Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:27:37.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stratigraphic distribution and classification of Foraminifera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

M. D. Brasier
M. D. Brasier
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University, Hull
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 120 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 85 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnard, T. 1960. Some species of Lenticulina and associated genera from the Lias of England. Micropaleontology 6, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1980. Microfossils. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1982. Architecture and evolution of the foraminiferid test: a theoretical approach. In Aspects of Micropalaeontology (ed. Banner, F. T. and Lord, A. R.). London: George Allen & Unwin. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Brotzen, F. 1963. Evolutionary trends in certain calcareous foraminifera on the Palaeozoic-Mesozoic boundary. In Evolutionary Trends in Foraminifera (ed. von Koenigswald, G. H. R. et al.), pp. 66–78. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Brouwer, J. 1969. Foraminiferal assemblages from the Lias of N. W. Europe. Verh. K. ned. Akad. Wet. 25, 1–64.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A. 1948. Foraminifera, their Classification and Economic Use, 4th ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føyn, S. & Glaessner, M. F. 1979. Platysolenites, other animal fossils, and the Precambrian-Cambrian transition in Norway. Norsk geol. Tidsskr. 59, 25–46.Google Scholar
Galloway, J. J. 1933. A Manual of Foraminifera. Bloomington, Indiana: Principia Press.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1945. Principles of Micropalaeontology. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Hohenegger, J. & Piller, W. 1975. Wandstrukturen und Grossgleiderung der Foraminiferen. Sber. öst. Akad. Wiss. Abt. 1, 184, 67–96.Google Scholar
Hohenegger, J. & Piller, W. 1977. Die stellung der Involutinidae Butschli und Spirillinidae Reuss im System der Foraminiferen. Neues Jb. Geöl. Palaont. Mh. 7, 407–18.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. & Tappan, H. 1964. Protista 2. Sarcodina, chiefly ‘Thecamoebians’ and Foraminiferida. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology part C, 2 vols (ed. Moore, R. C.). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. & Tappan, H. 1974. Recent advances in the classification of the Foraminiferida. In Foraminfera, vol. 1. (ed. Hedley, R. H. and Adams, C. G.), pp. 1–53. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pokorny, V. 1965. Principles of Zoological Micropalaeontology, vols 1 and 2 (ed. Neale, J. W.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 1978. Description of the macrofossils from the Dolwen Formation. Bull. geol. Surv. G.B. 61, 46–8.Google Scholar
Tappan, H. 1976. Systematics and the species concept in benthonic foraminiferal taxonomy. Spec. Publ. Marit. Sediments 1 A, 301–13.Google Scholar
Wood, A. 1949. The structure of the wall of the test in the Foraminifera; its value in classification. Q. Jl. geol. Soc., Lond. 104, 229–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar