Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:18:54.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embeddedness through Networks: A Critical Appraisal of the Network Concept in the Oeuvre of Karl-Heinz Ladeur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Poul F. Kjaer

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The concept of “network” has become the most central concept within the work of Karl-Heinz Ladeur (KHL). It is an omnibus concept which he uses to extrapolate insights at all levels: It is used to provide a general framework at the level of Gesellschaftstheorie (social theory) in the sense that it provides insights into the general structure of society and thereby into the context within which legal processes unfold. At the level of organizational theory it provides a basis for understanding the transformation of organizational structures as it unfolds through the breakdown of hierarchy and the boundaries between the private and the public, just as the network concept plays an important role in its attempt to formulate a legal theory which is adequate for a society which, according to KHL, has become postmodern.

Type
Globalization
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 4: The Law of the Network Society. A Tribute to Karl-Heinz Ladeur , 01 April 2009 , pp. 483 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Habermas is described as the “Theorist of Double Standards” (my translation). See Karl-Heinz Ladeur, Der Staat gegen die Gesellschaft. Zur Verteidigung der Rationalität der Privatsrechtsgesellschaft 311 (2006); see also Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, Discursive Ethics as Constitutional Theory. Neglecting the Creative Role of Economic Liberties?, 13 Ratio Juris, 95 (2000); for a critique of Habermas on the basis of the example of environmental law see Karl-Heinz Ladeur, Das Umwelt der Wissensgesellschaft: Von der Gefahrenabwehr zum Risikomanagement 37 (1995).Google Scholar

2 Habermas, Jürgen, Die Moderne, ein unvollendetes Projekt. Philosophisch-politische Aufsätze 1977–1990 (1990).Google Scholar

3 Habermas, Jürgen, Why Europe Needs A Constitution, 11 New Left-Review 17 (2001).Google Scholar

4 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, Towards a Legal Theory of Supranationality – The Viability of the Network Concept, 3 European Law Journal 35 (1997).Google Scholar

5 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, “Deliberative Demokratie” und “Dritter Weg” – eine neue Sackgasse? Transformation des “alten “ Sozialstaats in den “aktivierende” Staat?, 41 Der Staat 3 (2002). More generally see also Karl-Heinz Ladeur, Postmoderne Rechtstheorie – Selbstreferenz – Selbstorganisation – Prozeduralisierung (1995); and Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, Negative Freiheitsrechte und gesellschaftliche Selbstorganisation. Zur Erzeugung von Sozialkapital durch gesellschaftliche Institutionen (2000).Google Scholar

6 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, Der Staat gegen die Gesellschaft. Zur Verteidigung der Rationalität der Privatsrechtsgesellschaft 296 (2006).Google Scholar

7 Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Reuschemeyer, Theda Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the State Back In (1985).Google Scholar

8 Hegel, Georg W. F., Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse ([1821] 1976).Google Scholar

9 Weber, Eugen, Peasants Into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1880–1914 (1976).Google Scholar

10 For the Italian “Mezzogiorno” see Niklas Luhmann, Kausalität im Süden, Soziale Systeme, 1 Zeitschrift für Soziologische Theorie 7 (1995).Google Scholar

11 Stichweh, Rudolf, Die Weltgesellschaft: Soziologische Analysen (2000).Google Scholar

12 Chile might be the only exception to the persistent tendency of weak states in Latin America. See also Maximiliano Figuroa/Manuel Vicuña (Cor.), El Chile del Bicentenario (2008).Google Scholar

13 Joerges, Christian, Introduction to the Special Issue: Confronting Memories: European “Bitter Experiences” and the Constitutionalization Process, 6, 2 German Law Journal (2005).Google Scholar

14 Charles Tilly, War Making and State Making as Organized Crime, in Bringing the State Back In, 169 – 191 (Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Reuschemeyer & Theda Skocpol eds., 1985).Google Scholar

15 Norbert Elias, Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation, Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen, Band 2; Wandlungen der Gesellschaft. Entwurf zu einer Theorie der Zivilisation (1976)Google Scholar

16 Foucault, Michel, Il faut défendre la société. Cours au Collège de France 1975–1976 (1994).Google Scholar

17 Beck, Ulrich, Die Feindlose Demokratie (1995).Google Scholar

18 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, Der Staat gegen die Gesellschaft. Zur Verteidigung der Rationalität der Privatsrechtsgesellschaft (2006).Google Scholar

