1986. Lower Cambrian olenellid trilobites from the Baltic Faunal Province. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 108, 39–56. doi: 10.1080/11035898609453745.Google Scholar
Aramburu, C., Arbizu, M., Gutiérrez Marco, J. C., Méndez-Bedia, I., Rábano, I. & Truyols, J. 1996. Primera identificación de materiales del Ordovícico Medio en la sección de Los Barrios de Luna (Zona Cantábrica, noroeste de España). Geogaceta 20, 7–10.Google Scholar
Aramburu, C. (coord.), Bernárdez, R., Gozalo, R., Gutiérrez-Marco, J. C. & Liñán, E. 2006. XXII Jornadas de la Sociedad Española de Paleontología. Excursión B. Paleontología y Estratigrafía del Paleozoico Inferior en Los Barrios de Luna. Universidad de León, Secretariado de Publicaciones, León, 79 pp.Google Scholar
Bengtson, S., Conway Morris, S., Cooper, B. J., Jell, P. A. & Runnegar, B. N. 1990. Early Cambrian fossils from South Australia. Association of Australasian Paleontologists Memoir 9, 1–364.Google Scholar
Bergström, J. 1981. Lower Cambrian shelly faunas and biostratigraphy in Scandinavia. In Short Papers for the Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System (ed. Taylor, M. E.), pp. 22–5. US Geological Survey. Open-File Report, 81–743.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O. 1992. El Cámbrico de Sudamérica. In Paleozoico Inferior de Ibero-América (eds Gutiérrez-Marco, J. C., Saavedra, J. & Rábano, I.), pp. 69–84. Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Cáceres.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O. 2003. Review of the Cambrian Stratigraphy of the Argentine Precordillera. Geologica Acta, 1, 11–21.Google Scholar
Bornemann, J. G. 1891. Die Versteinerungen des Cambrisches Schichtensystems der Insel Sardinien, nebst vergleichenden Untersuchungen über analoge Vorkommnisse aus anderen Ländern. Nova Acta der Ksl. Leopoldino-Carolinae Deutschen Akademie Naturforscher 56, 425–529.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1989. Towards a biostratigraphy of the earliest skeletal biotas. In The Precambrian–Cambrian Boundary (eds Cowie, J. & Brasier, M. D.), pp. 117–65. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, no. 12.Google Scholar
Cabanás, G. 1966. Notas estratigráficas de la provincia de Córdoba. Con una nota sobre un nuevo fósil del Cambriano por Bermudo Meléndez. Notas y Comunicaciones del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España 90, 77–84.Google Scholar
Chang, W.-T. 1963. A classification of the Lower and Middle Cambrian trilobites from north and northeastern China, with description of new families and genera. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 11, 447–87 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Cobbold, E. S. 1935. Lower Cambrian Faunas from Hérault, France. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 10, 16, 25–48.Google Scholar
Comte, P. 1937 a. La série cambrienne et silurienne du León (Espagne). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 204, 604–6.Google Scholar
Comte, P. 1937 b. Les grès rouges de San Pedro (León, Espagne). Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord 62 (13), 60–8.Google Scholar
Comte, P. 1938. La succession lithologique des formations cambriennes du León (Espagne). LXXI Congrès de la Societé des Savants, Nice 1938, Section Sciences, 181–3.Google Scholar
Comte, P. 1959. Recherches sur les terrains anciens de la Cordillère Cantabrique. Memorias del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España 60, 1–440.Google Scholar
Courtessole, R. & Jago, J. B. 1980. Biostratigraphie du Cambrien inferieur du Cabardes (versant sud de la Montagne Noire, France Méridionale). Mémoire de la Société d’Études Scientifiques de l’Aude, 1–26.Google Scholar
Crimes, T. P. & Anderson, M. M. 1985. Trace fossils from Late Precambrian–Early Cambrian strata of southeastern Newfoundland (Canada): Temporal and environmental implications. Journal of Paleontology 59, 310–43.Google Scholar
Crimes, T. P., Legg, I., Marcos, A. & Arboleya, M. L. 1977. Late Precambrian-low Lower Cambrian trace fossils from Spain. In Trace Fossils 2 (eds Crimes, T. P. & Harper, J. C.), pp. 91–138. Geological Journal, Special Issue no. 9.Google Scholar
Díez Balda, M. A. 1986. El complejo Esquisto-grauváquico, las series paleozoicas y la estructura hercínica al Sur de Salamanca. Acta Salmanticensia, Sección de Ciencias 52, 1–162.Google Scholar
