Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T18:38:22.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The translational hull of a completely 0-simple semigroup

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

Mario Petrich
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park, Pennsylvania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The translational hull Ω(S) of a semigroup S plays an important role in the theory of ideal extensions of semigroups. In fact, every ideal extension of S by a semigroup T with zero can be constructed using a certain partial homomorphism of T\0 into Ω(S); a particular case of interest is when S is weakly reductive (see §4.4 of [3], [2], [7]). A theorem of Gluskin [6, 1.7.1] states that if S is a weakly reductive semigroup and a densely embedded ideal of a semigroup Q, then Q and Ω(S) are isomorphic. A number of papers of Soviet mathematicians deal with the abstract characteristic (abstract semigroup, satisfying certain conditions, isomorphic to the given semigroup) of various classes of (partial) transformation semigroups in terms of densely embedded ideals (see, e.g., [4]). In many of the cases studied, the densely embedded ideal in question is a completely 0-simple semigroup, so that Gluskin's theorem mentioned above applies. This enhances the importance of the translational hull of a weakly reductive, and in particular of a completely 0-simple semigroup. Gluskin [5] applied the theory of densely embedded ideals (which are completely 0-simple semigroups) also to semigroups and rings of endomorphisms of a linear manifold and to certain classes of abstract rings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1968

References

REFERENCES

1.Clifford, A. H., Semigroups admitting relative inverses, Annals of Math. 42 (1941), 10371049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Clifford, A. H., Extensions of semigroups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1950), 165173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Clifford, A. H. and Preston, G. B., The algebraic theory of semigroups, Vol. I, Math. Surveys No. 7, Amer. Math. Soc. (Providence, R. I., 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Gluskin, L. M., Ideals of transformation semigroups, Mat. Sb. 47 (1959), 111130 (Russian).Google Scholar
5.Gluskin, L. M., Semigroups and rings of endomorphisms of linear spaces, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, ser. mat. 23 (1959), 841870 (Russian).Google Scholar
6.Gluskin, L. M., Ideals of semigroups, Mat. Sb. 55, (1961) 421448 (Russian).Google Scholar
7.Yoshida, Reikichi, Ideal extensions of semigroups and compound semigroups, Mem. Res. Inst. Sci. Eng., Ritumeikan Univ. 13 (1965), 18.Google Scholar