It is proposed to offer a few remarks as to the general relations of the rocks described to their associates in the Channel Islands, and in the Armorican Massif generally.
page 241 note 1 Hill, E., Q.J.G.S., vol. xliii, 1887, pp. 322–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bonney, T. G. and Hill, B., Q.J.G.S., vol. lxviii, 1892, pp. 122–44Google Scholar; also Bonney, T. G., Q.J.G.S., vol. lxviii, 1912, pp. 55.Google Scholar
page 244 note 1 Stillwell, , Sci. Reports Inst. Antarctic Exped., 1911–1914, ser. A, vol. iii, pt. i, 1918.Google Scholar
page 247 note 1 “The Geology of Ben Nevis and Glen Coe”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1916, pp. 151, 153Google Scholar
page 247 note 2 Van Hise, , Treatise on Metamorphism, p. 287.Google Scholar
page 249 note 1 Bowen, N. L., “The Behaviour of Inclusions in Igneous Magmas”: Journ. of Geol., vol. xxx, 1922, p. 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 251 note 1 Farquharson, , Q.J.G.S., vol. Ixxx, 1924, p. 375.Google Scholar
page 251 note 2 Q.J.G.S., vol. lxxx, 1924, pp. 384, 385.Google Scholar
page 251 note 3 Carte Géologique de la France, Sheet 42 (Tréguier), with marginal ‘Notice Explicative’ by Ch. Barrois and M. Michel-Lévy.Google Scholar
page 252 note 1 Mem. Geol. Surv., 1912, pp. 18, 19.