Díez Balda, M. A. & Fournier Viñas, C. 1981 . Hallazgo de acritarcos en el complejo Esquistograuváquico al Sur de Salamanca. Acta Geológica Hispánica 16, 131–4.Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I. 1983. Novie nizhnekembrijskie trilobiti yugo-vostoka Sibirskoi platformi. (New Lower Cambrian trilobites from the southeastern part of the Siberian Platform.) Paleontologicheskij Zhurnal 1983 (3), 59–64 (in Russian); Paleontological Journal 17, 57–63.Google Scholar
Elicki, O. 1997. Biostratigraphic data of the German Cambrian – present state of knowledge. Freiberger Forschungshefte C466, 155–65.Google Scholar
Frech, F. 1897. Lethaea Geognostica, Teil 1. Lethaea Palaeozoica 2, 1–256.Google Scholar
Gámez Vintaned, J. A., Liñán, E., Mayoral, E., Dies, M. E., Gozalo, R. & Muñiz, F. 2006 a. Trace and soft body fossils from the Pedroche Formation (Ovetian, Lower Cambrian of Sierra de Córdoba, S Spain) and their relation to the Pedroche event. Geobios 39, 443–68. doi: 10.1016/j.geobios.2005.04.004.Google Scholar
Gámez Vintaned, J. A., Liñán, E., Mayoral, E., Gozalo, R. & Zamora, S. 2006 b. Icnofósiles por encima del tránsito Precámbrico/Cámbrico en Los Barrios de Luna (Zona Cantábrica, España). In XXII Jornadas de la Sociedad Española de Paleontología y Simposios de los Proyectos PICG 493, 503, 499 y 467. Libro de Resúmenes (ed. Fernández-Martínez, E.), pp. 205–8. Universidad de León, Secretariado de Publicaciones, León.Google Scholar
García de Figuerola, L. C. & Martínez García, E. 1972. El Cámbrico Inferior de la Rinconada (Salamanca, España Central). Stvdia Geologica 3, 33–41.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1990. Revised Lower to Lower Middle Cambrian biostratigraphy of Morocco. Newsletter on Stratigraphy 22, 53–70.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. & Landing, E. 2006. Edicaran–Cambrian depositional environments and stratigraphy of the western Atlas regions. Beringeria, Special Issue 6, 47–112.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. & Shergold, J. H. 2000. The quest for internationally recognized divisions of Cambrian time. Episodes 23, 188–95.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, F. 1982. Membro arenito-conglomerático da parte superior do Cámbrico de Elvas. Memórias da Academia das Ciências de Lisboa, Classe de Ciências 24, 33–9.Google Scholar
Gozalo, R., Liñán, E., Palacios, T., Gámez Vintaned, J. A. & Mayoral, E. 2003. The Cambrian of the Iberian Peninsula: An overview. Geologica Acta 1, 103–12. doi 10.1344/105.000001596.Google Scholar
Gubanov, A. P. 2002. Early Cambrian palaeogeography and the probable Iberia-Siberia connection. Tectonophysics 352, 153–68.Google Scholar
Hawle, I. & Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. Praha: Calve'sche Buchhandlung, 176 pp.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 2005 a. The earliest occurrence of trilobites and brachiopods in the Cambrian of Laurentia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 220, 153–65. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.08.008.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 2005 b. The earliest trilobite in the Lower Cambrian of Western Laurentia and a suggested correlation for the base of a “Trilobite-Bearing” Series. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 22 (supplement), 59–60.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 2007. Fallotaspidoid trilobite assemblage (Lower Cambrian) from the Esmeralda Basin (western Nevada, U.S.A.): The oldest trilobites from Laurentia. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 33, 123–40.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 2008. The first trilobites in Laurentia and elsewhere. In Advances in Trilobite Research (eds Rábano, I., Gozalo, R. & García Bellido, D.), pp. 171–7. Cuadernos del Museo Geológico y Minero, no. 9. Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España.Google Scholar
Hupé, P. 1953. Contributions à l’étude du Cambrien inferieur et du Précambrien III de L’Anti-Atlas marocain. Notes et Memoires du Service Géologique du Maroc 103, 1–402.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A. 2003. Phylogeny of Early Cambrian Trilobites. Special Papers in Palaeontology 70, 54–7.Google Scholar
Jensen, S., Palacios, T. & Martí Mus, M. 2010. Revised biochronology of the Lower Cambrian of the Central Iberian zone, southern Iberian massif, Spain. Geological Magazine 147, 690–703. doi: 10.1017/S0016756809990677.Google Scholar
Julivert, M., Fontboté, J. M., Ribeiro, A. & Nabais Conde, L. E. 1972. Mapa Tectónico de la Península Ibérica y Baleares. 1:1.000.000. Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, 113 pp.Google Scholar
Landing, E., Geyer, G., Brasier, M. D. & Bowring, S. A. 2013. Cambrian evolutionary radiation: context, correlation, and chronostratigraphy. Overcoming deficiencies of the first appearance datum (FAD) concept. Earth-Science Reviews 123, 133–72.Google Scholar
Landing, E., Peng, S., Babcock, L. E., Geyer, G. & Moczydlowska-Vidal, M. 2007. Global standard names for the Lowermost Cambrian Series and Stage. Episodes 30, 287–9.Google Scholar
Lermontova, E. V. 1940. Arthropoda. In Atlas of the Leading Forms of the Fossil Faunas of the USSR. 1. Cambrian (eds Vologdin, A., Lermontova, E., Yavorsky, B. & Janischevsky, M.), pp. 112–93. Gosgeolizdat, Moskva–Leningrad (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lin, H. 2008. Chapter 3. Early Cambrian (Chiungchussuan, Tsanglangpuan and Lungwangmia). In Trilobite Record of China (eds Zhou, Z. & Zhen, Y.), pp. 36–76. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Liñán, E., Dies, M. E., Gámez Vintaned, J. A., Gozalo, R., Mayoral, E. & Muñiz, F. 2005. Lower Ovetian (Lower Cambrian) trilobites and biostratigraphy of the Pedroche Formation (Sierra de Córdoba, southern Spain). Geobios 38, 365–81. doi: 10.1016/j.geobios.2003.11.007.Google Scholar
Liñán, E. & Gámez-Vintaned, J. A. 1993. Lower Cambrian palaeogeography of the Iberian Peninsula and its relations with some neighbouring European areas. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 164, 831–42.Google Scholar
Liñán, E., Gámez Vintaned, J. A., Gozalo, R., Dies, M. E. & Mayoral, E. 2006. Events and biostratigraphy in the Lower Cambrian of Iberia. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 157, 597–609.Google Scholar
Liñán, E., Gozalo, R., Dies Álvarez, M. E., Gámez Vintaned, J. A., Mayoral, E., Chirivella Martorell, J. B., Esteve, J., Zamora, J., Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Andrés, J. A. 2008 a. Fourth International Trilobite Conference Trilo 08. Toledo, Spain, 2008. Post-Conference Field Trip. Lower and Middle Cambrian Trilobites of Selected Localities in Cadenas Ibéricas (NE Spain). Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, 52 pp.Google Scholar
Liñán, E., Gozalo, R., Dies Álvarez, M. E., Gámez Vintaned, J. A. & Zamora, S. 2008 b. Nuevos trilobites del Ovetiense inferior (Cámbrico Inferior bajo) de Sierra Morena (España). Ameghiniana 45, 123–38.Google Scholar
Liñán, E., Gozalo, R., Palacios, T., Gámez Vintaned, J. A., Ugidos, J. M. & Mayoral, E. 2002. Cambrian. In The Geology of Spain (eds Gibbons, W. & Moreno, T.), pp. 17–29. London: The Geological Society.Google Scholar
Liñán, E., Perejón, A., Gozalo, R., Moreno-Eiris, E. & Oliveira, J. T. de 2004. The Cambrian System in Iberia. Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, no. 3.Google Scholar
Liñán, E., Perejón, A. & Sdzuy, K. 1993. The Lower–Middle Cambrian stages and stratotypes from the Iberian Peninsula: a revision. Geological Magazine 130, 817–33.Google Scholar
Liñán, E. & Sdzuy, K. 1978. A trilobite from the Lower Cambrian of Córdoba (Spain) and its stratigraphical significance. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 59 (4/6), 387–99.Google Scholar
Liñán Guijarro, E. 1978. Bioestratigrafía de la Sierra de Córdoba. Granada: Tesis Doctorales de la Universidad de Granada, vol. 191, 212 pp.Google Scholar
Lotze, F. 1945. Zur Gliederung der Varisziden der Iberischen Meseta. Geotektonische Forschungen 6, 78–92.Google Scholar
Lotze, F. 1961. Das Kambrium Spaniens. Teil I: Stratigraphie. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Abhandlungen der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1961 (6), 283–498 (1–216).Google Scholar
Lu, Y.-H. 1941. Lower Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobite fauna of Kunming, Yunnan. Geological Society of China Bulletin 21, 71–90 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Martín Herrero, D., Ugidos Meana, J. M., Nozal Martín, F. & Pardo Alonso, M. V. 1990. Mapa Geológico de España. Escala 1:50.000. Tamames (527). 2nd edition. Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, 95 pp.Google Scholar
