Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:24:14.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Protection of Mothers in British and German Constitutional Law: A Comparative Analysis and a Contribution to the Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights in the Domestic Legal Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Diana Zacharias

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The universal and regional systems of human rights protection recognize that mothers find themselves in situations which require special protection. For instance, Article 10 para. 2 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights stipulates that special protection should be accorded to mothers during a reasonable period before and after childbirth and that during such period working mothers should be accorded paid leave or leave with adequate social security benefits.

Type
Articles
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , 01 January 2008 , pp. 27 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 See Antwi, E. Abena, Women in the World of Work: After Eighty-Six Years, Has the International Labour Organization Done Enough to Promote Equality?, 31 N.C.J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 793, 800-804 (2006); Mlinar, A., Frauenrechte als Menschenrechte 100-102 (1997); Fredman, S., Women and the Law 182 (1997).Google Scholar

2 See also Wiseman, L. J., A Place for “Maternity” in the Global Workplace. International Case Studies and Recommendations for International Labor Policy, 28 Ohio Northern University Law Review 195-229 (2001); Masselot, A., Jurisprudential Developments in Community Pregnancy and Maternity Rights, 9 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 57-66 (2002).Google Scholar

3 For more details about women in refugee law, see Bucherer, J., Frauen und Flüchtlingsrecht, in Frauen und Völkerrecht. Zur Einwirkung von Frauenrechten und Fraueninteressen auf das Völkerrecht 171-187 (B. Rudolf ed., 2006); Roeder, T. S., Frauen als Flüchtlinge: Entwicklungen im Zusammenhang mit der Genfer Flüchtlingskonvention und der Arbeit von UNHCR, in Die Vereinten Nationen und neuere Entwicklungen der Frauenrechte 427-476 (S. von Schorlemer ed., 2007). With regards to recent work on the status of women in international humanitarian law in general, see Schmahl, S., Die Stellung von Frauen im humanitären Völkerrecht, in Gender und Internationales Recht 171-198 (A. Zimmermann & T. Giegerich eds., 2007).Google Scholar

4 See Loughlin, M., Grundlagen und Grundzüge staatlichen Verfassungsrechts: Großbritannien, Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum, Vol. 1, 217, 229-234 (paragraphs 28-40) (A. von Bogdandy, P. Cruz Villalón & P. M. Huber eds., 2007), Grote, R., Die Inkorporierung der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention in das britische Recht durch den Human Rights Act 1998, 58 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV) 309 (1998).Google Scholar

5 EWHC 195 (2002) (paragraphs 60, 62 and 69).Google Scholar

6 See Birkinshaw, P. & Künnecke, M., Offene Staatlichkeit: Großbritannien, in Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum, Vol. 2, 107, 123 (paragraph 38) with references (A. von Bogdandy, P. Cruz Villalón, P. M. Huber eds., 2008); focusing only on the Human Rights Act of 1998: Morris, D., The Human Rights Act 1998: Too Many Loose Ends?, 21 Statute Law Review 104, 117-119 (2000).Google Scholar

7 For example, see “Cameron ‘could scrap’ rights act”, in BBC News of 25 June 2006, available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5114102.stm; Woodward, W., Cameron promises UK bill of rights to replace Human Rights Act, Guardian Unlimited of 26 June 2006, available at http://politics.guardian.co.uk/conservatives/story/0,,1805902,00.html (both articles last visited 12 September 2007).Google Scholar

8 Kleve, G. & Schirmer, B., England und Wales, in Verwaltungsrecht in Europa, Vol. 1, 35, 70 (J.P. Schneider ed., 2007).Google Scholar

9 Morris, supra note 6, 104, 114–116.Google Scholar

10 Chandran, P., A Guide to the Human Rights Act 1998 40-41 (1999).Google Scholar

11 Michael Douglas, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Northern Shell plc v. Hello! Ltd., 2 WLR 992 (2001).Google Scholar

12 Bonner, D. & Graham, C., The Human Rights Act 1998: The Story So Far, 8 European Public Law 177, 183 (2002); Alder, J., Constitutional Law and Administrative Law 431 (5th ed., 2005).Google Scholar

13 Grote, supra note 4, 309, 339.Google Scholar

14 Beloff, M. J., What Does It All Mean?, in The Human Rights Act 1998: What It Means. The Incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the Legal Order of the United Kingdom 11, 28 (L. Betten ed., 1999).Google Scholar

15 Wadham, J., Mountfield, H., Edmundson, A. & Gallagher, C., Blackstone's Guide to the Human Rights Act 1998 51 (4th ed., 2007).Google Scholar

