Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:40:28.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commutative rings whose quotients are Goldie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

Victor P. Camillo
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52240, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

All rings considered here have units. A (non-commutative) ring is right Goldieif it has no infinite direct sums of right ideals and has the ascending chain condition on annihilator right ideals. A right ideal A is an annihilator if it is of the form {aR/xa = 0 for all xX}, where X is some subset of R. Naturally, any noetherian ring is Goldie, but so is any commutative domain, so that the converse is not true. On the other hand, since any quotient ring of a noetherian ring is noetherian, it is true that every quotient is Goldie. A reasonable question therefore is the following: must a ring, such that every quotient ring is Goldie, be noetherian? We prove the following theorem:

Theorem. A commutative ring is noetherian if and only if every quotient is Goldie.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1975

References

REFERENCES

1.Anderson, F. and Fuller, K., Rings and Modules of Categories, Springer (to appear).Google Scholar
2.Goldie, A. W., Rings with Maximum Condition, Lecture notes (Yale University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
3.Jategonkar, A. V., Left Principal Ideal Rings, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Robson, J. C., Artinian Quotient Rings, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 17 (1967), 600616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Shock, R., Dual Generalizations of the Artinian and Noetherian Conditions, Pacific J. Math. (to appear).Google Scholar
6.Small, L. W., Orders in Artinian Rings, J. Algebra, 4 (1966), 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar