Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:44:12.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The liberty of the moderns: Market freedom and democracy within the EU

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

RICHARD BELLAMY
RICHARD BELLAMY*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, School of Public Policy, University College London, 29/30 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9QU
*
*Email: r.bellamy@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Taking its cue from Benjamin Constant’s famous comparison of the liberty of the ancients with that of the moderns, this article examines the compatibility of democracy with free markets within the EU. Constant argued that commerce had replaced the political liberty of the ancients with the civil liberties of the moderns. Nevertheless, he contended a degree of political liberty remained necessary to guarantee these civil liberties. The difficulty was whether the political system could operate in the interest of all if modern citizens had ceased to identify with the public interest in the manner of the ancients and preferred to pursue their private interests. Constant believed representative democracy offered a form of political liberty that was compatible with modern liberty. It involved a less demanding view of civic virtue to ancient liberty and a different conception of the public interest as promoting rather than in conflict with private interests. However, for it to operate as Constant expected required certain social and cultural conditions that emerged in European nation states but are not themselves the products of commerce and may even be undermined by it: namely, a national identity; a social contract; and political parties. The EU involves a further deepening of modern commercial liberty beyond the nation state. This article explores three main issues raised by this development. First, have any of the three elements that facilitated the operation of representative democracy within the member states evolved at the EU level? Second, if not, is it possible to create an effective form of representative democracy on a post-national basis as the logical entailment of the liberties of the moderns? Third, if neither of these is possible, can we simply detach modern liberty from political liberty and see social rights as attributes of free movement, and efficient and equitable economic regulations as the products of technocratic governance? All three questions are answered in the negative.