19 For example, see Fischer-Lescano, Andreas & Teubner, Gunther, Regime-Kollisionen. Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (2006).Google Scholar

20 For example, see Callies, Gralf-Peter, Transnationales Handelsvertragsrecht: Private Ordnung und staatlicher Rahmen, in Verrechtlichgung – Baustein für Global Governance?, 160 (Michael Zürn & Bernhard Zangl eds., 2004).Google Scholar

21 See Claire Methven O'Brien, Reframing RECON: Perspectives on Transnationalisation and Post-national Democracy from Labor Law, in Transnational Standards of Social Protection. Contrasting European and International Governance, ARENA Report, No. 5, 97 (Christian Joerges & Poul F. Kjaer eds., 2008).Google Scholar

22 See Rödel, Florian, Constitutional integration of Labour Constitutions, in Law, Democracy and Solidarity in a Post-national Union. The Unsettled political order of Europe, 152 (Erik Oddvar Eriksen, Christian Joerges & Florian Rödl eds., 2008).Google Scholar

23 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, Towards a Legal Theory of Supranationality – the Viability of the Network Concept, 3 European Law Journal, 33, 47 (1997).Google Scholar

24 Id., 46.Google Scholar

25 For an overview of the evolution of networks and their Funktionswandel see; Kjaer, Poul F., Post-Hegelian Networks in Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation (Marc Amstutz & Gunther Teubner eds., 2008).Google Scholar

26 Infra, note 23 at 35.Google Scholar

27 For a number of instructive examples of network regulation within the areas of information technology law and environmental law see Karl-Heinz Ladeur, Regulierte Selbstregulierung als Steuerungskonzept des Gewährleistungsstaates, 4 Die Verwaltung, Beiheft 59 (2001).Google Scholar

28 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, The Changing Role of the Private in Public Governance – The Erosion of Hierarchy and the Rise of a New Administrative Law of Cooperation. A Comparative Approach, 9 EUI Working Papers Law, 1–36 (2002).Google Scholar

29 Id., 32.Google Scholar

30 E.g. Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, Der Staat gegen die Gesellschaft. Zur Verteidigung der Rationalität der Privatsrechtsgesellschaft 296 (2006).Google Scholar

31 For example see Id., 5.Google Scholar

32 See especially Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, Der Staat gegen die Gesellschaft. Zur Verteidigung der Rationalität der Privatsrechtsgesellschaft 296 (2006).Google Scholar

33 Bücker, Andreas & Schlacke, Sabine, Die Entstehung einer politischen Verwaltung durch EG-Ausschüsse – Rechtstatsachen und Rechtsentwicklungen in Das Ausschußwesen der Europäischen Union. Die Praxis der Risikoregulierung im Binnenmarkt und ihre rechtliche Verfassung, 161 (Josef Falke & Christian Joerges eds., 2000).Google Scholar

34 Stichweh, Rudolf, Transfer in Sozialsystemen: Theoretische Überlegungen, available at http://www.unilu.ch/files/6stwtransfer.pdf, last accessed 14 February 2009.Google Scholar

35 Kjaer, Poul F., De-Formalization or Formalization through Governance? in Conflict of Laws and Laws of Conflict in Europe and Beyond – Patterns of Supranational and Transnational Juridification, ARENA Report Series (Rainer Nickel ed., 2009, forthcoming).Google Scholar

36 Kjaer, Poul F., Rationality within Reach? On Functional Differentiation as the Structural Condition of Legitimacy in European Chemicals Regulation, 18 European University Institute Working Paper, 1–26(2007).Google Scholar

37 Borch, Christian, Systemic Power. Luhmann, Foucault and Analytics of Power, 48 Acta Sociologica 155 (2005).Google Scholar

38 Luhmann, Niklas, Politik der Gesellschaft 88, 97 (2000).Google Scholar

39 Eckard Kämper & Johannes F. K. Schmidt, Netzwerke als strukturelle Kopplung. Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zum Netzwerkbegriff in Soziale Netzwerke – Konzepte und Methoden der. sozialwissenschaftlichen Nertzwerkforschung, 211 (Weyer, J. Hrsg., 2000).Google Scholar

40 Weiler, Joseph H. H., Epilogue: “Comitology” as Revolution – Infranationalism, Constitutionalism and Democracy, in EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, 339, 342 (Christian Joerges & Ellen Vos eds., 1999).Google Scholar

