Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:38:13.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The structure and shape of the Jimberlana Intrusion, Western Australia, as indicated by an investigation of the Bronzite Complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

K. R. McClay  and
I. H. Campbell
K. R. McClay
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Royal School of Mines, Imperial College of Science, London S.W.7, England
I. H. Campbell
Affiliation:
School of Geology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The structure of the partly exposed lower section of the Jimberlana Intrusion has been determined by combining the geophysical evidence with the available geological and diamond drill hole data. The results have been added to the wellknown upper section to show that Jimberlana is not a dyke-like body as had previously been thought, but is a horizontal pipe-like intrusion 180 km long, 2.5km wide and 5.5 km deep, with a V-shaped cross-section. A marginal series with ‘reversed’ fractionation and high primary dips, similar to the marginal series of the Muskox Intrusion, occupies the lower part of the intrusion. The rocks of this series display rhythmic layering and a variety of cumulate textural types indicating that cumulate processes can take place during deposition on near-vertical dipping surfaces.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 113 , Issue 2 , March 1976 , pp. 129 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhattacharji, S. & Smith, C. H. 1964. Flowage differentiation. Sci. 145, 150–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bott, M. H. P. 1960. The use of rapid digital computing methods for direct gravity interpretation of sedimentary basins. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 3, 63–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, I. H., McCall, G. J. H. & Tyrwhitt, D. S. 1970. The Jimberlana Norite, Western Australia — a smaller analogue of the Great Dyke of Rhodesia. Geol. Mag. 107, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. E. 1968. Magnetization of dikes: a study of the paleomagnetism of the Widgiemooltha Dike suite, Western Australia. J. geophys. Res. 73, 3261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, W. R. 1970. Gravity diagrams for thickness determination of exposed rock bodies. Geophysics 35, 471–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komar, P. D. 1972. Flow differentiation in igneous dikes and sills: profiles of velocity and phenocryst concentration. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 83, 3443–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClay, K. R. 1974. Single-domain magnetite in the Jimberlana Norite, Western Australia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 21, 367–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podmore, F. 1970. The shape of the Great Dyke of Rhodesia as revealed by gravity surveying. Geol. Soc. South Africa, Spec. Publ. 1, 610–20.Google Scholar
Skeels, D. C. 1963. An approximate solution of the problem of maximum depth in gravity interpretation. Geophysics 28, 724–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talwani, M., Worzel, J. L. & Landisman, M. 1959. Rapid gravity computations for two-dimensional bodies with application to the Mendocino submarine fracture zone. J. geophys. Res. 64, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, G. A. (in the press). Nickel-copper sulphide mineralization in the Jimberlana Intrusion, Western Australia. In: Knight, C. L. (Ed.); Economic Geology of Australia and Papua-New Guinea. Aust. Inst. Min Metall.Google Scholar
Wager, L. R. & Brown, G. M. 1968. Layered igneous rocks. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Zurflueh, E. G. 1967. Applications of two-dimensional linear wavelength filtering. Geophysics 32, 1015–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar