Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:35:23.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on the Origin of Basic Xenoliths in Plutonic Rocks, with special reference to their Grain-size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Germaine A. Joplin
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Cambridge.

Summary and conclusions

It has been suggested that the grain-size of coarse basic plutonic rocks may be reduced in one or all of three ways:— (1) If the temperature of the invading magma be sufficient, the reduction may be effected by the formation of a granoblastic structure. It is pointed out that recrystallized inclusions are found more often in basic plutonic masses, where the earlier crystalloblastic structures are not obliterated by superimposed hybridization. In 1933 (p. 156) the writer suggested that relict felspars with granular inclusions (or clouding) may be useful criteria of a recrystallization antedating hybridization. (2) The grain-size may be reduced by the development of highly poikilitic crystals of hornblende and/or biotite, and by the final disruption of these. Such crystals may be formed as poikiloblasts in the initial recrystallization; but more often they may be attributed to hybridization, and in this process hornblende plays an important rôle. (3) The grain-size may be reduced by the formation of granular masses of pyroxene or by criss-cross flakes of biotite during hybridization. Thomas and Campbell Smith (1932) and Nockolds (1932) have discussed the development of large felspars within the fine grained xenolith and its final incorporation in the acid magma, but it is not the purpose of the present paper to deal with this stage. It is hoped that this discussion may have indicated a means by which coarse basic plutonic rocks may become fine grained xenoliths, and it is finally urged that it is not always necessary to postulate a fine grained origin for these inclusions.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, E. B., and Thomas, H. H., (1924). “Tertiary and Post-Tertiary Geology of Mull, Loch Aline, and Oban,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scot., pp. 219, 256, 317, 348, 352, 354.Google Scholar
Bowen, N. L., (1922). “The Behaviour of Inclusions in Igneous Magmas,” Journ. Geol., xxx, 177198.Google Scholar
Grantham, D. R., (1928). “The Petrology of the Shap Granite,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxxix, 324.Google Scholar
Harker, A., (1904). “The Tertiary Igneous Rocks of Skye,” Mem. Geol. Surv. United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Joplik, G. A., (1933). “The Petrology of the Hartley District—II. The Metamorphosed Gabbros and Associated Hybrid and Contaminated Rocks,” Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., lviii, 128, 132, 156.Google Scholar
MacGregor, A. G., (1931). (a) “Clouded Felspar and Thermal Metamorphism,” Min. Mag., xxii, 524.Google Scholar
MacGregor, A. G., (1931). (b) “Scottish Pyroxene-Granulite Hornfelses and Odenwald Beer-bachite,” Geol. Mag., LXVIII, 513.Google Scholar
Nockolds, S. R., (1932). “The Contaminated Granite of Bibette Head, Alderney,” Geol. Mag., LXIX, 433451.Google Scholar
Richey, J. E., and Thomas, H. H., (1930). “Geology of Ardnamurchan, N.W. Mull and Coll,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scot., 279.Google Scholar
Sederholm, J. J., (1916). “On Synantetic Minerals and Related Phenomena,” Bull, de la Comm. Géol. de Finlande, No. 48, 5, 59.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. H., and Smith, W. Campbell, (1932). “Xenoliths of Igneous Origin in the Trégastel-Ploumanac’h Granite, Côtes du Nord, France,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxviii, p. 274 et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. E., (1923). “Genesis of Rhombic Pyroxene in Thermal Metamorphism,” Geol. Mag., LX, 417.Google Scholar