41 Brodocz, André, Strukturelle Kopplung durch Verbände, 2 Soziale Systeme. Zeitschrift für Systemtheorie 361 (1996).Google Scholar

42 Kjaer, Poul F., The Societal Function of European Integration in the Context of World Society, 13 Soziale Systeme. Zeitschrift für Soziologische Theorie 367 (2007).Google Scholar

43 Haltern, Ulrich, Internationales Verfassungsrecht? Anmerkungen zu einer Kopernikanischen Wende, 128 Archiv des Öffentlichen Rechts 511, 512 (2003) (my translation).Google Scholar

44 For the problematic use of the concept of learning in relation to the OMC see Kröger, Sandra, When learning hits politics or: Social policy coordination left to the administrations and the NGOs? 3 European Integration Online Papers (EioP) (2006).Google Scholar

45 See also Kjaer, Poul F., Three Forms of governance and three forms of power, pp. 23 – 43 in Law, Democracy and Solidarity in a Post-national Union. The unsettled political order of Europe, 23, 31 (Erik Oddvar Eriksen, Christian Joerges & Florian Rödel, 2008).Google Scholar

46 Goffman, Erving, Frame Analysis: Essays on the Organization of Experience (1974).Google Scholar

47 Infra, note 34.Google Scholar

48 Teubner, Gunther, Das Recht hybrider Netzwerke, 165 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht 550 (2001).Google Scholar

49 Kjaer, Poul F., Between Governing and Governance. On the Emergence, Function and Form of Europe's Post-national Constellation, European University Institute 141 (2008), available at http://hdl.handle.net/1814/9067, last accessed 14 February 2009.Google Scholar

50 Fischer-Lescano, Andreas & Teubner, Gunther, Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (2006).Google Scholar

51 Infra, note 48.Google Scholar

52 Luhmann, Niklas, Legitimation durch Verfahren 34 (1969); Würtenberger, Thomas, Legitimität, Legalität, in Geschichtliche Grundbegrieffe, Bd. 3, 677, 737 (O Brunner, W. Conze & R. Koselleck hrsg., 1983).Google Scholar

53 Luhmann, Niklas, Politik der Gesellschaft 124 (2000).Google Scholar

54 Luhmann, Niklas, Rechtssoziologie, Band 2 259 (1972); Luhmann, Niklas, Ausdifferenzierung des Rechts, Beiträge zur Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 132 (1981).Google Scholar

55 Habermas, Jürgen, Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats 135 (1992). For further elaboration see Poul Kjaer, Systems in Context: On the Outcome of the Habermas/Luhmann-debate, Ancilla Iuris 66, 75 (2006).Google Scholar

56 Joerges, Christian & Neyer, Jürgen, From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology, 3 European Law Journal 273 (1997); Joerges, Christian & Neyer, Jürgen, Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comitology in the foodstuffs sector, 4 Journal of European Public Policy 609 (1997).Google Scholar

57 Habermas, Jürgen, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band 1 Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung 386 (1981).Google Scholar

58 Habermas, Jürgen, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft 189 (1981) (my translation, PFK).Google Scholar

59 Luhmann, Niklas, Die Lebenswelt – nach Rücksprache mit Phänomenologen, 72 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 176, 177 (1986); Luhmann, Niklas, Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives, Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, 94 (Diego Gambetta ed., 1988).Google Scholar

60 Luhmann, Niklas, Lob der Routine, 55 Verwaltungsarchiv 1 (1964).Google Scholar

61 For further elaboration see Kjaer, Poul, Systems in Context: On the Outcome of the Habermas/Luhmann-debate, Ancilla Iuris 66 (2006).Google Scholar

62 Infra, note 3.Google Scholar

63 Habermas, Jürgen, Further Reflections on the Public Sphere, in Habermas and the Public Sphere, 452 (Craig Calhoun ed., 1992). Also quoted in Joshua Cohen & Charles Sabel, Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy, 3 European Law Journal 313, 339 (1997).Google Scholar

64 Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer, Grenzerfahrungen und Grenzüberschreitungen: Demokratie in integrierten Europa?, in Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen, 369 (Beate Kohler-Koch eds., 1998); Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer: Deliberativer Supranationalismus, 6, 2 Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen185 (1999).Google Scholar

65 The theory of deliberative supranationalism, however, remains a normative theory and will have to be combined with and underpinned by a genuine descriptive theory capable of explaining how the European postnational constellation emerged in the first place. For preliminary reflections see infra, note 48.Google Scholar