16 Loughlin, supra note 4, 217, 262 (paragraph 84); M. Hunt, Using Human Rights in English Courts (1997).Google Scholar

17 Birkinshaw & Künnecke, supra note 6, 107, 128 (paragraph 49).Google Scholar

18 Coppel, J., The Human Rights Act 1998: Enforcing the European Convention in the Domestic Courts 282 (paragraph 10.10) (1999); see generally Liddy, J., The Concept of Family Life under the ECHR, 3 European Human Rights Law Review 5-25 (1998).Google Scholar

19 See for example Eur. Court, H.R., Marckx v. Belgium, Judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A No. 31, 6 EuGRZ 454 (paragraph 31) (1979); Eur. Court, H.R., Johnston et. al. v. Ireland, Judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A, No. 112, 14 EuGRZ 313 (paragraph 55) (1987) see comments above; Eur. Court, H.R., Keegan v. Ireland, Judgment of 26 May 1994, Series A, No. 290, 22 EuGRZ 113 (paragraph 44) (1995) see comments above; Eur. Court H.R., Elsholz v. Germany, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII 29 EuGRZ 595 (paragraph 43) (2002) see comments above; Eur. Court, H.R., Kroon et al. v. Netherlands, Judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A, No. 297-C, (paragraph 30); Eur. Court, H.R., X., Y. and Z. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 22 April 1997 No. 21830/93, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II, 24 EHRR 143 (paragraph 36) (1997) see comments above; Eur. Court H.R., Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal Judgment of 21 December 1999, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1999-IX, 22; C. Grabenwarter, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 2ND ed. 183 (paragraph 16) (2005); P. De Hert, Artikel 8: Recht on privacy, in Handboek EVRM, Part 2, Vol. 1, 705, 742-744 (J. Vande Lanotte & Y. Haeck eds., 2004); Villiger, M. E., Expulsion and the Right to Respect for Private and Family Life (Article 8 of the Convention), in Protecting Human Rights: The European Dimension – Studies in Honour of G. J. Wiarda 657, 658 (F. Matscher & H. Petzold eds., 1988); V. Coussirat-Coustère, Famille et Convention Européenne des Droits de l'Homme, in Protection des droits de l'homme – La perspective européenne. Mélanges ä la mémoire de Rolv Ryssdal 281, 288-289 (P. Mahoney et al. eds., 2000); M. Grigolo, Sexualities and the ECHR: Introducing the Universal Sexual Legal Subject, 14 EJIL 1023, 1037-1038 and 1042 (2003).Google Scholar

20 See, for example, Coppel, supra note 18, 284 (paragraph 10.12).Google Scholar

21 Eur. Court, H.R., Marckx v. Belgium, Judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A 31, 6 EuGRZ 454 (paragraph 31) (1979); see further X. Arzoz Santisteban, Articulo 8: Derecho al respeto de la vida privada y familiar, in Convenio europeo de derechos humanos 254, 300-301 (I. Lasagabaster Herrarte ed., 2004); M. E. Villiger, Handbuch der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention 366 (paragraph 572) (2nd ed., 1999).Google Scholar

22 Dijk, P. van & van Hoof, G. J. H., Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights 504 (3rd ed, 1998); De Hert, supra note 19, 746-748 (paragraph 29); Grosz, S., Beatson, J. & Duffy, P., Human Rights: The 1998 Act and the European Convention 270 (paragraph 17) (2000).Google Scholar

23 Eur. Court, H.R., Marckx v. Belgium, Judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A, No. 31, 6 EuGRZ 454 (paragraph 31) (1979).Google Scholar

24 See Eur. Court H.R, X., Y. and Z. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 22 April 1997 No. 21830/93, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II 619, 24 EHRR 143 (paragraph 37) (1997); Eur. Court, H.R., Söderbäck v. Sweden, Judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VII, paragraph 33.Google Scholar

25 Grabenwarter, supra note 19, 184 (paragraph 18); J. F. Kj⊘lbro, Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonvention 440 (2005); R. de Mello, Human Rights Act 1998 119 (2000); the question whether the foster mother is protected by Article 8 ECHR was let open with regard to “family life” but scrutinized under “private life” in a the case where a foster mother for years had a child in her care and had reached an intense relationship with it by European Commission of Human Rights, X. v. Switzerland, Judgment of 10 July 1978 No. 8257/78, 13 Decisions and Reports 248, 253 (1979).Google Scholar