Meneghini, G. 1881. Fauna primordiale in Sardegna. Atti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, Transunti, series 3, 5, 305–7.Google Scholar
Moczydlowska, M. 1991. Acritarch biostratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian and the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary in southeastern Poland. Fossils and Strata 29, 1–127.Google Scholar
Moreno, F., Vegas, R. & Marcos, A. 1976. Sobre la edad de las series ordovícicas y cámbricas relacionadas con la discordancia ‘Sárdica’ en el anticlinal de Valdelacasa (Montes de Toledo, España). Breviora Geológica Astúrica 20, 8–16.Google Scholar
Palacios, T., Gámez Vintaned, J. A., Fernández-Remolar, D. & Liñán, E. 1999. The lowermost Cambrian in the Valdelacasa Anticline (central Spain): some new palaeontological data. Journal of Conference Abstracts 4 (3, XV RGOP Abstract Volume), 1017.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. & Gatehouse, C. G. 1972. Early and Middle Cambrian trilobites from Antarctica. US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 456-D, 1–37.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. & Rowell, A. J. 1995. Early Cambrian Trilobites from the Shackleton Limestone of the Central Transantarctic Mountains. The Paleontological Society Memoir 45, 1–28.Google Scholar
Pegel, T. V. 2000. Evolution of trilobite biofacies in Cambrian basins of the Siberian Platform. Journal of Paleontology 74, 1000–19.Google Scholar
Peng, S. 2003. Chronostratigraphic Subdivision of the Cambrian of China. Geologica Acta 1, 135–44. doi: 10.1344/105.000001600.Google Scholar
Peng, S. & Babcock, L. E. 2001. Cambrian of the Hunan-Guizhou region, South China. In Cambrian System of South China (eds Peng, S., Babcock, L. E. & Zhu, M.). Palaeoworld 13, 3–51.Google Scholar
Perejón, A. 1986. Bioestratigrafía de los Arqueociatos en España. Cuadernos de Geología Ibérica 9 (year 1984), 213–316.Google Scholar
Perejón, A. 1989. Arqueociatos del Ovetiense en la sección del Arroyo Pedroche, Sierra de Córdoba, España. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural (Geología) 84, 143–247.Google Scholar
Perejón, A. 1994. Palaeogeographic and biostratigraphic distribution of Archaeocyatha in Spain. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg 172, 341–54.Google Scholar
Perejón, A., Fröhler, M., Bechstädt, T., Moreno-Eiris, E. & Boni, M. 2000. Archaeocyathan assemblages from the Gonnesa Group, Lower Cambrian (Sardinia Italy) and their sedimentologic context. Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 39, 257–91.Google Scholar
Perejón, A. & Moreno-Eiris, E. 2006. Biostratigraphy and paleobiogeography of the archaeocyaths on the southwestern margin of Gondwana. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 157, 611–28.Google Scholar
Pillola, G. L. 1991. Trilobites du Cambrien inférieur du SW de la Sardaigne, Italie. Palaeontographia Italica, 78, 1–173.Google Scholar
Pillola, G. L. 1993. The Lower Cambrian trilobite Bigotina and allied genera. Palaeontology 36, 855–81.Google Scholar
Pillola, G. L., Gámez-Vintaned, J. A., Dabard, M. P., Leone, F., Liñán, E. & Chauvel, J.-J. 1994. The Lower Cambrian ichnospecies Astropolichnus hispanicus: palaeoenvironment and palaeogeographical significance. In Studies on Ecology and Palaeoecology of Benthic Communities (eds Matteucci, R., Carboni, M. G. & Pignatti, J. S.), pp. 253–67. Bolletino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana, Special Volume no. 2.Google Scholar
Pillola, G. L., Leone, F. & Loi, A. 1995. The Lower Cambrian Nebida Group of Sardinia. Rediconti del Seminario della Facoltà di Scienze dell’Università di Cagliari 65, 27–60.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1913. Notes on some old and new trilobites in the Victoria Memorial Museum, Canada, Geological Survey. Bulletin of the Victoria Memorial Museum 1, 33–39.Google Scholar
