Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:18:38.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON BADLY APPROXIMABLE COMPLEX NUMBERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2010

R. ESDAHL-SCHOU  and
S. KRISTENSEN
R. ESDAHL-SCHOU
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Building 1530, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark e-mail: estel@imf.au.dk
S. KRISTENSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Building 1530, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark e-mail: sik@imf.au.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that the set of complex numbers which are badly approximable by ratios of elements of the ring of integers in , where D ∈ {1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 19, 43, 67, 163} has maximal Hausdorff dimension. In addition, the intersection of these sets is shown to have maximal dimension. The results remain true when the sets in question are intersected with a suitably regular fractal set.

Keywords

11J83
Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 349 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2010

References

REFERENCES

1.Baker, A., Linear forms in the logarithms of algebraic numbers. I, II, III, Mathematika 13 (1966), 204–216; 14 (1967), 102–107; 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Beresnevich, V., Dickinson, D. and Velani, S., Measure theoretic laws for lim sup sets, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 179 (846) (2006), x+91.Google Scholar
3.Bishop, C. J. and Jones, P. W., Hausdorff dimension and Kleinian groups, Acta Math. 179 (1) (1997), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dodson, M. M. and Kristensen, S., Hausdorff dimension and Diophantine approximation, Fractal geometry and applications: A jubilee of Benoît Mandelbrot. Part 1, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 72 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004) pp. 305–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Fishman, L., Schmidt's game, badly approximable matrices and fractals, J. Number Theory 129 (9) (2009), 2133–2153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Fernández, J. L. and Melián, M. V., Bounded geodesics of Riemann surfaces and hyperbolic manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347 (9) (1995), 3533–3549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hutchinson, J. E., Fractals and self-similarity, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (5) (1981), 713–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kristensen, S., Thorn, R. and Velani, S., Diophantine approximation and badly approximable sets, Adv. Math. 203 (1) (2006), 132–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Schmidt, W. M., On badly approximable numbers and certain games, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 123 (1966), 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Schmidt, A. L., Diophantine approximation of complex numbers, Acta Math. 134 (1975), 1–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Stark, H. M., A complete determination of the complex quadratic fields of class-number one, Michigan Math. J. 14 (1967), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar