Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:20:56.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global Legal Pluralism and Multipolar Conflicts: A Review of Oren Perez's “Sensitivity and Global Legal Pluralism: Rethinking the Trade and Environment Conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Developments
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Teubner, Gunther, Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society, in Global Law Without a State 3–28 (Gunther Teubner ed., 1997).Google Scholar

2 Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, Finalized by Martti Koskenniemi, General Assembly, International Law Commission, Fifty-eighth session, A/CN.4/L.682 13 April 2006 available at www.un.org Last visited on 01.10.2006; Martti Koskenniemi and Paivi Leino Fragmentation of International Law. Postmodern Anxieties? 15 Leiden Journal of international law 553–579 (2002); Anreas Fischer-Lescano and Gunther Teubner Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law, 25 michigan journal of international law 999–1046(2004).Google Scholar

3 Perez, Oren, ecological sensitivity and global legal pluralism: rethinking the trade and environmental conflict, (2004).Google Scholar

5 Perez, Oren, Normative Creativity and Global Legal Pluralism: Reflections on the Democratic Critique of Transnational Law, 10 Indiana Journal of Global Studies 25–63 (2003).Google Scholar

6 Sarei v Rio Tinto 221 F Supp 2d 116 (US Dist 2002).Google Scholar

7 See supra note 4 at 6.Google Scholar

9 Id. 18.Google Scholar

10 See Teubner, Gunther, Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law, 17 Law & Society Rev. 239 (1983); see the somewhat critical appraisal by Scheuerman, William, Reflexive Law and the Challenges of Globalization, 9 The Journal of Political Philosophy 83 (2001).Google Scholar

11 See supra note 9 at 4.Google Scholar

14 Id. 7.Google Scholar

15 Id. 9.Google Scholar

17 Id. 51.Google Scholar

18 Id. 55.Google Scholar

19 Id. 51–55.Google Scholar

20 Id. 59.Google Scholar

21 Id. 63. GATT, United States-Prohibition of Imports of Tuna and Tuna Products from Canada L/5198, adopted on 22 February 1982, BISD 29S/91; GATT, United States-Restriction of Imports of Tuna DS21/R (unadopted), 3 September 1991, BISD 39S/155.Google Scholar

22 WTO, United States-Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (12 October 1998) WTO Doc. WT/DS58/AB/R (Appellate Body report).Google Scholar

23 Id. 67.Google Scholar

25 Id. 65.Google Scholar

27 Id. 81.Google Scholar

32 Id. 91.Google Scholar

33 Id. 92.Google Scholar

34 See hereto, e.g., Zumbansen, Peer, Beyond Territoriality: The Case of Transnational Human Rights Litigation, ConWEB Paper 4/2005, available at http://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofPoliticsInternationalStudiesand Philosophy/FileStore/ConWEBFiles/Filetoupload,38370,en.pdf (last visited 25 November 2006).Google Scholar

35 Zumbansen, Peer, Review of Niklas Luhmann, Law as a Social System (Law As a social system 466 (Klaus Ziegert trans; Fatima Kastner et. al. eds. 2004), 15 Soc. & Leg. Stud. 453, 456 (2006)Google Scholar

36 Id. 239.Google Scholar

39 Id. 240.Google Scholar

40 Id. 240–241.Google Scholar

41 Luhmann, Niklas, Interaction, Organization and Society in the differentiation of society 79 (Luhmann N. ed, 1982) quoted in Oren Perez, ecological sensitivity and global legal pluralism: rethinking the trade and environmental conflict, (2004).Google Scholar

42 Niklas Luhmann. a sociological theory of law 133 (Elizabeth King and Martin Albrow (trans), 1985).Google Scholar

43 Id. 281.Google Scholar

44 Teubner, Gunther, Global private regimes: Neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution of autonomous sectors in world society?, in Public Governance in the Age of Globalization 71 (Karl-Heinz Ladeur ed., 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 Id. 7.Google Scholar

46 Perez, , see supra note 17 at 19Google Scholar

47 Niklas Luhmann. Law As a social system 466 (Klaus Ziegert trans; Fatima Kastner et al eds. 2004).Google Scholar

48 Id. 469.Google Scholar

49 Id. 467.Google Scholar

50 Perez, , see supra note 43 at 22.Google Scholar

51 Id. 23.Google Scholar