Repina, L. N. 1969. Trilobity nizhnego i srednego kembriya Yuga Sibiri (nadsemeystvo Redlichioidea). Chast II. Trudy Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie Akademie Nauk SSSR 67, 3–110 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Repina, L. N. 1981. Trilobite biostratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian Stages in Siberia. In Short Papers for the Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System 1981 (ed. Taylor, M. E.), pp. 173–80. US Geological Survey, Open-File Report, 81–743.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Alonso, M. D., Alonso Gavilán, G., Liñán, E., Gámez-Vintaned, J. A. & Pérez García, P. P. 1995. Transversal Salamanca-Tamames-Peña de Francia-Monsagro-S Ciudad Rodrigo (Spain). Neoproterozoic-Cambrian transition (Aldeatejada Fm, Tamames Sandstone Fm and the Schist Greywacke Complex in Monsagro-S of Ciudad Rodrigo). In XIII Geological Meeting on the West of the Iberian Peninsula (eds Rodríguez Alonso, M. D. & Alonso Gavilán, G.), pp. 13–52. Signo, S. L., Salamanca, 27–30 September 1995.Google Scholar
Rölz, P. 1975. Beiträge zum Aufbau des jungpräkambrischen und altpaläozoischen Grundgebirges in den Provinzen Salamanca und Cáceres (Sierra de Tamames, Sierra de Francia und östliche Sierra de Gata) Spanien (Auszug). Münstersche Forschungen zur Geologie und Paläontologie 36, 1–68.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1961. Das Kambrium Spaniens. Teil II: Trilobiten. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1961 (7–8), 499–690 (217–408).Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1971. Acerca de la correlación del Cámbrico Inferior en la Península Ibérica. I Congreso Hispano-Luso-Americano de Geología Económica, Sección 1 Geología 2, 753–68.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1978. The Precambrian-Cambrian beds in Morocco (Preliminary Report). Geological Magazine 115 (2), 83–94.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1981. Der Beginn des Phanerozoikums-Paläobiologische und Stratigraphische Probleme. Natur und Museum 111, 390–8.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1987. Trilobites de la base de la formación del Jalón (Cámbrico inferior) de Aragón. Revista Española de Paleontología 2, 3–8.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1970. Cruziana stratigraphy of ‘non-fossiliferous’ Palaeozoic sandstones. In Trace Fossils (eds Crimes, T. P. & Harper, J. C.), pp. 447–76. Liverpool: Seel House Press. Geological Journal Special Issue no. 3.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. & Gamez-Vintaned, J. A. 1995. Psammichnites gigas: Ichnological expression of the Cambrian explosion. In Proceedings of the Sixth Paleobenthos International Symposium (ed. Cherchi, A.), pp. 151–2. Cagliari: Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Cagliari. Alghero, 28–30 October 1995.Google Scholar
Suvorova, N. P. 1960. Trilobity Kembrija vostoka sibirskoj platformy 2, Olenellidy –Granulariidy. Trudi Paleontologicheskogo Instituta, Akademija Nauk SSSR 84, 1–238.Google Scholar
Torell, O. M. 1868. Bidrag till Sparagmitetagens geognosi och paleontologi. Acta Universitatis Lundensis, Lunds Universitets Årsskrift 4, 1–40.Google Scholar
Vidal, G. & Nystuen, J. P. 1990. Lower Cambrian acritarch and the Proterozoic-Cambrian boundary in southern Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift 70, 191–222.Google Scholar
Vidal, G., Palacios, T., Gámez-Vintaned, J. A., Díez Balda, M. A. & Grant, S. W. F. 1994. Neoproterozoic-early Cambrian geology and palaeontology of Iberia. Geological Magazine 131 (6), 729–65.Google Scholar
Volkova, N.A. 1969. Akritarkhi severo-zapada Russkoj platformy (Acritarchs of the north-western Russian platform.) In Tommotskij Yarus i Problema Nizhnej Granitsy Kembriya (Tommotian Stage and the Cambrian Lower Boundary Problem) (ed. Rozanov, A. Yu.), pp. 224–36. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Yuan, J. -L. & Li, Y. 1999. Lower-Middle Cambrian Boundary and Trilobite Fauna at Laoyingshan, Huainan, Anhui (Chinese and English). Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 38, 407–22.Google Scholar
Zamarreño, I. 1978. Tipos y distribución de facies en el nivel carbonatado del Cámbrico de España. Cuadernos del Seminario de Estudios Cerámicos de Sargadelos 27, 287–311.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1984. The Atdabanian Stage. In Lower Cambrian Stage Subdivision, Stratigraphy (eds Rozanov, A. Yu. & Sokolov, B.), pp. 96–100. Moscow: Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki.Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1995. Preliminary suggestions on the global Early Cambrian zonation. Beringeria 2, 147–60.Google Scholar