Keywords

ConstantEU citizenshipfreedomdemocracy
Type
Research Article
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 141 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, P. 2009. The Narcissism of Minor Differences: How America and Europe are Alike. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barbalet, J. M. 1988. Citizenship: Rights, Struggle and Class Equality. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. 2010. “Democracy without Democracy? Can the EU’s Democratic ‘Outputs’ be Separated from the Democratic ‘Inputs’ Provided by Competitive Parties and Majority Rule?” Journal of European Public Policy 17(1):2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. 2008. “Evaluating Union Citizenship: Belonging, Rights and Participation within the EU.” Citizenship Studies, 12(6):597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. 2007. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S. 2008. Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. 2007. “Twilight of Sovereignty or the Emergence of Cosmopolitan Norms? Rethinking Citizenship in Volatile Times.” Citizenship Studies 11(1):19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I. 1969. Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bryce, J. 1921. Modern Democracies. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Caporoso, J. A. and Tarrow, S.. 2008. “Polanyi in Brussels: European Institutions and the Embedding of Markets in Society.” Paper presented at APSA 2008 annual meeting, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Carens, J. H. 1987. “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders.” Review of Politics 49(2):251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T. 2006. “A Democratic Theory of Territory and Some Puzzles about Global Democracy.” Journal of Social Philosophy 37(1):81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T. 1996. The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Oxford: Westeview.Google Scholar
Coen, D. and Thatcher, M.. 2005. “The New Governance of Markets and Non-Majoritarian Regulators.” Governance 18(3):329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. and Sabel, C.. 2006. “Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 34:147–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constant, B. 1988. Political Writings, edited by Fontana, B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Constant, B. 1819. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns.” In Constant 1988, 307–28.Google Scholar
Constant, B. 1815. “Principles of Politics Applicable to All Representative Governments.” In Constant 1988, 170–305.Google Scholar
Constant, B. 1813. “The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation and their Relation to European Civilization.” In Constant 1988, 43–167.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. and Tufte, E. R.. 1973. Size and Democracy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, A. 2011. Federal Union Now. London: Federal Trust.Google Scholar
Elkin, S. L. 2006. Reconstructing the Commercial Republic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, E. O. 2009. The Unfinished Democratization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everson, M. 1995. “The Legacy of the Market Citizen.” In New Legal Dynamics of European Union, edited by Shaw, J. and More, G., 73–89. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fontana, B. 2002. “The Napoleonic Empire and the Europe of Nations.” In The Idea of Europe, edited by Pagden, A., 116–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Galston, W. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues and Duties in the Liberal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2001a. “Why Europe Needs a Constitution.” New Left Review, 11(Sept–Oct): 5–26.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2001b. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1998 The Inclusion of the Other. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, C. 1992. “Who Goes to Court? An Analysis of Litigation against the European Community.” European Law Review 17(1):105–25.Google Scholar
Hay, C. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Held, D. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hix, S. 2008. What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hix, S. and Marsh, M.. 2011. “Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of European Parliament elections across time.” Electoral Studies 30(1):4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, S. 1966 “Obstinate or Obsolete: The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe.” Daedalus 95(3):862–915.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1741) “Of Parties in General.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary (rev. edn 1987), edited by Miller, E. F., 54–63. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. 2009. “Constant’s Idea of Modern Liberty.” In The Cambridge Companion to Constant, edited by Rosenblatt, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joppke, C. 2001. “The Evolution of Alien Rights in the United States, Germany and the European Union.” In Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices, edited by Aleinikoff, A. and Klusmeyer, D.. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Kochenov, D. 2011/12. “A Real European Citizenship: A New Jurisdiction Test: A Novel Chapter in the Development of the Union in Europe.” Columbia Journal of European Law 18(1):55–109.Google Scholar
Kostakopoulou, D. 2008. “The Evolution of European Union Citizenship.” European Political Science 7(3):285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kröger, S. 2008. “Nothing but Consultation: The Place of Organised Civil Society in EU Policy-making across Policies.” EUROGOV No. C-08-03 athttp://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-08-03.pdf.Google Scholar
Kukathas, C. 2003. “Immigration.” In The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics, edited by LaFollette, H., 567–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S.. 1967. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments, Introduction edited by Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S.. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mair, P. 2011. “Smaghi vs. the Parties: Representative Government and Institutional Constraints.” Paper prepared for the Conference on Democracy in Straightjackets: Politics in an Age of Permanent Austerity, Ringberg Castle, Munich, March 23–6.Google Scholar
Majone, G. 2001. “Nonmajoritarian Institutions and the Limits of Democratic Governance: a Political Transaction Cost Approach.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 157(1):57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. 1996. “Regulatory Legitimacy.” In Regulating Europe, edited by Majone, G. et al. , 284–301. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mann, M. 1987. “Ruling Strategies and Citizenship.” Sociology, 21:339–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1861. “Considerations on Representative Government.” In Utilitarianism, On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government, edited by Acton, H. B. (edn 1972), 171–393. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 2009. “Democracy’s Domain.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 37(3):201–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. 2008. “Republicanism, National Identity and Europe.” In Republicanism and Political Theory, edited by Laborde, C. and Maynor, J., 133–58. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. 2002. “In Defence of the Democratic Deficit: Reassessing Legitimacy in the EU.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4):603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newdick, C. 2006. “Citizenship, Free Movement and Healthcare: Cementing Individual Rights by Corroding Social Solidarity.” Common Market Law Review 43:1645–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1996. “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism.” In For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism, edited by Cohen, J., 3–17. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Offe, C. 2003. “Is There, or Can There Be, a ‘European Society?”’ In Demokratien in Europa, edited by Katenhusen, I. and Laming, W., 71–89. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, C. 2000. “The Democratic Welfare State in an Integrating Europe.” In Democracy Beyond the State? The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order, edited by Greven, M. and Pauly, L.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Olson, M. 1974. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (revised edn). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pattie, C., Seyd, P., and Whiteley, P. 2004. Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York, NY: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1994. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. 1974. “Dimensions of State Formation and Nation-Building.” In The Formation of National States in Western Europe, edited by Tilly, C.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Jonathan, Zeitlin. 2007. “Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union.” European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) No. C-07–02 athttp://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-07-02.pdf.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, A. 2007. “Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 35(1):2–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. 2009. “Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity.” European Political Science Review 1:173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Shore, C. 2004. “Whither European Citizenship?” European Journal of Social Theory 7(1):27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siedentop, L. 1979. “Two Liberal Traditions.” In The Idea of Freedom, edited by Ryan, A., 153–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swank, D. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, M. 2005. “The Third Force? Independent Regulatory Agencies and Elected Politicians in Europe.” Governance 18:347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, J. 1958. “Adam Smith and Laissez-Faire.” In The Long View and the Short: Studies in Economic Theory and Policy, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Warleigh, A. 2006. “Making Citizens from the Market? NGOs and the Representation of Interests.” In Making European Citizens: Civic Inclusion in a Transnational Context, edited by Bellamy, R., Castiglione, D. and Shaw, J., ch. 6. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Weale, A. 2007. Democracy, 2nd edn.Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, L. and Milanovic, B.. 2009. “Are Liberal Peoples Peaceful?” Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(4):462–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. 2003. The Civic Minimum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, D. 1978. Adam Smith’s Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, R. P. 1970. In Defense of Anarchism. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar