Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:53:58.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Fossils from Girvan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

F. R. Cowper Reed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the establishment of the two genera Tentaculites and Cornulites by Schlotheim in 1820 their relations have frequently been discussed, but no general agreement has been reached, and their characters have been differently defined by various authors, so that the generic position even of well-known species is rather an open question. For instance, the proper reference of “Tentaculites” anglicus Salter is still somewhat undecided.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 60 , Issue 6 , June 1923 , pp. 268 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 268 note 1 Vine, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxviii, 1882, pp. 379, 387;Google Scholar Foerste, , Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. xxiv, 1889, p. 276.Google Scholar

page 268 note 2 Vine, , op. cit., pp. 377–92, pl. xv.Google Scholar

page 268 note 3 Nicholson, , Amer. Journ. Sc., ser. III, vol. iii, 1872, p. 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 269 note 1 Barrande, , Syst. Silur. Bohême, vol. iii, pp. 110–34.Google Scholar

page 269 note 2 Hall, , Palœont. New York, iii, 1859, p. 136, pl. vi, figs. 16–21.Google Scholar

page 269 note 3 Schlotheim, , Petrefact., 1820, p. 377, pl. xxix, fig. 8a (non 8b);Google Scholar Moberg, & Grönwall, , Kungl. Fysiogr. Sällsk. Handl., Bd. 20, No. 1, 1909, p. 46, t. ii, fig.Google Scholar

page 269 note 4 Barrande, , op. cit., p. 131, pl. xiv, figs. 20–7.Google Scholar

page 269 note 5 Boll, , Zeitschr. deut. Geol. Gesell., Bd. viii, 1856, p. 321.Google Scholar

page 269 note 6 Swallow, , Second Ann. Rept. Geol. Surv. Missouri, 1855, p. 195, pl. b, fig.Google Scholar

page 269 note 7 Hall, , Palœont. New York, vol. vii, Suppl., 1888, p. 18, pl. cxv, fig.31, pl. cxvi, fig. 31.Google Scholar

page 269 note 8 Savage, , Bull. 23, Geol. Surv. Illinois, 1913, p. 41, pl. ii, fig. 7.Google Scholar

page 269 note 9 Schlotheim, , op. cit., p. 378, pl. xxix, fig. 7.Google Scholar

page 269 note 10 Ludwig, , Palœontographica, xi, 1864, p. 317, t. l, fig. 4.Google Scholar

page 270 note 1 Nicholson, , Trans. Edinburgh Geol. Soc., vol. vi, 1890, pp. 66, 67.Google Scholar

page 270 note 2 Grabau, , Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sc., vol. vi, 1899, p. 282.Google Scholar

page 270 note 3 Ibid., vol. vii, 1901, p. 161.

page 270 note 4 Clarke, & Ruedemann, , Mem. New York State Mus., N.S., 1903, p. 105, pl. iv, figs. 1–5.Google Scholar

page 272 note 1 Vine, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxviii, 1882, p. 379, pl. xv, figs. 1, 9, 10.Google Scholar

page 272 note 2 Swallow, , Second Ann. Rept. Geol. Surv. Missouri, 1855, p. 195, pl. b, figs. 6a–b.Google Scholar

page 272 note 3 Hall, , Palœont. New York, vol. vii, Suppl., 1888, p. 18, pl. cxv, fig. 31; pl. cxvi, fig. 31;Google Scholar Keyes, , Missouri Geol. Surv., vol. v, pt. ii, 1894, p. 217, pl. xxxv, fig. 3;Google Scholar Savage, , Bull. 23, Geol. Surv. Illinois, 1917, p. 97, pl. iv, fig. 7.Google Scholar

page 274 note 1 Hall, , op. cit., p. 18, pl cxv, figs. 28–30, 33–9,Google Scholar and references in Bassler, , Bull. 92, U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. i, 1915, p. 280.Google Scholar

page 274 note 2 Savage, , Bull. 23. Geol. Surv. Illinois, 1917, p. 97, pl. iv, fig. 6.Google Scholar