Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:21:30.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Significance of AMS analysis in evaluating superposed folds in quartzites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2010

MANISH A. MAMTANI  and
POULOMI SENGUPTA
MANISH A. MAMTANI*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-721302, India
POULOMI SENGUPTA
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-721302, India
*
*Author for correspondence: mamtani@gg.iitkgp.ernet.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quartzites tend to be compositionally homogeneous, and because of this, deformation related fabric elements (foliations and lineations) are poorly developed in them. This makes structural analysis of deformed quartzites challenging. The measurement of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) is useful for recognizing structural imprints in rocks that lack mesoscopic fabrics and the present study is carried out with an aim to demonstrate the robustness of AMS in analysing such deformation imprints in quartzites. AMS data of samples from folded quartzites located in an approximately 10 km2 area around Galudih (eastern India) are presented. Although on a regional scale, superposed deformation and ductile shearing are known from the area, the investigated quartzites do not preserve mesoscopic evidence of these large-scale features and have developed folds that plunge gently towards the SE with a vertical NW–SE-striking axial plane. The magnetic foliation recorded from AMS analysis is parallel to the axial plane, while the orientation of the magnetic lineation varies from SE through vertical to NW. This is similar to the large-scale fold axis variations recorded in various regional domains mapped over an area of about 200 km2. It is concluded that although the imprint of regional superposed deformation is not obvious on the mesoscopic scale in the quartzites around Galudih, this imprint can be detected from the magnetic fabric. The present study thus highlights the usefulness of AMS in analysing superposed folds in quartzites.

Keywords

anisotropy of magnetic susceptibilityfoldsdeformationquartzites
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 147 , Issue 6 , November 2010 , pp. 910 - 918
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borradaile, G. J. & Jackson, M. 2004. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS): magnetic petrofabrics of deformed rocks. In Magnetic Fabric: Methods and Applications (eds Martín-Hernández, F., Lüneburg, C. M., Aubourg, C. & Jackson, M.), pp. 299–360. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 238.Google Scholar
Bouchez, J. L. 1997. Granite is never isotropic: an introduction to AMS studies of granitic rocks. In Granite: From Segregation of Melt to Emplacement Fabrics (eds Bouchez, J. L., Hutton, D. W. H. & Stephens, W. E.), pp. 95–112. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wall, H., Greiling, R. O. & Sadek, M. F. 2001. Post-collisional shortening in the late Pan-African Hamisana high strain zone, SE Egypt: field and magnetic fabric evidence. Precambrian Research 107, 79–194.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. A. & Dey, A. K. 1942. The geology and petrology of eastern Singhbhum and surrounding areas. Geological Survey of India Memoir 69, 281–450.Google Scholar
Ghosh, M., Mukhopadhyay, D. & Sengupta, P. 2006. Pressure–temperature-deformation history for a part of the Mesoproterozoic fold belt in North Singhbhum, Eastern India. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 26, 555–74.Google Scholar
Hrouda, F. 1982. Magnetic anisotropy of rocks and its application in geology and geophysics. Geophysical Survey 5, 37–82.Google Scholar
Hrouda, F. 1986. The effect of quartz on the magnetic anisotropy of quartzite. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 30, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayangondaperumal, R. & Dubey, A. K. 2001. Superposed folding of a blind thrust and formation of klippen: Results of anisotropic magnetic susceptibility studies from the Lesser Himalaya. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 19, 713–25.Google Scholar
Jelinek, V. 1981. Characterization of the magnetic fabric of rocks. Tectonophysics 79, T63–7.Google Scholar
Kratinová, Z., Schulmann, K., Edel, J.-B., Ježek, J. & Schaltegger, U. 2007. Model of successive granite sheet emplacement in transtensional setting: Integrated microstructural and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility study. Tectonics 26, TC6003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majumder, S. & Mamtani, M. A. 2009. Magnetic fabric in the Malanjkhand Granite (central India) – implications for regional tectonics and Proterozoic suturing of the Indian shield. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 172, 310–23.Google Scholar
Mamtani, M. A. & Arora, B. R. 2005. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility – a useful tool for analyses of naturally deformed rocks. Himalayan Geology 26, 175–86.Google Scholar
Mamtani, M. A. & Greiling, R. O. 2005. Granite emplacement and its relation with regional deformation in the Aravalli Mountain Belt (India) – inferences from magnetic fabric. Journal of Structural Geology 27, 2008–29.Google Scholar
Mamtani, M. A. & Sengupta, A. 2009. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility analysis of deformed kaolinite: implications for evaluating landslides. International Journal of Earth Sciences 98, 1721–5.Google Scholar
Mamtani, M. A., Greiling, R. O., Karanth, R. V. & Merh, S. S. 1999. Orogenic deformation and its relation with AMS fabric – an example from the southern Aravalli mountain belt, India. In The Indian subcontinent and Gondwana: a palaeomagnetic and rock magnetic perspective (eds Radhakrishna, T. & Piper, J. D. A.), pp. 9–24. Geological Society of India, Memoir no. 44.Google Scholar
Mamtani, M. A., Ghosh, A., Chaudhuri, A. K. & Sengupta, D. 2004. Joint Pattern in Precambrian rocks around Galudih (India): implications for fold mechanism. Gondwana Research 7, 579–83.Google Scholar
Mukherji, A., Chaudhuri, A. K. & Mamtani, M. A. 2004. Regional scale strain variations in the Banded Iron Formations of eastern India: results from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility studies. Journal of Structural Geology 26, 2175–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, D. & Sengupta, S. 1971. Structural geometry and time relation of metamorphic recrystallisation to deformation in the Precambrian rocks near Simulpal, Eastern India. Geological Society of America Bulletin 82, 2251–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, D., Ghosh, M. & Chattopadhyay, A. K. 2004. Structural pattern in the Dhalbhumgarh–Kokpara region and its bearing on the tectonics of the Proterozoic fold belt of North Singhbhum, Eastern India. Geological Survey of India, Special Publication 84, 43–60.Google Scholar
Naha, K. 1959. Steeply plunging recumbent folds. Geological Magazine 96, 137–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naha, K. 1965. Metamorphism in relation to stratigraphy, structure and movements in parts of east Singhbhum, eastern India. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Mining & Metallurgical Society of India 37, 41–95.Google Scholar
Saha, A. K. 1994. Crustal Evolution of Singhbhum–North Orissa, Eastern India. Geological Society of India Memoir 27, 341 pp.Google Scholar
Stacey, F. D., Joplin, G. & Lindsay, J. 1960. Magnetic anisotropy and fabric of some foliated rocks from S. E. Australia. Pure and Applied Geophysics 47, 30–40.Google Scholar
Tarling, D. H. & Hrouda, F. 1993. The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rocks. London: Chapman and Hall, 217 pp.Google Scholar
Žák, J., Schulmann, K. & Hrouda, F. 2005. Multiple magmatic fabrics in the Sazava pluton (Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic): a result of superposition of wrench-dominated regional transpression on final emplacement. Journal of Structural Geology 27, 805–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žák, J., Verner, K. & Týcová, P. 2008. Multiple magmatic fabrics in plutons: an overlooked tool for exploring interactions between magmatic processes and regional deformation? Geological Magazine 145, 537–51.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Piper, J. D. A. 1994. Magnetic fabric and post-orogenic uplift and cooling magnetizations in a Precambrian granulite terrain: The Datong-Huai'an region of the North China Shield. Tectonophysics 243, 227–46.Google Scholar