Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:54:16.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Nomenclatural Problems in the Inarticulate Brachiopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. J. Rowell
A. J. Rowell
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five nomenclatural problems in the inarticulate brachiopods are discussed and solutions suggested for them. Two new genera, Eodinobolus, type species Obolellina magnifica Billings, 1872 and Orthisocrania, type species Pseudocrania divaricata M'Coy, 1851 are erected. Clistotrema nom. nov. for Orbicella d'Orbigny, 1847 non Orbicella Dana, 1846 is proposed.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 100 , Issue 1 , February 1963 , pp. 33 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, W. C., 1941. Cambrian Brachiopoda from Montana. J. Paleont., 15, 193–255.Google Scholar
Bell, W. C., 1944. Early Upper Cambrian Brachiopods. In Lochman, C. and Duncan, D. Early Upper Cambrian Faunas of Central Montana. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Amer., 54, 144–171.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1871. On some new species of Palaeozoic Fossils. Canadian Nat. and Quart. Journ. Sci., New Ser., 6, 213–222.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1872. On the genus Obolellina. Canadian Nat. and Quart. Journ. Sci., New Ser., 6, 326–333.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A., 1944. Phylum Brachiopoda. In Shimer, H. W. and Schrock, R. R. Index Fossils of North America, pp. 277–365, New York.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A., 1956. Chazyan and Related Brachiopods. Smithsonian misc. Coll. 127.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H., 1871. Supplement to the “Revision of the Terebratulidae” with additions, corrections and a revision of the Craniidae and Discinidae. Amer. J. Conch., 7, 39–84.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H., 1877. “Index to the Names which have been applied to the subdivisions of the Class Brachiopoda.” Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 8, 7–88.Google Scholar
Dana, J., 1846. Zoophytes U.S. Explor. Exped. 7, 7–740, Washington.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., 1848. Memoire sur les Brachiopodes du systeme silurien superieur d'Angleterre. Bull. Soc. géol. France. 2nd Ser. 8, 309–338.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., 1853. British Fossil Brachiopoda. 1. Introduction: Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, T., King, W., 1874. On the Trimerellidae, a Palaeozoic Family of the Palliobranchs or Brachiopoda. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 30, 124–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. and Condra, G. E., 1932. Brachiopods of the Pennsylvanian System in Nebraska. Bull. Nebraska Geol. Surv. 5, (2nd Ser.).Google Scholar
Emmons, E., 1842. Geology of New York. Part II, Survey of the Second Geological District. Albany.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E., 1840. Ueber das silurische Schichtensystem in Esthland St. Petersburgh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichwald, E., 1854(a). Die Grauwackenschichten von Liev—und Esthland Bull. Soc. Imp. des Naturalistes de Moscou. 27, 3–111.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E., 1854 (b). Ein Beitrag zur Geologie und Paläontologie von Russland. Moskau. (Reference according to v. Huene, 1899, p. 188, work not seen, pagination unknown).Google Scholar
Eichwald, E., 1860, Lethaea Rossica ou Paléontologie de la Russie Vol. 1, Second section, 681–1657.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H., 1909. The fauna of the Caney Shale of Oklahoma. Bull. U.S. geol. Surv., 377, 5–106.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H., 1928. The generic name Orbiculoidea d'Orbigny and its application. J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 18, 128–142.Google Scholar
Goryansky, V., 1960. Class Inarticulata in Sarycheva, T. G., (ed.), Osnovy Paleontologii, Mshanki, brakhiopody. 172–182, Moscow.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1861. Descriptions of new species of fossils. Rept. of the superintendent of the Geol. Survey of Wisconsin, 11–52.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1871. Notes on some new or imperfectly known forms among the Brachiopoda. Preliminary Notice: Twenty-third Ann. Report on the State Cabinet of Natural History (Abstract), 1–5.Google Scholar
