Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:12:16.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Significance of Septa and Sutures in Jurassic Ammonite Systematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

G. E. G. Westermann
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada.

Abstract

A study of Stephanocerataceae and Perisphinctaceae of the Middle Jurassic demonstrates that the structure of the septa comprises a complex vault and pillar system which is functionally adapted to the dimensions of the tube so as to give maximal stability to the shell. Only through a study of the septum can we interpret the different forms of the suture and discriminate between important and unimportant features. Different septa may have analogous sutures, especially in the external parts. These septal patterns are strikingly consistent within subfamilies or families even where other features suggest overlap between the groups. Some parts of the septum are not adapted, but either retained from earlier ontogeny or inherited, and constitute vestigial (genotypic) characters distributed through taxons.

These empirical results have been applied to the taxonomy of some groups of hitherto doubtful systematic position (Cadomitinae, Normannitinae, Sphaeroceratinae, Parkinsoniidae, Spiroceratidae).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arkell, W. J., 1950. A Classification of the Jurassic Ammonites. Journ. Pal., xxiv, 353364.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J., 19511957. Monograph of the English Bathonian Ammonites. Palaeont. Soc.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1954. The Bajocian Ammonites of Western Australia. Palaeont. Soc. (B), ccxxxvii, 547.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1957 a. Introduction to: Mesozoic Ammonoidea; and systematic descriptions (Jurassic part). In: Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, Part L.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1947 b. Sutures and Septa in Jurassic Ammonite systematics. Geol. Mag, xciv, 235248.Google Scholar
Pfaff, E., 1911. Über Form und Bau der Ammonitensepten und ihre Beziehungen zur Suturlinie. 4. Jahresber. Niedersächs. Geol. Ver. Hannover, 207223.Google Scholar
Pompeckj, J. F., 1894. Über Ammonoideen mit anormaler Wohnkammer. Jahresh. Ver. vaterl. Naturk. Württemberg, xlix, 220.Google Scholar
Ruzhencev, V. E., 1946. Evolution and Functional Significance of the Septa in Ammonites. Bull. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S., Cl. Sci. biol., 675706 (Russ. with Engl. abstr.).Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H., 1951. Zur Morphologie und Terminologie der Ammoneen-Lobenlinie. Paläont. Zeitschr., xxv, 1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H., 1953. Über Strenoceras und andere Dogger-Ammoniten. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläont., Monatsh., 119130.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H., 1957. Die Lobenlinie im System der Ammonoidea. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläont., Monatsh., 433443.Google Scholar
Shrock, P., and Twenhofel, H., 1953. Principles of Invertebrate Paleontology. New York.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F., 1944. Problems of Ammonites Nomenclature. IX. The Genus Stephanoceras Waagen, and some allied Genera. Geol. Mag., lxxxi, 230–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, d'Arcy W., 1942. On Growth and Form (2nd ed.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Westermann, G., 1954. Monographic der Otoitidae (Ammonoidea). Beihefte zum Geol. Jahrb., Heft 15.Google Scholar
Westermann, G., 1956 a. Phylogenie der Stephanocerataceae und Perisphinctaceae des Dogger. Neue Jahrb. Geol. Paläont., Abh. 103, 233279.Google Scholar
Westermann, G., 1956 b. Monographic der Bajocien-Gattungen Sphaeroceras und Chondroceras (Ammonoidea). Beihefte zum Geol. Jahrb., Heft 24.Google Scholar
Westermann, G., 1958. Ammoniten-Fauna und Stratigraphie des Bathonien NW-Deutschlands. Beihefte zum Geol. Jahrb., Heft 32.Google Scholar