No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
page 275 note * Journ. Geol. Soc., vol.xx. p. 198.Google Scholar
page 276 note * A marked case of the result of trying to classify a set of beds by fossils alone occurs in a late number of the Journ. Geol. Soc. (vol. xx. p. 99), where, in a classification of the English Tertiaries, the Upper and the Lower Bagshot Beds are missed outj we suppose because they do not yield fossils, and therefore, though sometimes 200 and 600 feet thick respectively, are not worth taking into account!Google Scholar
page 276 note † Prepared by Mr. S. P. Woodward.