26 See, I. Fahrenhorst, Familienrecht und Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 282 (1994).Google Scholar

27 Eur. Court, H.R., Johansen v. Norway, Judgment of 7 August 1996, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, 52; Eur. Court H.R., Bronda v. Italy, Judgment of 9 June 1998, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV, 51; Eur. Court, H.R., Elsholz v. Germany, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 29 EuGRZ 595 (paragraph 43) (2002); Grosz et al., supra note 22, 273-274 (paragraph 24).Google Scholar

28 See European Commission of Human Rights, X. v. Germany, Judgment of 2 May 1978, No. 7770/77, 14 Decisions and Reports 175, 176 (1980); L. Wildhaber, Article 8, in Internationaler Kommentar zur Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, 145 (paragraph 400) (loose-leaf book, W. Karl ed., state: August 2007); Breitenmoser, S., Der Schutz der Privatsphäre GEMÄß Art. 8 EMRK 120 (1986); Brötel, A., Der Anspruch auf Achtung des Familienlebens 318 (1991).Google Scholar

29 Eur. Court, H.R., Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 201-216; see also Eur. Court, H.R., Olsson v. Sweden (No. 1), Judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A No. 130, 80; M. Palm-Risse, Der völkerrechtliche Schutz von Ehe und Familie 276-278 (1990).Google Scholar

30 Frowein, J. A., Artikel 8 (Privat- und Familienleben), in Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention. Kommentar. 337, 352 (paragraph 22) (2nd ed., J. A. Frowein & W. Peukert eds., 1996).Google Scholar

31 Eur. Court H.R., Eriksson v. Sweden, Judgment of 22 June 1989, Series A, No. 156, paragraph 71; for analysis of this decision, see Brötel, supra note 28, 403-409; see also Eur. Court H.R., Andersson v. Sweden, Judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A, No. 226-A 95; Eur. Court H.R., Rieme v. Sweden, Judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A, No. 226-B 69, 73; Grosz et al., supra note 22, 276 (paragraph 29).Google Scholar

32 Eur. Court H.R., Johansen v. Norway, Judgment of 7 August 1996, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, 52; Eur. Court H.R., Bronda v. Italy, Judgment of 9 June 1998, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV, 51; Eur. Court H.R., Elsholz v. Germany, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 29 EuGRZ 595 (paragraph 43) (2002). See also E. Benda, Verkehrtes zum Verkehrsrecht, 29 EuGRZ 1-3 (2002).Google Scholar

33 Grabenwarter, supra note 19, 190 (paragraph 27).Google Scholar

34 van Dijk & van Hoof, supra note 22, 510.Google Scholar

35 Breitenmoser, supra note 28, 120; Brötel, supra note 28, 189-190; Palm-Risse, supra note 29, 276; Wildhaber, supra note 28, 143 (paragraph 400).Google Scholar

36 Grabenwarter, supra note 19, 190 (paragraph 27).Google Scholar

37 See Wiederin, E., Migranten und Grundrechte 11-15 (2003); Frowein, supra note 30, 337, 354-358 (paragraphs. 24-26); Palm-Risse, supra note 29, 282-309; Villiger, supra note 19, 657, 659–660.Google Scholar

38 See Eur. Court H.R., Abdulaziz et al. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A, No. 94), 12 EuGRZ 567 (paragraph 68) (1985); Eur. Court H.R., Boultif v. Switzerland, Judgment of 2 August 2001, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2001-IX, 40; Eur. Court H.R., Yilmaz v. Turkey, Judgment of 17 April 2003 No. 52853/99, 36; Frowein, supra note 30, 337, 354-356 (paragraph 24).Google Scholar

39 Eur. Court H.R., Olsson v. Sweden (No. 2), Judgment of 27 November 1992, Series A, No. 250, 90; Eur. Court H.R., Johansen v. Norway, Judgment of 7 August 1996, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, 52; Eur. Court H.R., Elsholz v. Germany, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 29 EuGRZ 595 (paragraph 50) (2002). See Villiger, supra note 21, 367-368 (paragraphs 573-574).Google Scholar

40 Eur. Court H.R., Andersson v. Sweden, Judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A, No. 226-A at 95; Eur. Court H.R., Johansen v. Norway, Judgment of 7 August 1996, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, 78; Eur. Court H.R., Elsholz v. Germany, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 29 EuGRZ 595 (paragraph 48) (2002); Eur. Court H.R. Sommerfeld v. Germany, Judgment of 8 July 2003, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2003-VIII, 64. See also Breitenmoser, supra note 28, 121-122; Wildhaber, supra note 28, 143 (paragraph 401).Google Scholar

41 Eur. Court H.R., Johansen v. Norway, Judgment of 7 August 1996, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, 78; Eur. Court H.R., Elsholz v. Germany, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 29 EuGRZ 595 (paragraph 50) (2002); Eur. Court H.R., Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 169; Eur. Court H.R. (Grand Chamber), Sommerfeld v. Germany, Judgment of 8 July 2003, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2003-VIII, 64.Google Scholar

42 Eur. Court H.R., Olsson v. Sweden (No. 1), Judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A, No. 130, 72; Eur. Court H.R., Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 148; Eur. Court H.R., K. and T. v. Finland, Judgment of 12 July 2001, No. 25702/95, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2001-VII, 168; see also Palm-Risse, supra note 29, 279–282.Google Scholar

43 Eur. Court H.R., P., C. and S. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 16 July 2002, No. 65647/00, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2002-VI, 116; Eur. Court H.R., Haase v. Germany, Judgment of 8 April 2004, No. 11057/02, 57 NJW 3401, 102 (2004).Google Scholar

44 Bîrsan, C., Convent̗ia europeană a drepturilor omului, Vol. 1, 638 (paragraph 169) (2005).Google Scholar

45 Schumann, E., Biologisches Band oder soziale Bindung? – Vorgaben der EMRK und des deutschen Rechts bei Pflegekindverhältnissen, 54 RdJB 165, 167 (2006).Google Scholar

46 Eur. Court H.R., Olsson v. Sweden (No. 1), Judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A, No. 130, 81; Eur. Court H.R., Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 169; Eur. Court H.R., K. and T. v. Finland, Judgment of 12 July 2001, No. 25702/95, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2001-VII, 178; Eur. Court H.R., Kutzner v. Germany, Judgment of 26 February 2002, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2002-I, 29 EuGRZ 244 (paragraph 76) (2002); Eur. Court H.R., Covezzi and Morselli v. Italy, Judgment of 9 May 2003, No. 52763/99 (paragraph 118).Google Scholar

47 Eur. Court H.R., Olsson v. Sweden (No. 1), Judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A, No. 130, 81; Eur. Court H.R., Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy, Judgment of 13 July 2000, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VIII, 174. See also Palm-Risse, supra note 29, 281.Google Scholar

48 Eur. Court H.R., Boultif v. Switzerland, Judgment of 2 August 2001, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2001-IX, 39; Wadham et al., supra note 15, 171 (paragraph 8.385).Google Scholar

49 Eur. Court H.R., Abdulaziz et al. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A, No. 94, 12 EuGRZ 567 (paragraph 68) (1985); Eur. Court H.R., Gül v. Switzerland, Judgment of 19 February 1996, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I, 38.Google Scholar

50 See also Eur. Court H.R., Abdulaziz et al. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A, No. 94, 12 EuGRZ 567 (paragraph 67) (1985); Eur. Court H.R., Moustaquim v. Belgium, Judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A, No. 193, 43; B. Weichselbaum, Die Regelung des Familiennachzugs in Österreich im Lichte der Vorgaben der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, 23 ZAR 359, 361 (2003).Google Scholar

51 Eur. Court H.R., Gül v. Switzerland, Judgment of 19 February 1996, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I, 38; Frowein, supra note 30, 337, 357-358 (paragraph 26).Google Scholar

52 See, for example., Eur. Court H.R., Rees v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A, No. 106, 37; Eur. Court H.R., Powell and Rayner v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A, No. 172, 41; Eur. Court H.R., Guerra v. Italy, Judgment of 19 February 1998, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, 58; Eur. Court H.R. (Grand Chamber), Hatton et al. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 8 July 2003, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2003-VIII, 95; van Dijk & van Hoof, supra note 22, 534–535. See also Brötel, supra note 28, 69-73; Bîrsan, supra note 44, 595-596 (paragraph 10); Coppel, supra note 18, 286-287 (paragraphs 10.19-10.22).Google Scholar

53 See Eur. Court H.R., Marckx v. Belgium, Judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A, No. 31, 6 EuGRZ 454 (paragraph 45) (1979); Eur. Court H.R., Johnston et al. v. Ireland, Judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A, No. 112, 14 EuGRZ 313 (paragraph 74) (1987); Eur. Court H.R. (Grand Chamber), Sommerfeld v. Germany, Judgment of 8 July 2003, Report of Judgments and Decisions 2003-VIII, 86.Google Scholar

54 Palm-Risse, supra note 29, 133–134.Google Scholar

55 Grabenwarter, supra note 19, 209 (paragraph 62).Google Scholar

56 European Commission of Human Rights, X. and Y. v. Switzerland, Judgment of 3 October 1978, No. 8166/78, 13 Decisions and Reports 241, 244 (1979); Palm-Risse, supra note 29, 136.Google Scholar

57 European Commission of Human Rights, X. and Y. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 15 December 1977, No. 7229/75, 12 Decisions and Reports 32, 34 (1978); European Commission of Human Rights, X. v. Netherlands, Judgment of 10 March 1981, No. 8896/80, 24 Decisions and Reports 176, 177 (1981). See also Kj⊘lbro, supra note 25, 599; Bîrsan, supra note 44, 855-856 (paragraph 31); de Mello, supra note 25, 165 (paragraph 2.212).Google Scholar

58 Grabenwarter, supra note 19, 210 (paragraph 63); van Dijk & van Hoof, supra note 22, 611; Fahrenhorst, I., Fortpflanzungstechnologien und Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, 15 EuGRZ 125-131 (1988).Google Scholar

59 European Commission of Human Rights, X. v. Belgium and Netherlands, Judgment of 10 December 1975, No. 6482/74, 7 Decisions and Reports 75, 77 (1977); European Commission of Human Rights, Di Lazzaro v. Italy, Judgment of 10 July 1997, No. 31924/96, 90-B Decisions and Reports 134, 139 (1997). See also M. Kirilova Eriksson, The Right to Marry and to Found a Family 153 (1990).Google Scholar

60 Eur. Court H.R. (Grand Chamber), Evans v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 10 April 2007, No. 6339/05, 90, 92.Google Scholar

61 Wadham et al., supra note 15, 215 (paragraphs 8.659-8.660).Google Scholar

62 In this direction Grabenwarter, supra note 19, 209 (paragraph 62); de Mello, supra note 25, 165 (paragraph 2.211); Kirilova Eriksson, supra note 59, 162–163.Google Scholar

63 See also Grosz et al., supra note 22, 277 (paragraph 33).Google Scholar

64 van Dijk & van Hoof, supra note 22, 612; Kirilova Eriksson, supra note 59, 163-164; for a critique, see T. Meron, Human Rights Law-making in the United Nations 72 (1986); J. Greenberg, Race, Sex, and Religious Discrimination in International Law, in Human Rights in International Law, Vol. 2, 307, 330 (T. Meron ed., 1984).Google Scholar

65 European Commission of Human Rights, X. v. Germany, Judgment of 13 December 1979, No. 8410/78, 18 Decisions and Reports 216, 220 (1980).Google Scholar

66 van Dijk & van Hoof, supra note 22, 711-712; Brötel, supra note 28, 108–111.Google Scholar

67 Grabenwarter, supra note 19, 377 (paragraph 9).Google Scholar

68 See Welstead, M., England and Wales: The Influence of Human Rights and Cultural Issues, in The International Survey of Family Law 143, 146-147 (A. Bainham ed., 2003).Google Scholar

69 1 FLR 241 (2001); see also Re S. (Leave to Remove from Jurisdiction: Securing Return from Holiday) 2 FLR 507 (2001).Google Scholar

70 EWCA Civ 166 (2001); see also Re X. and Y. (Leave to Remove from Jurisdiction: No Order Principle) 2 FLR 118 (2001).Google Scholar

71 1 WLR 1469 (1970).Google Scholar

72 Taken up later, for example, by the judgment in Re B. (Removal from Jurisdiction); Re S. (Removal from Jurisdiction) 2 FLR 1043 (2003).Google Scholar

73 See Welstead, supra note 68, 143, 148–150.Google Scholar

74 2 FLR 1122 (2001).Google Scholar

75 2 FLR 1122, 1139 (2001).Google Scholar

76 See S. Mückl, Kooperation oder Konfrontation? – Das Verhältnis zwischen Bundesverfassungsgericht und Europäischem Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, 44 Der Staat 403, 407 (2005); B. Schaffarzik, Europäische Menschenrechte unter der Ägide des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, DÖV 860, 861 (2005); K.-P. Sommermann, Offene Staatlichkeit: Deutschland, in von Bogdandy, Cruz Villalón & Huber eds., supra note 6, 3, 30 (paragraph 56).Google Scholar

77 See Gesetz über die Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten of 7 August 1952, BGBl. II 685 (1952), in particular Article 2 paragraph 1.Google Scholar

78 In general about the implementation of international agreement in the German legal area, see A. von Bogdandy & D. Zacharias, Zum Status der Weltkulturerbekonvention im deutschen Rechtsraum, 26 NVwZ 527, 528-530 (2007) with references.Google Scholar

79 See, for example, R. Echterhölter, Die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention im Rahmen der verfassungsmäßigen Ordnung, 10 JZ 689, 691-692 (1955); A. Bleckmann, Verfassungsrang der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention?, 21 EuGRZ 149, 154-155 (1994).Google Scholar

80 For more details on this type of constitution and its differences with respect to other types, see K. Loewenstein, Verfassungslehre 152-157 (4TH ed., 2000).Google Scholar

81 For details on the above-mentioned approaches K.-P. Sommermann, see Völkerrechtlich garantierte Menschenrechte als Maßstab der Verfassungskonkretisierung, 114 AöR 391, 408-410 (1989); R. Uerpmann, Die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention und die deutsche Rechtsprechung 102-108, 176-187 (1993); N. Sternberg, Der Rang von Menschenrechtsverträgen im deutschen Recht unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Art. 1 Abs. 2 GG 40-53, 136-176 (1999); F. Hoffmeister, Die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention als Grundrechtsverfassung und ihre Bedeutung in Deutschland, 40 Der Staat 349, 365-367 (2001); M. Ruffert, Die europäische Menschenrechtskonvention und innerstaatliches Recht, 34 EuGRZ 245, 246-247 (2007).Google Scholar

82 See Sternberg, supra note 81, 222, with references in footnote 853.Google Scholar

83 BVerfGE 74, 357, 370; see also Sommermann, supra note 81, 391, 414-418 and 219-230; Hoffmeister, supra note 81, 349, 367–369.Google Scholar

84 BVerfGE 111, 307, 329; see also K. Grupp & U. Stelkens, Zur Berücksichtigung der Gewährleistungen der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention bei der Auslegung deutschen Rechts, 120 DVBl. 133-143 (2005); S. Kadelbach, Der Status der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention im deutschen Recht, Jura 480-486 (2005).Google Scholar

85 Sommermann, supra note 76, 3, 31-32 (paragraph 58).Google Scholar

86 BVerfGE 80, 81, 95; 57, 170, 178.Google Scholar

87 BVerfGE 48, 327, 339.Google Scholar

88 BVerfGE 18, 97, 106.Google Scholar

89 BVerfGE 79, 256, 267.Google Scholar

90 See Schmitt-Kammler, A, Art. 6, in Grundgesetz. Kommentar 344, 352 (4th ed., M. Sachs ed., 2007); Gröschner, R., Art. 6, in Grundgesetz. Kommentar, Vol. 1 (2nd ed., H. Dreier ed., 2004) 751, 790.Google Scholar

91 See, for example, Schwab, D., Familienrecht im Umbruch, FamRZ 513-518 (1995); G. Robbers, Art. 6, in. Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, Vol. 1, 671, 693-694 (5th ed., H. von Mangoldt, F. Klein & C. Starck eds., 2005); Burgi, M., Art. 6, in, Berliner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, Vol. 1 (loose-leaf book, K. H. Friauf & W. Höfling eds., state: September 2007), 1, 21-23 (paragraph 21).Google Scholar

92 BVerfGE 6, 55, 76; 6, 386, 388; 55, 114, 126-127; 81, 1, 6.Google Scholar

93 BVerfGE 91, 130, 134. See also U. Di Fabio, Der Schutz von Ehe und Familie: Verfassungsentscheidung für die vitale Gesellschaft, NJW 993, 994 (2003).Google Scholar

94 BVerfGE 21, 329, 353.Google Scholar

95 See Robbers, supra note 91, 671, 698-126 (paragraphs 112-125); Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 354-355 (paragraph 22); Gröschner, supra note 90, 751, 799 (paragraphs. 93-94).Google Scholar

96 BVerfGE 76, 1; 80, 81, 92.Google Scholar

97 Federal Constitutional Court, NJW 3155 (1994).Google Scholar

98 See Marauhn, T. & Meljnik, K., Privat- und Familienleben, in EMRK/GG. Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz 744, 766 (R. Grote & T. Marauhn eds., 2006).Google Scholar

99 BVerfGE 6, 55, 72.Google Scholar

100 See BVerfGE 80, 81, 92. In detail: Mager, U., Einrichtungsgarantien 206-211 (2003); Erichsen, H.-U., Elternrecht – Kindeswohl – Staatsgewalt 24-27 (1985).Google Scholar

101 BVerfGE 6, 55, 72–73.Google Scholar

102 See Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 359 (paragraph 30).Google Scholar

103 BVerfGE 6, 55, 76; see in detail M. Tünnemann, Der verfassungsrechtliche Schutz der Familie und die Förderung der Kindererziehung im Rahmen des staatlichen Kinderleistungsausgleichs 123-144 (2002).Google Scholar

104 BVerfGE 21, 1, 6; 97, 332, 349; 106, 166, 177; 107, 205, 213; 110, 412, 436; Federal Constitutional Court, NJW 1413, 1415 and 1417, 1418 (2005); D. Coester-Waltjen, Art. 6, in Grundgesetz-Kommentar, Vol. 1 (I. von Münch & P. Kunig eds., 5th ed., 2000), 479, 494 (paragraph 35).Google Scholar

105 BVerfGE 23, 258, 264; 103, 242, 259; 110, 412, 445.Google Scholar

106 BVerfGE 82, 60, 81; Federal Constitutional Court, FamRZ 541 (1997).Google Scholar

107 See the references at Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 360-363 (paragraphs 35-42); Gröschner, supra note 90, 751, 794-798 (paragraphs 86-91).Google Scholar

108 BVerfGE 99, 216, 234.Google Scholar

109 See Tünnemann, supra note 103, 138–139.Google Scholar

110 Federal Ministry for Work and Social Order, Einkommensbezogenes Sozialleistungsrecht. Forschungsbericht No. 256, 397-398 (1996).Google Scholar

111 Tünnemann, supra note 103, 139.Google Scholar

112 Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 380 (paragraph 84); Gröschner, supra note 90, 751, 821 (paragraph 144).Google Scholar

113 BVerfGE 76, 1, 48.Google Scholar

114 See Federal Social Court, NJW 2719 (1981); BAGE 43, 205, 209; Higher Administrative Court of Berlin, 19 NVwZ 221 (2000); Coester-Waltjen, supra note 104, at 479, 522-523 (paragraph 104), I. Richter, Art. 6, in Kommentar zum Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Alternativkommentar), Vol. 1 (3rd ed., loose-leaf book, E. Denninger, W. Hoffmann-Riem, H.-P. Schneider & E. Stein eds., state: August 2002), 1, 60 (paragraph 54); differentiating Robbers, supra note 91, 671, 731.Google Scholar

115 See T. Aubel, Der verfassungsrechtliche Mutterschutz. Ein Beitrag zur Dogmatik der Leistungsgrundrechte am Beispiel des Art. 6 Abs. 4 GG 101-124 (2003); Stern, K., Das Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Vol. IV/1, 555-556 (2006); Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 380 (paragraph 84).Google Scholar

116 Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 378 (paragraph 79).Google Scholar

117 Gröschner, supra note 90, 751, 821 (paragraph 144).Google Scholar

118 Federal Constitutional Court, NJW 179 (1987); M. Sachs, Grundrechte 340 (paragraph 54) (2nd ed., 2003); Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 380 (paragraph 84).Google Scholar

119 Coester-Waltjen, supra note 104, 479, 523 (paragraph 104).Google Scholar

120 See Tünnemann, supra note 103, 189; Stern, supra note 115, 557-559; Sachs, supra note 118, 340 (paragraph 54); H. F. Zacher, Elternrecht, in Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Vol. VI, 265, 321 (paragraph 115) (2nd ed., J. Isensee & P. Kirchhof eds., 2001); for a more extensive view, refer to Robbers, supra note 91, 671, 729 (paragraph 278) and 731 (paragraph 292).Google Scholar

121 Tünnemann, supra note 103, 189.Google Scholar

122 See Berghahn, S., Ehe und Familie in der Verfassungsdiskussion – vom institutionellen zum sozialen Grundrechtsverständnis?, 26 KJ 397, 400 (1993).Google Scholar

123 With respect to the time dimension of Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Basic Law, see Aubel, supra note 115, 127-139 with extensive references; Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 378-379 (paragraph 79).Google Scholar

124 BVerfGE 60, 68, 74.Google Scholar

125 BVerfGE 85, 360, 372.Google Scholar

126 BVerfGE 60, 68, 74 with reference to BVerfGE 32, 273, 277; 52, 357, 365; 55, 154, 157.Google Scholar

127 See Gröschner, supra note 90, 751, 819 (paragraph 140).Google Scholar

128 BVerfGE 60, 68, 74.Google Scholar

129 BVerfGE 32, 273, 279.Google Scholar

130 See Sachs, supra note 118, 341 (paragraph 57).Google Scholar

131 BVerfGE 32, 273, 277.Google Scholar

132 Zacher, supra note 120, 265, 323 (paragraph 118).Google Scholar

133 See BVerfGE 85, 360, 372 with reference to BVerfGE 32, 273, 277.Google Scholar

134 BVerfGE 65, 104, 113; Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 379 (paragraph 82).Google Scholar

135 Hesse, K., Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 187-188 (paragraph 436) (20th ed., 1999); Robbers, supra note 91, 671, 730 (paragraph 287).Google Scholar

136 BVerfGE 32, 273, 277; see also BVerfGE 47, 1, 20; 52, 357, 365; Aubel, supra note 115, 27–79.Google Scholar

137 Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 379 (paragraph 81).Google Scholar

138 Gröschner, supra note 90, 751, 820 (paragraph 142).Google Scholar

139 See BVerwGE 47, 23, 27.Google Scholar

140 Aubel, supra note 115, 93–94.Google Scholar

141 BVerfGE 88, 203, 296; 103, 89, 102; Robbers, supra note 91, 671, 733 (paragraph 303); Schmitt-Kammler, supra note 90, 344, 380 (paragraph 84); Sachs, supra note 118, 341 (paragraph 58); Stern, supra note 115, 554; Zacher, supra note 120, 265, 323-324 (paragraph 119).Google Scholar

142 Gröschner, supra note 90, at 751, 821 (paragraph 143).Google Scholar

143 Marauhn & Meljnik, supra note 98, at 744, 763 (paragraph 18). See also J. Kersten, Demographie als Verwaltungsaufgabe, 40 Die Verwaltung 309, 319 (2007).Google Scholar

144 See Council of the European Union, Presidency Conclusions of 21/22 June 2007, Doc. 11177/07, 17 (paragraph 9).Google Scholar

145 See Tettinger, P. J., Art. 7, in Europäische Grundrechte-Charta 289, 291 (paragraph 1) (P. J. Tettinger & K. Stern eds., 2006); Rengeling, H.-W. & Szczekalla, P., Grundrechte in der Europäischen Union 460 (paragraph 656) (2004); Panebianco, M., Repertorio della Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell'Unione europea 113 (2001).Google Scholar

146 Tettinger, P. J., Art. 9, in Europäische Grundrechte-Charta 314, 318 (paragraph 26) (P. J. Tettinger & K. Stern eds., 2006); Bernsdorff, N., Art. 9, in Kommentar zur Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union 165, 169-170 (paragraphs 13-14) (J. Meyer ed., 2003).Google Scholar

147 Tettinger, supra note 146, 314, 319 (paragraph 27).Google Scholar

148 Nußberger, A., Art. 23, in Europäische Grundrechte-Charta 492, 507 (paragraph 81) (P. J. Tettinger & K. Stern eds., 2006).Google Scholar

149 See ECJ, Case C-177/88, Dekker, E.C.R. I-3941 (1990); Case C-421/92, Habermann-Beltermann, E.C.R. I-1657 (1994); Case C-32/93, Webb, E.C.R. I-3567 (1994). See also M. Coen, Art. 141, in EU- und EG-Vertrag (4th ed., C. O. Lenz/K.-D. Borchardt eds., 2006) 1600, 1623 (paragraph 40).Google Scholar

150 ECJ, Case C-207/98, Mahlburg, E.C.R. I-594 (2000); Case C-177/88, Dekker, E.C.R. I-3941 (1990); Case C-394/96, Brown, E.C.R I-4185 (1998).Google Scholar

151 ECJ, Case C-400/95, Larsson, E.C.R. I-2757 (1997).Google Scholar

152 See Caracciolo di Torella, E. & Masselot, A., Pregnancy, maternity and the organisation of family life: an attempt to classify the case law of the Court of Justice, 26 E.L.Rev. 239, 250 (2001).Google Scholar

153 ECJ, Case C-432, Gillespie, E.C.R. I-475 (1996).Google Scholar

154 Tettinger, P. J., Art. 33, in Europäische Grundrechte-Charta 145, 563, 564 (paragraph 5) (P. J. Tettinger & K. Stern eds., 2006); Riedel, E., Art. 33, in Kommentar zur Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union 146, 382, 387 (paragraph 13) (J. Meyer ed., 2003).Google Scholar

155 Tettinger, supra note 154, 563, 565 (paragraph 7).Google Scholar

156 Tettinger, supra note 154, 563, 565 (paragraph 13).Google Scholar

157 For further details about the Charter as concretization of common European values see, for example, Schmitz, T., Die Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union als Konkretisierung der gemeinsamen europäischen Werte, in Die Europäische Union als Wertegemeinschaft 73-97 (D. Blumenwitz, G. H. Gornig & D. Murswiek eds., 2005), with an English abstract.Google Scholar

158 See Nußberger, A., Art. 34, in Europäische Grundrechte-Charta 566, 575 (paragraphs 53-54) (P. J. Tettinger & K. Stern eds., 2006).Google Scholar

159 Council of the European Union, supra note 144, 25 (at footnote 3).Google Scholar