Hall, J., Clarke, J. M., 1892. An introduction to the study of the Genera of Palaeozoic Brachiopoda. Palaeontology of New York, vol. 8, pt. 1.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1894. Introduction to the Study of the Brachiopoda intended as a Handbook for the use of Students. Part 1, Ann. Rep. N.Y. St. Geol. II (1891), 128–300.Google Scholar
Haskell, D. C., 1942. The United States Exploring Expedition, 1838–1842 and its Publications 1844–1874. A. Bibliography. New York.Google Scholar
Huene, F. von, 1899. Die Silurischen Craniaden der Ostseeländer mit ausschluss Gotlands. Verh. Kaiserlichen Russischen Min. Gesell. St. Petersburg, 2nd Ser., 36, 181–359.Google Scholar
Lindemann, E., 1870. Das fünfzïgjährige Doktorjubiläum Eduard von Eichwald's, Dr. der Philosophie, Medezin und Chirurgie. Verh. Russ. Kais. Min. Gesell. St. Petersburg. 2nd Ser., 15, 278–358.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F., 1851. On some new Cambo-Silurian Fossils. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., 2nd Ser., 8, 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. A., 1889. North American Geology and Palaeontology. Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
Neave, S. A., 1940. Nomenclator Zoologicus, III, London.Google Scholar
Oehlert, D., 1887. Appendice Brachiopodes. In Fischer, P., Manuel de Conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique. Fasc. II: Paris.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d', 1847. Sur les Brachiopodes ou Palliobranchs. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., 25, 266–269.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d', 1850. Prodrome de paleontologie stratigraphique universelle, 1, Paris.Google Scholar
Pander, C. H., 1830. Beitrage zur Geognosie des Russischen Reiches. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Pander, C. H., 1861. In Helmersen, G., Die geologische Beschaffenheit des untern Narovathals und die Versandung der Narovamiindung. Bull. Acad. imp. sci. St. Petersbourg, 3, columns 46–49.Google Scholar
Rõõmusoks, A., 1960. Stratigrafiya i Korrelyatsiya Ordovika i Silura. Mezhkunarodnyy Geologicheskiy Kongress XXI Sessiya Doklady Sovetskikh Geology Problema, 7. Leningrad. 53–70. (In Russian with English summary).Google Scholar
Rowell, A. J., 1962 (a). The genera of the Brachiopod superfamilies Obolellacea and Siphonotretacea. J. Paleont., 36, 136–152.Google Scholar
Rowell, A. J., 1962 (b). Proposed use of the plenary powers to designate for the genus Dicellomus Hall, 1871, (Phylum Brachiopoda, Class Inarticulata) a type species in harmony with present usage. Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 19, 308–309.Google Scholar
Rowell, A. J., 1962 (c). Proposed use of the plenary powers to designate for the genus Orbiculoidea d'Orbigny, 1847, (Phylum Brachiopoda, Class Inarticulata) a type species in harmony with present usage. Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 19, 311–314.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. and LeVene, C. M., 1929. Brachiopoda (Generum et Genotyporum Index et Bibliographia) Fossilium Catalogus, I, Animalia 42, Berlin.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H., 1882. Nomenclator Zoologicus, Part I, Supplemental List of Genera in Zoology. Bull. 19, U.S. Nat. Mus.Google Scholar
Sharpe, D., 1848. On Trematis, a new genus belonging to the family of Brachiopodous Mollusca. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 4, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherborn, C. D., 1929. Index Animalium, part xviii.Google Scholar
Verneuil, E. de, 1845. In Murchison, R. I., Verneuil, E. de and Keyserling, A. de, Geologie de la Russie d'Europe et des Montagnes de l'Oural. 2 (3) Paleontologie: London and Paris.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D., 1912. “Cambrian Brachiopoda”. U.S. Geol. Survey, Monograph 51.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W., 1956. In Moore, R. C. (Ed.) “Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part F, Coelenterata”.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. E., 1946. Brachiopods of the Ottawa Formation of the Ottawa— St. Lawrence Lowland. Bull. Geol. Surv. Canada, 8.Google Scholar