Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:38:28.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Open Society and Utility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Alan Ryan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I HOPE I SHALL OFFEND NEITHER PROFESSOR CRICK NOR DR KING if I do not discuss their papers in detail. With almost all they say I have no disagreement; and to what they say I think I have little to add. The first thing I wish to do is pursue a point which Crick makes early on in his paper and then drops. Crick says there that one aspect of toleration is ‘putting up with’ whatever it might be; to say that the weather, one's colleagues, or last night's party were ‘tolerable’ amounts to saying that one could put up with them. Of course, as he and King agree, to call any of these tolerable certainly implies that we did not actually like or enjoy it or them; whatever we regard with favour we do not simply tolerate. Crick thinks there is not much to be done with the notion of ‘putting up with’ something; but I shall try to show that we can get further than he thinks.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1971 , pp. 235 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Crick above, p. 145.

2 Ibid., p. 146.

3 Ibid., p. 144.I ought not, for example, to tolerate your being assaulted; there is no virtue in my tolerating the evils done to others.

4 See King above, p. 172. where a religion is described as disapproved and as disliked as if the expressions are equivalent; see also Crick throughout.

5 See Crick above, p. 151.

6 Ibid., p. 144.

7 Thucydides: Pelopponesian War I, 38–40.

8 Republic VIII, 555–61, Cornford ed., pp. 274–80.

9 For example, Republic VIII, 546–8, Cornford, pp. 262–4.

10 Utilitarianism, Liberty, Representative Government, Everyman Library, pp. 70–1.

11 Locke, , Letter Concerning Toleration, Blackwell, Oxford, 1956, pp. 157–8Google Scholar.

12 Op. cit., pp. 72–3.

13 Hart, Law, Liberty and Morality, Oxford, 1963, p. 50.

14 See Crick above, p. 153.

15 Genovese, , The Political Economy of Slavery, New York, 1965, p. 1 Google Scholar.

16 Op. cit., p. 10.

17 The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill, London, 1970, ch. XIII.

18 Douglas, Mary, Natural Symbols, London, 1970, p. 3 Google Scholar.

19 Op. cit., Preface.

20 Rejections on the Revolution in France, New York, 1961, pp. 100–1.

21 Mill, op. cit., p. 153.

22 The Enforcement of Morals, London, 1965, pp. 15, 17.

23 Douglas, Mary, Purity and Danger, Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar

24 Karl Popper, Cf., The Open Society and Its Enemies, London, 1962, Vol.1, ch. 10Google Scholar.

25 See, e.g. W. G. Runciman, Sociology in its Place, ch. 3.

26 Natural Symbols, ch. II, pp. 156–7.

27 Mill, op. cit., p. 115.