Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:31:59.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strong limits of normal operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

John B. Conway
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, U.S.A.
Donald W. Hadwin
Affiliation:
University of New Hampshire Durham, New Hampshire 03824, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In [1, Theorem 3.3], E. Bishop proved that an operator S on a Hilbert space ℋ is subnormal if and only if there is a net of normal operators {Nα} that converges to S strongly (that is, ‖(Nα–S) f‖→ 0 for every f in ℋ). The proof that such a net exists if S is subnormal is not so difficult; in fact, a sequence of normal operators converging strongly to S can be found. Bishop's proof of the converse, however, is rather complicated and involves, among other things, some complicated arguments using operator-valued measures. The purpose of this note is to provide an easier proof of this part of the theorem. Our interest in finding such a proof was aroused by Paul Halmos.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1983

References

REFERENCES

1.Bishop, E., Spectral theory for operators on a Banach space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 86 (1957), 414445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bram, J., Subnormal operators, Duke Math. J. 22 (1955), 7594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hadwin, D., Completely positive maps and approximate equivalence, preprint.Google Scholar
4.Halmos, P. R., Normal dilations and extensions of operators, Summa Brasil. 2 (1950), 125134.Google Scholar
5.Halmos, P. R., A Hilbert space problem book (Van Nostrand, 1967).Google Scholar