Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T19:06:17.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recommendation to discontinue the use of the terms ‘niobiform’ and ‘isoteliform’ in the description of asaphid (trilobita) sutures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. P. Hughes
C. P. Hughes
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , May 1971 , pp. 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

Harrington, H. J. & Leanza, A. F. 1957. Ordovician trilobites of Argentina. Univ. Kansas, Dept. Geol. Lawrence, Spec. Publ. 1, 276 pp., 140 fig.Google Scholar
Lake, P. 1906–1946. The British Cambrian trilobites. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), Lond. 850 pp., 47 pls.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1959. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part 0. Arthropoda 1. xix + 560 pp., 415 figs. Lawrence & Meriden.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1910. Notes on Ordovician trilobites. 11 Asaphidae from the Beekmantown. Ann. Carneg. Mus. 7(1), 35–45, pl. 14.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1955–1967. The Ordovician trilobites of the shelve inlier, West Shropshire. Palaeontogr. Soc.(Monogr.), Lond. 352 pp., 50 pls.Google Scholar