Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:48:50.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protego et obligo. Afghanistan and the paradox of sovereignty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Michael Bothe  and
Andreas Fischer-Lescano

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Governance in Afghanistan is a complex matter. Afghanistan today is not only the territory of Pashtuns, Tajiks, Northern Alliances, Taliban and Al Qaeda, all of whom are competing for power. Afghanistan is also a social field of other political actors like Germany, the UK, the US, the UN and of the “Six plus Two” group. Is it governance without government?

Type
Research Article
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 3 , Issue 9: Special issue - The War on Terror - One Year On , September 2002 , E5
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

Niklas Luhmann, ”Der Staat des politischen Systems“, in: Politik der Gesellschaft, 189 et seq. (2000).Google Scholar
Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri, Empire (2001).Google Scholar
http://www.un.org/News/dh/latest/afghan/sixplus.htm.Google Scholar
Declaration of Tashkent, 9 July 1999, http://www.uzland.uz/news/text040.htm.Google Scholar
Declaration on the Situation in Afghanistan by the Foreign Ministers and other senior representatives of the “Six plus Two, 12 November 2001, http://www.un.org/News/dh/latest/afghan/sixplus.htm.Google Scholar
A/56/432-S/2001/934.Google Scholar
http://www.uno.de/frieden/afghanistan/talks/agreement.htm.Google Scholar
Annex IV, Composition of the interim administration.Google Scholar
Bonn Agreement, I.3.Google Scholar
Bonn Agreement, preamble.Google Scholar
S/RES 1386 (2001).Google Scholar
SEC/RES 1386 (2001), cif. 4.Google Scholar
SC/RES 1373 (2001).Google Scholar
See the postmodern interpretation of this principle by Gunther Teubner, ”Des Königs viele Leiber. Die Selbstdekonstruktion der Hierarchie des Rechts, “ in: H. Brunkhorst & M. Kettner (eds.), Globalisierung und Demokratie: Wirtschaft, Recht, Medien, 240 et seq., 264 (2000).Google Scholar
In the Tashkent Declaration 1999 and the Security Council Resolutions 1376 (2001), 1267 (1999), 1214 (1998), 1193 (1998) and 1386 (2001), that all reaffirmed “the strong commitment to sovereignty of Afghanistan.Google Scholar
A/56/681-S/2001/1157.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, « Otobiographien. Die Lehre Nietzsches und die Politik des Eigennamens”, in: Jacques Derrida & Friedrich Kittler, Nietzsche - Politik des Eigennamens. Wie man abschafft, wovon man spricht, 9 et seq. (2000).Google Scholar
http://www.gazette.de/Archiv/Gazette-November2001/Jirga.html: According to the legends the first Loya Jirga came together 5,000 years before. It was seated at the river Oxus (Amu Darja).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft, 9 Rechtshistorisches Journal, 176 et seq. (1990); idem., Das Recht der Gesellschaft, 478 (1995).Google Scholar
SEC/RES 1386 (2001), preamble.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts (2. Aufl., 1928); idem., Souveränität, in: K. Strupp (ed.), Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts, Vol. 2, 554 et seq. (1925); Gustav Radbruch, Rechtsphilosophie (1932), R. Dreier (ed.), 185 (1999); Georges Scelle, Précis de droit des gens, vol. I, Principes et systématique, 13 et seq. (1932) writes: “Il est en effet impossible de concevoir dans une měme société deux souverainetés coexistantes, sans quoi elles entreraient en conflit et chacune d'elles, pour rester souveraine, devrait posséder le pouvoir déterminateur de la compétence de l'autre. Mais il est également impossible de concevoir la souveraineté dans un milieu intersocial.”Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Schrift zum ewigen Frieden, in: Werkausgabe, W. Weischedel (ed.), Vol. 11, (8th ed. 1991).Google Scholar
Allott, Philip, The Emerging Universal Legal System, 3 International Law Forum (2001), 12 et seq., 16; Jochen A. Frowein, Konstitutionalisierung des Völkerrechts, in: Völkerrecht und Internationales Privatrecht in einem sich globalisierenden internationalen System, 39 Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft des Völkerrechts GVR (2000) 427 et seq.; cf. also Christian Walter, Die EMRK als Konstitutionalisierungsprozeß, ZaöRV/Heidelberg Journal of International Law (1999), 961 et seq.; Robert Uerpmann, Internationales Verfassungsrecht, 56 Juristen Zeitung (2001), 565 et seq.; Bardo Faßbender, The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community, 36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (1998), 529 et seq.; idem., UN Security Council Reform and the Right of Veto: A Constitutional Perspective (1998); Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz, The “Federal Analogy” and the UN Charter Interpretation: A Crucial Issue, 8 EJIL (1997), 1 et seq; Pierre-Marie Dupuy, The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited, 1 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (1997), 1 et seq; Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, How to Reform the UN System? Constitutionalism, International Law, and International Organizations, 10 Leiden Journal of International Law (1997), 421 et seq.; Erik Suy, “The Constitutional Character of Constituent Treaties of International Organizations and the Hierarchy of Norms,” in: U. Beyerlin, et al. (eds.), Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung. Völkerrecht - Europarecht - Staatsrecht, Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt, 267 et seq. (1995); Georg Nolte, Kosovo und Konstitutionalisierung: Zur humanitären Intervention der NATO-Staaten, 59 ZaöRV/Heidelberg Journal of International Law (1999), 941, 957 et seq.; see also Rudolf Geiger, Kaleidoscope. The German border guard cases and international human rights, 9 EJIL (1998), 540 et seq.; Michael Reisman, Unilateral Action and the Transformations of the World Constitutive Process: The Special Problem of Humanitarian Intervention, 11 EJIL (2000), 3 et seq.; Dino Kritsiotis, Reappraising Policy Objections to Humanitarian Intervention, 19 Michigan Journal of International Law (1998), 1005 et seq.; Christian Tomuschat, “International Law as the Constitution of Mankind,” in: UN (ed.), International Law on the Eve of the Twenty-first Century, 47 (1997); idem., Die Internationale Gemeinschaft, 33 Archiv des Völkerrechts (1995), 1 et seq., 17; idem., Obligations arising for States without or against their Will, Recueil des Cours (1993) IV, 195 et seq., 216; Otto Kimminich, Einführung in das Völkerrecht, 94 et seq.; Konrad Ginther, ”Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft im Lichte der Entscheidung des Internationalen Gerichtshofes im sogenannten Südwestafrika-Streit“, in R. Marcic et al. (eds.), Internationale Festschrift für Alfred Verdroß, 91 et seq., (1971); Hauke Brunkhorst, Solidarität, Von der Bürgerfreundschaft zur globalen Rechtsgenossenschaft, (2002); Hardt & Negri, Empire (footnote 2, above).Google Scholar
Walker, Neil, The idea of constitutional pluralism, EUI Working Paper, LAW No. 2002/1, 8.Google Scholar
On the terminology of a “global remedies rule” see: Andreas Fischer-Lescano, Globalverfassung: Verfassung der Weltgesellschaft, 88 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (2002), 349 et seq.Google Scholar
Ashby vs. White (1703, quot: Constantine vs. Imperial Hotels (1944), 1 KB 693, 705); see also David Walker, The Law of Civil Remedies in Scotland, 12 (1974).Google Scholar
Megret, Frederic, ‘War'? Legal Semantics and the Move to Violence, http://www.ejil.org/forum_WTC.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Globalization or world society: How to conceive of modern society?, International Review of Sociology 7 (1997), 67.Google Scholar
Neves, Marcelo, Verfassung und Positivität des Rechts in der peripheren Moderne (1992).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martii, From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Argument, Helsinki (1989).Google Scholar