No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
1 See further the recent attempt to base copyright on a synthesis of individual and utilitarian justifications by Matthias Leistner & Hansen, Die Begründung des Urheberrechts im digitalen Zeitalter – Grundlagen, Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten und Grenzen, 62 Juristenzeitung (JZ) (2007) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
2 Remarkably, Locke himself never intended to apply his approach to non-physical property, as Pascal Oberndörfer, Die philosophische Grundlage des Urheberrechts (2005), has pointed out recently in his study on philosophical foundations of copyright which is essentially limited to an analysis of Locke's labour theory.Google Scholar
3 See Matthew H. Kramer, John Locke and the Origins of Private Property: Philosophical Explorations of Individualism, Community, and Equality (1997).Google Scholar
4 See Dreier, Thomas, Book Review: Christian G. Stallberg, Urheberrecht und Moralische Rechtfertigung, 109 Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 128, at 129 (2007); however, with a more favorable assessment Hannes Rösler, Book Review: Christian G. Stallberg, Urheberrecht und Moralische Rechtfertigung, 62 JZ 185, at 186 (2007).Google Scholar
5 See further Leistner, & Hansen, , supra note 1.Google Scholar
You have
Access