Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:03:56.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lattice subgroups of free congruence groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

A. W. Mason
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let Г(1) denote the homogeneous modular group of 2 × 2 matrices with integral entries and determinant 1. Let (1) be the inhomogeneous modular group of 2 × 2 integral matrices of determinant 1 in which a matrix is identified with its negative. (N), the principal congruence subgroup of level N, is the subgroup of (1) consisting of all T(1) for which T ≡ ± I (mod N), where N is a positive integer and I is the identity matrix. A subgroup of (1) is said to be a congruence group of level N if contains (N) and N is the least such integer. Similarly, we denote by Г(N) the principal congruence subgroup of level N of Г(1), consisting of those T∈(1) for which TI (mod N), and we say that a sub group of Г(1) is a congruence group of level N if contains Г (N) and N is minimal with respect to this property. In a recent paper [9] Rankin considered lattice subgroups of a free congruence subgroup of rank n of (1). By a lattice subgroup of we mean a subgroup of which contains the commutator group . In particular, he showed that, if is a congruence group of level N and if is a lattice congruence subgroup of of level qr, where r is the largest divisor of qr prime to N, then N divides q and r divides 12. He then posed the problem of finding an upper bound for the factor q. It is the purpose of this paper to find such an upper bound for q. We also consider bounds for the factor r.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1969

References

REFERENCES

1.Fricke, R., Über die Substitutionsgruppen, welche zu den aus Legendre'schen Integralmodul κ2(ω) gezogenen Wuhrzeln gehören, Math. Ann. 28 (1887), 99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lehner, Joseph, Discontinuous groups and automorphic functions, Mathematical Surveys, No. VIII, American Mathematical Society (Providence, R.I., 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.van Lint, J. H., On the multiplier system of the Riemann-Dedekind function ν, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 61 (=Indag. Math. 20) (1958), 522527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.McQuillan, D. L., Classification of normal congruence subgroups of the modular group, Amer. J. Math. 87 (1965), 285296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Newman, M., Free subgroups and normal subgroups of the modular group, Illinois J. Math. 8 (1964), 262265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Newman, M., On a problem of G. Sansone, Ann. Mat. pura appl. 65 (1964), 2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Newman, M. and Smart, J. R., Modulary groups of t × t matrices, Duke Math. J. 30 (1963), 253257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Pick, G., Über gewisse ganzzahlige lineare Substitutionen, welche sich nicht durch algebraische Congruenzen erklären lassen, Math. Ann. 28 (1887), 119124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Rankin, R. A., Lattice subgroups of free congruence groups, Inventiones Math. 2 (1967), 215221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Reiner, I., Normal subgroups of the unimodular group, Illinois J. Math. 2 (1958), 142144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Wohlfahrt, K., An extension of F. Klein's level concept, Illinois J. Math. 8 (1964), 529535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar