Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:05:16.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative, global and transnational constitutionalism: The emergence of a transnational legal-pluralist order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

PEER ZUMBANSEN
PEER ZUMBANSEN*
Affiliation:
Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto, Canada
*
*Email: PZumbansen@osgoode.yorku.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparative lawyers have for more than a century sought to increase the understanding of ‘foreign’ legal orders and regulatory systems. Despite some never fully resolved methodological questions, great advances have been made in the comparative study of different regulatory areas both in ‘private’ (contract, tort, corporate, labour) and ‘public’ law (administrative law, environmental law). Comparative constitutional law [CCL] has emerged as a field with particular significance. Born in the context of a politically extremely divided world after the Second World War, CCL has undergone tremendous change in an economically fast-integrating world since the late 1980s. The distinction between ‘liberal’ and ‘socialist’ constitutional orders that characterized early monographical treatments of the subjects has since given way to a very incoherent landscape of varieties of constitutionalism, with enormous consequences for the task of comparative constitutional law. Rather than being able to set side-by-side distinct doctrinal instruments or legal principles that can be associated with a particular constitutional system, the emerging transnational legal-pluralist order demands a methodologically radically opened and methodologically interdisciplinary approach to capture the dynamics of constitutionalization, which characterize today’s processes of public-private norm creation and diffusion.

Keywords

comparative lawcomparative constitutionalismlegal pluralismglobal governancetransnational law
Type
Research Article
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 16 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Frankenberg, Günter, ‘Critical Comparisons: Re-Thinking Comparative Law’ (1985) 26 Harv J Int’l L 411–55Google Scholar.

2 Zweigert, Konrad and Kötz, Hein, An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rdedn, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998Google Scholar).

3 Berman, Harold J, ‘World Law’ (1995) 18 Fordham International Law Journal 1617–22.Google Scholar

4 Kahn-Freund, Otto, ‘On Use and Misuse of Comparative Law’ (1974) 37 Modern Law Review 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hill, Jonathan, ‘Comparative Law, Law Reform and Legal Theory’ (1989) 9 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 101–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Frankenberg, note 1.

5 But, see the sobering notes by Michaels, Ralf, ‘Im Westen nichts Neues?’ (2003) 66 RabelsZ 97–115Google Scholar.

6 See the contributions to the 10th Anniversary German Law Journal Symposium on ‘The Transnationalization of Legal Cultures’, June–July 2009, 1291–1416, available at <http://www.germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/FullIssues/PDF_Vol_10_No_10_Complete%20Issue.pdf>.

7 Valcke, Catherine, ‘Global Law Teaching’, (2004) 54 J Legal Educ 160Google Scholar; Reimann, Mathias, ‘From the Law of Nations to Transnational Law: Why We Need a New Basic Course for the International Curriculum’, (2004) 22 Penn State International Law Review 397–415Google Scholar.

8 Stuckey, Roy T, ‘Preparing Students to Practice Law: A Global Problem in Need of Global Solutions’ (2002) 43 South Texas Law Review 649Google Scholar.

9 Michaels, Ralf, ‘The Functional Method in Comparative Law’ in Reimann, M and Zimmermann, R (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (OUP, Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar; Zumbansen, Peer, ‘Comparative Law’s Coming of Age? Twenty Years after “Critical Comparisons”’ (2005) 6 German Law Journal 1073–84Google Scholar.

10 See e.g. ‘Washington and Lee School of Law Announces Dramatic Third Year Reform’, 10 March 2008, available at <http://law.wlu.edu/news/storydetail.asp?id=376>.

11 Carl Kester, W, ‘Governance, Contracting, and Investment Horizons: A Look at Japan and Germany’, in Chew, Donald (ed) Studies in International Corporate Finance and Governance Systems. A Comparison of the U.S., Japan and Europe (OUP, Oxford, 1997).Google Scholar

12 Scott, Craig M, ‘Introduction to “Torture as Tort”: From Sudan to Canada to Somalia’, in Scott, Craig M (ed) Torture as Tort (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001).Google Scholar

13 Brunnée, Jutta, ‘Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection’, (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 351–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Hopt, Klaus Jürgen, ‘Comparative Company Law’, in Reimann, M and Zimmermann, R (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (OUP, Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar; Zumbansen, Peer, ‘Neither “Public” nor “Private”, “National” nor “International”: Transnational Corporate Governance from a Legal Pluralist Perspective’, (2011) 38 Journal of Law and Society 50–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Wiener, Antje, ‘Contested Meanings of Norms: A Research Framework’ (2007) 5 Comparative European Politics 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 2: ‘…under conditions of transnationalization the regulatory practices of modern constitutionalism are increasingly moved out of the social contexts of their modern i.e. Hegelian conception. Subsequently, interpretation of the principles and norms of governance depends increasingly on cultural practices.’

16 For the examples of transnational contract and corporate law, see Calliess, Gralf-Peter and Zumbansen, Peer, Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2010Google Scholar) ch. 3, ch. 4.

17 Antje Wiener ‘Global Constitutionalism: Mapping an Emerging Field’ (2011), Paper prepared for the Conference Constitutionalism in a New Key? Cosmopolitan, Pluralist and Public Reason-Oriented, Berlin, Wissenschaftszentrum and Humboldt University, 28–29 January 2011, available at <http://cosmopolis.wzb.eu/content/program/conkey_Wiener_Mapping-Field.pdf> at 2.

18 Fassbender, Bardo, ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community’ (1998) 36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 529–619Google Scholar; Walter, Christian, ‘Constitutionalizing (Inter)national Governance – Possibilities and Limits to the Development of an International Constitutional Law’ (2001) 44 German Yearbook of International Law 170–201Google Scholar.

19 Peters, Anne, ‘The Merits of Global Constitutionalism’ (2009) 16 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 397–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P, ‘A Functional Approach to Global Constitutionalism’, in Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P (eds) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance (CUP, Cambridge, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also, for a differentiated position, which seeks to mediate between the structures and potentialities of national and international constitutionalism: Kumm, Mattias, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis’ (2004) 15 Eur J Int’l L 907–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Tsagourias, Nicholas (ed) Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Models (CUP, Cambridge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 Held, David, ‘Cosmopolitanism’ in Zalta, EN (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (rev. 28 November 2006) available at <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism>>Google Scholar; Archibugi, Daniele, ‘Cosmopolitan Democracy and Its Critics: A Review’ (2004) 10 European Journal of International Relations 437–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 See Tully, James, ‘The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 204–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cohen, Jean L, ‘A Global State of Emergency or the Further Constitutionalization of International Law: A Pluralist Approach’ (2008) 15 Constellations 456–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism. The Pluralist Structure of Post-national Law (Oxford, Oxford University, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 68 Law & Contemporary Problems 15–61Google Scholar; for alternative and challenging views, see e.g. Harlow, Carol, ‘Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values’, (2006) 17 Eur J Int’l L 187–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Chimni, BS ‘Co-option and Resistance: Two Faces of Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 37 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 799–827Google Scholar, and Marks, Susan ‘Naming Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 37 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 995–1001Google Scholar. For an alternative project addressing the ‘public’ nature of global governance through legal institutions, see von Bogdandy, Armin, Dann, Philipp and Goldmann, Matthias ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law’ (2008) 9 German Law Journal 1375–1400Google Scholar, and the ensuing contributions to the symposium, id.

24 Kingsbury, Benedict ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law’ (2009) 20 Eur J Int’l L 23–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Zürn, Michael ‘Globalization and global governance: from societal to political denationalization’ (2003) 11 European Review 341–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Held, David: ‘Reframing Global Governance: Apocalypse Soon or Reform!’ in Held, David and McGrew, Anthony (eds) Globalization Theory. Approaches and Controversies (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2007)Google Scholar; Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias ‘Global Governance’ in Michie, Jonathan (ed) The Handbook of Globalisation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2003)Google Scholar; Kennedy, David ‘Challenging Expert Rule: The Politics of Global Governance’ (2005) 27 Sydney Law Review 1–24Google Scholar.

27 Schwöbel, Christine EJ ‘Organic Global Constitutionalism’ (2010) 23 Leiden Journal of International Law 529–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Cappelletti, Mauro and Cohen, William, Comparative Constitutional Law (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1979)Google Scholar; Basu, Durga Das, Comparative Constitutional Law (Prentice Hall of India, 1984)Google Scholar; Jackson, Vicki C and Tushnet, Mark, Comparative Constitutional Law (2ndedn, Foundation Press, New York, 2006)Google Scholar; Dorsen, Norman, Rosenfeld, Michel, Sajó, András and Baer, Susanne, Comparative Constitutionalism. Cases and Materials (2ndedn, West Publishing, St. Paul, 2010) 36ff.Google Scholar

29 Choudhry, Sujit (ed), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (CUP, Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar

30 Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Judicial Globalization’ (2000) 40 Virginia Journal of International Law 1103–24Google Scholar.

31 La Forest, Gérard V., ‘The Expanding Role of the Supreme Court of Canada in International Law Issues’ (1996) 34 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 89Google Scholar; Arbour, Louise and Lafontaine, Fannie ‘Beyond Self-Congratulation: The Charter at 25 in an International Perspective’ (2007) 45 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 239–75Google Scholar.

32 But see: Choudhry, Sujit, ‘Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation’, (1999) Indiana Law Journal 819–92Google Scholar, 941: ‘A court’s choice of interpretive methodology will affect more than the outcome the particular case before it. It will also likely affect the broader constitutional culture of the interpreting court’s jurisdiction.’

33 Otto Kahn-Freund, Comparative Law as an Academic Subject. Inaugural lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on 12 May 1965 (1965); Kahn-Freund, Otto, ‘On Use and Misuse of Comparative Law’, (1974) 37 Modern Law Review 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Legrand, Pierre, Le droit comparé (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1999)Google Scholar; Miller, Russell, ‘Introduction’ in Bazyler, Michael, Miller, Russell, Yu, Peter and An-Na’im, Abdullahi (eds) Global Legal Traditions: Comparative Law in the Twenty-First Century (LexisNexis, forthcoming 2012)Google Scholar.

34 Williams, Susan H ‘Introduction: Comparative Constitutional Law, Gender Equality, and Constitutional Design’ in Williams, Susan H (ed), Constituting Equality. Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Law (CUP, New York, 2009) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Ibid.

36 Marks, Susan, The Riddle of All Constitutions. International Law, Democracy, and the Critique of Ideology (OUP, Oxford, 2000) 103, 146.Google Scholar

37 It is in this respect that this approach differs from the one taken by Nicholas Tsagourias (see note 20).

38 Cranston, Ross, ‘Theorizing Transnational Commercial Law’ (2007) 42 Texas International Law Journal 597–617Google Scholar.

39 Ford, Richard, ‘Law’s Territory (A History of Jurisdiction)’ (1999) 97 Michigan Law Review 843CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Blank, Yishai, ‘Localism in the Global Legal Order’ (2006) 47 Harvard International Law Journal 263–81Google Scholar.

40 Walker, Neil, ‘Taking Constitutionalism Beyond the State’ (2008) 56 Political Studies 519–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 523.

41 Jessup, Philip C, Transnational Law (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1956)Google Scholar; Wolfgang G Friedmann, ‘Corporate Power, Government by Private Groups, and the Law’ (1957) 57 Columbia Law Review 155–86.

42 Goldman, Berthold, ‘Arbitrage International et droit commun des nations’ (1956) Revue de l’Arbitrage 115Google Scholar; Schmitthoff, Clive M, ‘International Business Law: A New Law Merchant’ (1961) 2 Current Law and Social Problems 129–53Google Scholar; Gralf-Peter Calliess and Peer Zumbansen (see n 16).

43 Teubner, Gunther, ‘“Global Bukowina”: Legal Pluralism in the World Society’, in Teubner, Gunther (ed) Global Law Without A State (Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1997)Google Scholar; Merry, Sally Engle, ‘New Legal Realism and the Ethnography of Transnational Law’ (2006) 31 Law & Social Inquiry 975–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Berman, Paul Schiff, ‘The New Legal Pluralism’ (2009) Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 225–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Scott, Craig M ‘Introduction to “Torture as Tort”: From Sudan to Canada to Somalia’ in Scott, Craig M (ed) Torture as Tort (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001)Google Scholar; Hongju Koh, Harold, ‘Transnational Legal Process’ (1996) 75 Nebraska Law Review 181–206Google Scholar.

45 Scott, Craig M, ‘“Transnational Law” as Proto-Concept: Three Conceptions’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 859–76Google Scholar; Zumbansen, Peer ‘Transnational Law’ in Smits, Jan (ed) Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2006)Google Scholar.

46 Merry, Sally Engle, ‘Legal Pluralism’ (1988) 22 Law & Society Review 869–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Galanter, Marc, ‘Farther Along’ (1999) 33 Law & Society Review 1113–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Luhmann, Niklas, Political Theory in the Welfare State [1981, trans. John Bednarz Jr.] (de Gruyter, Berlin and NewYork, 1990).Google Scholar

48 Max Weber On Law in Economy and Society (translated from Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 2nd edn 1925, by E Shils and M Rheinstein, edited/annotated by M Rheinstein, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1967).

49 Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’ (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 999–1046Google Scholar; see already Bozeman, Adda B, The Future of Law in a Multicultural World (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1971)Google Scholar ix, ‘…biased in favor of the assumption that differences between cultures and political systems are functions primarily of different modes of perceiving and evaluating reality.’

50 An excellent overview is given by Berman, Paul Schiff, ‘From International Law to Law and Globalization’ (2005) 43 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 485–556Google Scholar.

51 Eugen Ehrlich, Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law (orig. published in German as Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts, 1913, Russell & Russell, New York, 1962); Moore, Sally Falk, ‘Law and Social Change: the semi-autonomous field as an appropriate subject of study’ (1973) 7 Law & Society Review 719–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Arthurs, Harry W, Without the Law: Administrative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Nineteenth Century England (Toronto University Press, Toronto, 1988).Google Scholar

52 Luhmann, Niklas, A Sociological Theory of Law (London, Routledge, 1985).Google Scholar

53 Hoffmann, Florian F ‘In Quite a State: Trials and Tribulations of an Old Concept in New Times’, in Miller, Russell and Bratspies, Rebecca (eds) Progress in International Law (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008)Google Scholar.

54 Luhmann, Niklas, ‘The World Society as a Social System’, (1982) 8 International Journal of General Systems 131–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Meyer, John W, Boli, John, Thomas, George M and Ramirez, Francisco O, ‘World Society and the Nation-State’ (1997) 103 American Journal of Sociology 144–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Jackson, Vicki C, ‘Methodological Challenges in Comparative Constitutional Law’ (2010) 28 Penn State International Law Review 319–26, 324Google Scholar.

56 Rosenfeld, Michel, ‘Rethinking constitutional ordering in an era of legal and ideological pluralism’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 415–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57 For a discussion of the ‘four ‘i’s’ (inappropriate, inconceivable, improbable or illegitimate), see Neil Walker (see n 40) 519–43, 520–5.

58 Poignantly depicted by Hill, Jonathan, ‘Comparative Law, Law Reform and Legal Theory’ (1989) 9 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 101–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Ralf Michaels (see n 9).

60 de Tocqueville, Alexandre, Democracy in America (Reeve, H trans.) [1835] (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61 Beatty, David M, The Ultimate Rule of Law (OUP, Oxford, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 Mauro Cappelletti and William Cohen, note 28; Durga Das Basu, note 28; Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kötz, note 2.

63 Reinhart Koselleck, ‘Modernity and the Planes of Historicity (orig. in German, 1979, Vergangene Zukunft der frühen Neuzeit)’, (1981) 10 Economy and Society 166–83, cited after Koselleck, Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time (Keith Tribe trans., Columbia University, New York, 2004) 9, 22.

64 Cited in JGA Pocock, ‘Burke and the Ancient Constitution: A Problem in the History of Ideas’ in JGA Pocock, Politics, Language & Time. Essays on Political Thought and History (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1989) 202–32, 205.

65 Cited in Pocock, n 64, 211.

66 Pocock, n 64, 204–5.

67 Koselleck, n 63, 23.

68 Koselleck, n 63, 22.

69 Pocock, n 64, 212.

70 Grimm, Dieter, ‘Der Wandel der Staatsaufgaben und die Zukunft der Verfassung’, in Grimm, Dieter (ed) Staatsaufgaben (Frankfurt, 1996)Google Scholar.

71 Neil Walker (see n 40) 521: ‘The invocation of the ideas and practices of constitutionalism involves a distinctive way of thinking about the world – an epistemic horizon and political imaginary that presupposes and refers to the particular form of the state.’

72 Consider the ‘controversy over citation’, Dorsen et al (see n 28) 6 ff; see also the discussion of the ‘living constitution’ and the ‘constitution as living tree’ metaphors in Jackson, Vicki C, ‘Constitutions as ‘Living Trees’? Comparative Constitutional Law and Interpretive Metaphors’, (2006) 75 Fordham Law Review 921–60Google Scholar, 941 ff.

73 Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S. Ct. 2472, 2481 (2003); Teitel, Ruti, ‘Comparative Constitutional Law in a Global Age’ (2004) 117 Harvard Law Review 2570–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for a skeptical view: McCrudden, Christopher, ‘A Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, (2000) 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 499–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Kemmerer, Alexandra, ‘Constitutional Law as Work of Art – Experts’ Eyes: Judges of the World Examine the Constitution of Europe’, (2003) 4 German Law Journal 859–62Google Scholar.

75 O’Rourke, Kevin H and Williamson, Jeffrey G, Globalization and History. The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999)Google Scholar; Osterhammel, Jürgen and Petersson, Niels P, Globalization: A Short History [Geyer, Dona trans.] (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004).Google Scholar

76 See Sajó, András, Limiting Government. An Introduction to Constitutionalism (Central European University Press, Budapest, 1999)Google Scholar; Alexander Somek, ‘Constitutionalization and the Common Good’, paper for the Cardozo-NYU I-CON Colloquium, February 2010, on file with author.

77 Scott, Craig and Zumbansen, Peer ‘Foreword: Making a Case for Comparative Constitutionalism and Transnational Law’, (2006) 46 Osgoode Hall Law Journal vii–xixGoogle Scholar; Rosenfeld, Michel ‘Rethinking constitutional ordering in an era of legal and ideological pluralism’, (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 415–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brennan, Timothy, ‘Postcolonial Studies and Globalization Theory’ in Krishnaswamy, Revathi and Hawley, John C (eds) The Postcolonial and the Global (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2008)Google Scholar, 37 ff, 39, highlighting the normative bias of modern globalization writing: ‘The “now” is the new, and the new is rapturously and exuberantly embraced.’

78 Dobner, Petra, ‘More Law, Less Democracy? Democracy and Transnational Constitutionalism’, in Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin (eds) The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (OUP, Oxford, 2010), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

79 Kennedy, David, ‘New Approaches to Comparative Law: Comparativism and International Governance’, (1997) Utah Law Review 545–37Google Scholar; Whytock, Christopher A, ‘Taking Causality Seriously in Comparative Constitutional Law: Insights from Comparative Politics and Comparative Political Economy’, (2008) 41 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 629–82.Google Scholar

80 Habermas, Jürgen, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001)Google Scholar; Habermas, Jürgen, ‘A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society?’ in Habermas, Jürgen (ed) Between Naturalism and Religion. Philosophical Essays [Ciaran Cronin trans.] (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2008)Google Scholar.

81 Hall, R and Biersteker, T (eds), The Emergence of Private Authority: Forms of Private Authority and their Implications for International Governance (CUP, Cambridge, 2001).Google Scholar

82 Schneiderman, David, ‘Investment Rules and the New Constitutionalism’ (2000) 25 Law & Soc Inquiry 757–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

83 Sinclair, Timothy J, ‘Passing Judgment: Credit Rating Processes as Regulatory Mechanisms of Governance in the Emerging World Order’, (1994) 1 Review of International Political Economy 133–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kerwer, Dieter ‘Holding Global Regulators Accountable: The Case of Credit Rating Agencies’, (2005a) 18 Governance 453–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Schepel, Harm, The Constitution of Private Governance. Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar.

85 Brunsson, Nils and Jacobsson, Bengt (eds), A World of Standards (OUP, Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar

86 Claire Cutler, A, Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (CUP, Cambridge, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

87 von Bogdandy, Armin, Dann, Philipp and Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law’, (2008) 9 German Law Journal 1375–1400Google Scholar.

88 See e.g. Keohane, Robert O and Nye, Joseph S, ‘Introduction’, in Nye, Joseph S and Donahue, John D (eds), Governance in a Globalizing World (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 2000)Google Scholar; McDougal, Myres S, Lasswell, Harold D and Michael Reisman, W, ‘The World Constitutive Process of Authoritative Decision’, in McDougal, Myres S and Michael Reisman, W (eds), International Law Essays; A Supplement to International Law in Contemporary Perspective (Foundation Press, New York, 1981)Google Scholar; Hobson, John M, The State and International Relations (CUP, Cambridge, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

89 Bevir, Mark, Rhodes, RAW and Weller, Patrick, ‘Traditions of Governance: Interpreting the Changing Role of the Public Sector’ (2003) 81 Public Administration 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; JrAman, Alfred., ‘Law, Markets and Democracy: A Role for Law in the Neo-Liberal State’ (2007) 51 New York Law School Review 801–15Google Scholar; Rhodes, Rod AW ‘Waves of Governance’ in Levi-Faur, David (ed) Oxford Handbook of Governance (OUP, Oxford, forthcoming 2012).Google Scholar

90 Goldman, Berthold, ‘Frontières du droit et “lex mercatoria”’ (1964) 13 Archives de la Philosophie de Droit 177–92Google Scholar; Berger, Klaus Peter (ed), The Practice of Transnational Law (Kluwer Law, The Hague, 2001)Google Scholar; for a critique, see Schultz, Thomas, ‘Some Critical Comments on the Juridicity of Lex Mercatoria’ (2008) 10 Yearbook of Private International Law 667–710Google Scholar; Zumbansen, Peer, ‘Piercing the Legal Veil: Commercial Arbitration and Transnational Law’, (2002) 8 European Law Journal 400–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gralf-Peter Calliess and Peer Zumbansen (see n 16).

91 Gunther Teubner, (see n 43).

92 Michaels, Ralf, ‘The True New Lex Mercatoria: Law Beyond the State’ (2007) 14 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 447–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 Teubner, Gunther, ‘Fragmented Foundations: Societal Constitutionalism Beyond the Nation State’ in Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin (eds) The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (OUP, Oxford, 2010) 328.Google Scholar

94 Patrick Glenn, H, ‘Comparative Legal Families and Comparative Legal Traditions’, in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (OUP, Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar, and Professor Glenn’s ground-breaking textbook, soon to be published in its fifth edition (see n 110).

95 Hirschl, Ran, ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’ (2005) 53 American Journal of Comparative Law 125–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

96 Russell Miller, ‘Introduction’ (see n 33) who draws on Patrick Glenn’s concept of legal traditions to argue that ‘the answer must be that legal tradition need not be the object of a comparative undertaking, but instead might be part of the inquiry to be made in better understanding the laws or legal institutions that eventually become the objects of comparison.’

97 Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Globalization or World Society: How to Conceive of Modern Society?’ (1997) 7 Int’l Rev. Sociol. 67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; John W Meyer et al (see n 54).

98 Eugen Ehrlich (see n 51) 465; Sally Engle Merry (see n 43) 975–95; Gunther Teubner (see n 93) 331.

99 Sally Engle Merry (see n 43) 975–95.

100 Willke, Helmut, Smart Governance. Governing the Global Knowledge Society (Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, 2007) 53.Google Scholar

101 Anghie, Antony, ‘The evolution of international law: Colonial and postcolonial realities’ (2006) 27 Third World Quarterly 739–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chimni, BS, ‘Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto’, (2006) 8 International Community Law Review 3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 Alston, Philip, ‘The “Not-a-Cat” Syndrome: Can the International Human Rights Regime Accommodate Non-State Actors?’ in Alston, Philip (ed) Non-State Actors and Human Rights (OUP, Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar.

103 Chang, Wen-Chen, ‘An Isolated Nation with Global-Minded Citizens: Bottom-Up Transnational Constitutionalism in Taiwan’, (2009) 4 National Taiwan University Law Review 203–35Google Scholar, 222–30.

104 de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, ‘The World Social Forum and the Global Left’, (2008) 36 Politics & Society 247–70.Google Scholar

105 Otto, Diane, ‘Lost in translation: re-scripting the sexed subjects of international human rights law’, in Orford, Anne (ed) International Law and its Others (CUP, Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar

106 Somek, Alexander, ‘Die Verfassung im Zeitalter ihrer transnationalen Reproduzierbarkeit. Gedanken zum Begriff der Konstitutionalisierung’ in Franzius, C, Mayer, FC and Neyer, J (eds) Strukturfragen der Europäischen Union (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2011), 141.Google Scholar

107 Id., at 142.

108 Ulrich Beck, World at Risk [orig. German ‘Weltrisikogesellschaft’ Ciaran Cronin, trans.] (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 2009).

109 Brunkhorst, Hauke, ‘Constitutionalism and Democracy in the World Society’, in Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin (eds) The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (OUP, Oxford, 2010), 186–7.Google Scholar

110 Patrick Glenn, H., Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law (2ndedn, OUP, Oxford, 2004).Google Scholar

111 Bazyler, Michael, Miller, Russell, Yu, Peter and An-Na’im, Abdullahi (eds) Global Legal Traditions: Comparative Law in the Twenty-First Century (LexisNexis, forthcoming 2012).Google Scholar

112 Tomuschat, Christian, ‘The Effects of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights According to the German Constitutional Court’ (2010) 11 German Law Journal 513–26Google Scholar; Norman Dorsen et al (see n 28) 77 ff (‘The Transnational Constitution’).

113 Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang, ‘Two Hundred Years of Marbury v. Madison: The Struggle for Judicial Review of Constitutional Questions in the United States and Europe’ (2004) 5 German Law Journal 685–701Google Scholar.

114 Christian Tomuschat (see n 112).

115 Helmut Willke (see n 100) 39.

116 An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed, Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari’a (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2008) 84 ff (ch 3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

117 Dorsen et al (see n 28).

118 Sujit Choudhry (see n 29).

119 Excellent: Petra Dobner (see n 78) and Neil Walker (see n 40) 519–43, 525 ff.

120 Grey, Thomas C., ‘Constitutionalism: An Analytic Framework’ in Pennock, JR and Chapman, JW (eds) Constitutionalism: Nomos XX [Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy] (New York University, New York, 1979) 189Google Scholar.

121 See e.g. Niklas Luhmann (n 52).

122 Beck, Ulrich, ‘Living in the world risk society’ (2006) 35 Economy and Society 329–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

123 Amstutz, Marc, ‘The Letter of the Law: Legal Reasoning in a Societal Perspective’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 361–82Google Scholar.

124 Sally Falk Moore (see n 51); Galanter, Marc, ‘Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change’, (1974) 9 Law & Society Review 95–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

125 Engle Merry, Sally, ‘Anthropology, Law, and Transnational Processes’, (1992) 21 Annual Review of Anthropology 357–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zumbansen, Peer, ‘Transnational Legal Pluralism’ (2010) 1 Transnational Legal Theory 141–89 available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1542907>CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

126 See e.g. Ashby Wilson, Richard, ‘Tyrannosaurus Lex: The Anthropology of Human Rights and Transnational Law’ in Goodale, Mark and Engle Merry, Sally (eds) The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law Between the Global and the Local (CUP, Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar

127 See e.g. Brough Macpherson, Crawford, ‘The Rise and Fall of Economic Justice’ in The Rise and Fall of Economic Justice, and other Essays. The role of state, class and property in twentieth-century democracy (OUP, Oxford, 1985) 1–20.Google Scholar

128 Wiethölter, Rudolf, ‘Social Science Models in Economic Law’, in Daintith, Terence and Teubner, Gunther (eds) Contract and Organisation. Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory (de Gruyter, Berlin, 1986)Google Scholar; for a perspective after the ‘rights revolution’, see Sunstein, Cass, After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar; and Lobel, Orly, ‘The Paradox of Extralegal Activism: Critical Legal Consciousness and Transformative Politics’ (2007) 120 Harvard Law Review 937–88Google Scholar.

129 Ackerman, Bruce A, ‘The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution’ (1984) 93 Yale Law Journal 1013–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Habermas, Jürgen, ‘On the Internal Relation between the Rule of Law and Democracy’ (1995) 3 European Journal of Philosophy 12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Constitutionalism and Democracy’ (1995) 3 European Journal of Philosophy 2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar; András Sajó (see n 76) xiv.

130 Compare with Jeremy Waldron, ‘Constitutionalism: A Skeptical View’ (2010) New York University Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper No. 10–87 at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722771>, 13: ‘Unlike, say, the Rule of Law, constitutionalism is not just a normative theory about the forms and procedures of governance. It is about controlling, limiting, and restraining the power of the state.’

131 Id. at 17–18.

132 Yeh, Jiunn-Rong, ‘The Emergence of Asian Constitutionalism: Features in Comparison’ (2009) 4 National Taiwan University Law Review 39–53Google Scholar, 41. Professor Yeh has argued that this type of constitutionalism has been succeeded by ‘transitional constitutionalism’, marked by a high degree of dynamic change, future empowerment and contingent constitutional arrangements, which are likely to be changed and adapted later. The last stage in this development he depicts as ‘transnational constitutionalism’, marked by the emergence of supra-national constitutional frameworks (for example the EU), the tension between ‘domestic’ and ‘transnational’ constitutional norms, and the increasing institutional borrowing and judicial dialogue. Id. at 44.

133 Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kötz (see n 2), 43 ff.

134 For a critique, see only Baxi, Upendra, The Future of Human Rights (OUP, Oxford, 2002)Google Scholar.

135 Teubner, Gunther, ‘The King’s Many Bodies: The Self-Deconstruction of Law’s Hierarchy’ (1997) 31 Law & Society Review 763–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

136 Ackerman, Bruce A, ‘The Rise of World Constitutionalism’ (1997) 83 Virginia Law Review 771CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also the contributions to Macdonald, Ronald St. John and Johnston, Douglas M (eds), Towards World Constitutionalism. Issues in the Legal Ordering of the World Community (Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, 2005).Google Scholar

137 Immanuel Kant, To Perpetual Peace. A Philosophical Sketch (Ted Humphrey trans., orig. 1795, 2003); David Held (see n 21); Archibugi, Daniele, The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

138 Brun-Otto Bryde, ‘International Democratic Constitutionalism’, in Macdonald and Johnston (n 36); Regina Kreide, ‘The Ambivalence of Juridification. On Legitimate Governance in the International Context’, (2009) 2 Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 18.

139 Benedict Kingsbury et al (see n 23).

140 Nico Krisch, ‘Global Administrative Law and the Constitutional Ambition’ (2009) LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 10/2009 available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344788>.

141 Benedict Kingsbury (see n 24).

142 Griffiths, John, ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’ (1986) 24 Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marc Galanter (see n 46).

143 Berman, Paul Schiff, ‘Global Legal Pluralism’, (2007) 80 Southern California Law Review 1155–1237Google Scholar; Paul Schiff Berman (see n 43); Ralf Michaels, ‘Global Legal Pluralism’ (2009) Duke Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper No. 259 available at <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1430395>; Peer Zumbansen (see n 125).

144 Sassen, Saskia, ‘The Places and Spaces of the Global: An Expanded Analytic Terrain’, in Held, David and McGrew, Anthony (eds) Globalization Theory. Approaches and Controversies (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2007)Google Scholar; Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas, ‘Spatial Justice: Law and the Geography of Withdrawal’ (2010) 6 International Journal of Law in Context 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

145 Colin Scott, ‘Regulatory Governance and the Challenge of Constitutionalism’ (2010) EUI Working Papers. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Private Regulation Series 02 available at <http://ucd-ie.academia.edu/documents/0093/9406/RSCAS_2010_07.pdf>.

146 Amstutz, Marc and Karavas, Vaios, ‘Weltrecht: Ein Derridasches Monster’, in Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Liber Amicorum für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin, 2009).Google Scholar

147 Twining, William, ‘Diffusion and Globalization Discourse’ (2006) 47 Harvard International Law Journal 507Google Scholar; Blank, Yishai, ‘Federalism, Subsidiarity, and the Role of Local Governments in an Age of Multilevel Governance’ (2010) 37 Fordham Urban Law Journal 509Google Scholar.

148 Rose-Ackerman, Susan, ‘Risk Taking and Reelection: Does Federalism Promote Innovation?’ (1980) 9 Journal of Legal Studies 593CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

149 Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Howse, Robert (eds), The Federal Vision. Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (OUP, Oxford, 2001).Google Scholar

150 Markovits, Inga, ‘Selective Memory: How the Law Affects What We Remember and Forget from the Past: The Case of East Germany’ (2001) 35 Law & Society Review 513–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

151 Teitel, Ruti, Transitional Justice (OUP, Oxford, 2000)Google Scholar.

152 Michel Rosenfeld, The Identity of the Constitutional Subject (2010), reproduced in part in Norman Dorsen et al (see n 28) 66–74 at 73.

153 Yerushalmi, Yosef Hayim, Zakhor: Jewish History and Jewish Memory (University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1982).Google Scholar

154 See the contributions by Anker, Llewellyn, Nagi and Joerges in Zumbansen, Peer and Buchanan, Ruth (eds) Rights, Development and Transitional Justice (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2012 forthcoming).Google Scholar

155 See e.g. Jürgen Osterhammel and Niels P Petersson (see n 75); Gilroy, Paul, Postcolonial Melancholia (Columbia University Press, New York, 2006).Google Scholar

156 Albert HY Chen, ‘Western Constitutionalism in Southeast Asia: Some Historical and Comparative Observations’ (2010) available at <http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1723658>.

157 Sujit Choudhry (see n 32).

158 Telling: Williamson, Oliver E, The Mechanisms of Governance (OUP, Oxford, 1996)Google Scholar, ch. 6; see also Posner, Richard A, ‘Creating a Legal Framework for Economic Development’ (1998) 13 The World Bank Research Observer 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

159 For an insightful account, see Williamson, Oliver E, ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’ (2000) 38 Journal of Economic Literature 595–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Ostrom, Elinor, ‘Challenges and growth: the development of the interdisciplinary field of institutional analysis’ (2007) 3 Journal of Institutional Economics 239–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 242–3.

160 Williamson, Oliver E, ‘The Economics of Governance’ (2005) 95 American Economic Review 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for a discussion see Calliess and Zumbansen, (see n 16) ch. 2, part III, C i. (113–19)

161 Dixit, Avinash K, Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

162 Oliver E Williamson (see n 158); Oliver E Williamson (see n 160).

163 See e.g. Hadfield, Gillian K and Talley, Eric, ‘On Public versus Private Provision of Corporate Law’, (2006) 22 Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 414CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hadfield, Gillian, ‘The Public and the Private in the Provision of Law for Global Services’ in Gessner, Volkmar (ed), Contractual Certainty in International Trade. Empirical Studies and Theoretical Debates on Institutional Support for Global Economic Exchanges (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2009)Google Scholar.

164 Ehrlich (see n 51); Moore, Sally Falk, Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach (London, Kegan Paul, 1978)Google Scholar; Harry W Arthurs (see n 51); Griffiths, John, ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’ (1986) 24 Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Merry (see n 46).

165 Hale, Robert L, ‘Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State’ (1923) 38 Political Science Quarterly 470CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cohen, Morris R, ‘Property and Sovereignty’, (1927) 13 Cornell Law Quarterly 8Google Scholar.

166 Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations (orig. 1776, Prometheus Books, New York, 1991); Marx, Karl, The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 [Milligan, Martin trans.] (Prometheus Books, New York, 1988)Google Scholar.

167 Alexander Somek (see n 106) 145.

168 Id.

169 Gunther Teubner, ‘Justice under Global Capitalism?’ (European University Institute, 2008) 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 1–8 available at <http://cadmus.eui.eu/dspace/bitstream/1814/10217/1/EJLS_2008_1_3_TEU_En.pdf> 6.

170 Schneiderman, David, ‘Transnational Legality and the Immobilization of Local Agency’ (2006) 2 Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 387–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cutler (see n 86); see already Vagts, Detlev F, ‘The Multinational Enterprise: A New Challenge for Transnational Law’ (1969) 83 Harvard Law Review 739–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

171 Compare with Jiunn-Rong Yeh (see n 132) 39–53, 47–9, stressing the ‘thin understanding of liberal constitutionalism’, whereby constitutional change in Asia in recent decades has – different to the transitional context in Eastern Europe – not been focused on market transformation, but on the simultaneous, non-oppositional development of liberal and social rights.

172 On point: Loughlin, Martin, ‘What is Constitutionalization?’ in Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin (eds) The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (2010)Google Scholar.

173 Petra Dobner (see n 78); Somek, Alexander, ‘The argument from transnational effects II: Establishing transnational democracy’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 375–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar, depicting the unresolved nature of legitimacy in ‘Global Administrative Law’ as evidence for an assumed, but not scrutinized natural law basis of the project.

174 Jeremy Waldron (see n 132) 40: ‘Constitutions are not just about retraining and limiting power; they are about the empowerment of ordinary people in a democracy and allowing them to control the sources of law and harness the apparatus of government to their legitimate expectations. That is the democratic view of constitutions, but it is not the constitutionalist view.”

175 Schmitt, Carl, Constitutional Theory (Seitzer, Jeffrey trans. [orig. German 1928]) (Duke University Press, Durham, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

176 Sassen, Saskia, ‘The State and Globalization’ in Nye, Joseph S and Donahue, John D (eds), Governance in a Globalizing World (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 2000).Google Scholar

177 Nonet, Philippe and Selznick, Philip, Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law (Harper Torch, 1978)Google Scholar; Teubner, Gunther, ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’ (1983) 17 Law & Society Review 239–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Teubner, Gunther, ‘Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg’ (1984) 18 Law & Society Review 291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

178 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, ‘Risiko Sozialstaat. Expansion des Sozialstaats ohne verfassungsrechtliche Schranken’ (2007) 46 Der Staat 61–88Google Scholar; Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, ‘Staat und Gesellschaft. Von der liberalen zur postmodernen Gesellschaft’ in Depenheuer, Otto and Grabenwerter, Christoph (eds), Verfassungstheorie (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2010)Google Scholar; Young, Ernest A, ‘The Constitution outside the Constitution’, (2007) 117 Yale Law Journal 408–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and see already Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft’, (1990) 9 Rechtshistorisches Journal 176–220.Google Scholar

179 Schneiderman, David, ‘Realising Rights in an Era of Economic Globalisation: Discourse Theory, Investor Rights, and Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment’, in Shaw, Wenhua, Simons, Penelope and Singh, Dalvinder (eds) Redefining Sovereignty in International Economic Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2008).Google Scholar

180 Rittich, Kerry, ‘Functionalism and Formalism: Their latest Incarnations in Contemporary Development and Governance Debates’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 853–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

181 Grimm, Dieter, ‘Integration by Constitution’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walker, Neil, ‘Taking Constitutionalism Beyond the State’ (2008) 56 Political Studies 519–43, 531CrossRefGoogle Scholar

182 Gunther Teubner (see n 93) 341: ‘… one can only be amazed at the naivety of participatory romanticism.’

183 Hutchinson, Allan C and Monahan, Patrick (eds), The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology (Carswell, Toronto, 1987)Google Scholar

184 Stolleis, Michael, ‘Die Entstehung des Interventionsstaates und das öffentliche Recht’, (1989) 11 ZNR 129–147Google Scholar.

185 Ewald, François, L’Etat providence (Bernard Grasset, Paris, 1986).Google Scholar

186 Scott, Colin, ‘Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the Post-Regulatory State’ in Jordana, Jacint and Levi-Faur, David (eds) The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2004).Google Scholar

187 Fraser, Nancy, Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2008)Google Scholar; Chatterjee, Partha, The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World (Columbia University Press, New York, 2004) 59Google Scholar ff; Stichweh, Rudolf, Inklusion und Exklusion. Studien zur Gesellschaftstheorie (transcript-Verlag, Bielefeld, 2005)Google Scholar 45 ff; Luhmann, Niklas, Law as a Social System (Ziegert trans, K., Kastner, F, Schiff, D, Nobles, R and Ziegert, R eds) (OUP, Oxford, 2004), ch. 12.Google Scholar; Neil Walker (see n 40) 519–43, 540: ‘a powerful continuing counterpoint’.

188 Cover, Robert M, ‘Nomos and Narrative’, (1983) 97 Harvard Law Review 4–68Google Scholar; Philippe Nonet and Philip Selznick (see n 177); Rodgers, Daniel T, Atlantic Crossings. Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar.

189 Nico Krisch (see n 140); for a critique, see Alexander Somek, (see n 173) and Somek ‘Administration without Sovereignty’ in Petra Dobner and Martin Loughlin (eds) The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (OUP, Oxford, 2010) 267 ff.

190 For a rescue attempt, see Kingsbury n 24.

191 Niklas Luhmann (see n 178); Niklas Luhmann (see n 47).

192 Jeremy Waldron (see n 132).

193 Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kötz (see n 2), 34 ff.

194 See e.g. Donald, David C, ‘Approaching Comparative Company Law’ (2008) 14 Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law 83–178Google Scholar.

195 Patrick Glenn, H (see n 110); Annelise Riles, ‘Comparative Law and Socio-Legal Studies’ in Reimann, M and Zimmermann, R (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (OUP, Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar; Peer Zumbansen (see n 9).

196 Latour, Bruno, We have never been modern (Porter, Catherine trans.) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar

197 Baxi, Upendra, ‘The Colonialist Heritage’, in Roderick Munday, Pierre Legrand and (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (CUP, Cambridge, 2003) 4675CrossRefGoogle Scholar