Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:31:17.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sailing Along New Cleavages: Understanding the Electoral Success of the Swedish Pirate Party in the European Parliament Election 20091

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2013

Marie Demker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Swedish European Parliamentary Election in 2009 the Swedish Pirate Party took two seats in the parliament and 7.1 per cent of the Swedish voters’ support. The party was absolutely new and the usual concept of populist parties does not seem to fit the Pirate movement very well. It is anti-authoritarian and aims to enhance civic liberties for youngsters, to give open access to culture through the internet and to improve personal integrity and human dignity on the World Wide Web. Transnationalism is one foundation for the party but another is a value foundation of universal human rights and individual freedom, disregarding national borders. This article is an investigation of the Pirate Party as a possible new party family, driven by new sociopolitical cleavages in the modern information society.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 188 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Marie Demker is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Gothenburg. Contact email: marie.demker@pol.gu.se.

1

A Swedish version of this paper was published in Oscarsson and Holmberg (2011).

References

Aardal, B. (1994), ‘Hva er en politisk skillelinje?’, Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning, 35(2): 218–249.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S.Mair, P. (2007), Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates, 1885–1985 (Colchester: ECPR Classics) (first published 1990).Google Scholar
Bennett, L. (2003), ‘Communicating Global Activism: Strengths and Vulnerabilities of Networked Politics’, Information, Communication & Society, 6(2): 143–168.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1969), Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bjereld, U.Demker, M. (2006), ‘The Power of Knowledge and New Political Cleavages in a Globalized World: An Empirical Study of the “Free Logotypes”’, International Review of Sociology, 16(3): 499–515.Google Scholar
—— ——Bjereld, U.Demker, M.(2008), Kampen om kunskapen: Informationssamhällets politiska skiljelinjer (Stockholm: Hjalmarson and Högberg).Google Scholar
—— ——Bjereld, U., Demker, M. (2009), ‘The Transformation of Modern Global Society: Individualism and New Political Cleavages in the Information Age’, paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention in New York, 15–18 February 2009.Google Scholar
—— ——Bjereld, U.Demker, M. (2010), ‘Piratpartiet och informationssamhällets politiska skiljelinjer’, in K. Tovhult (ed.), Kunskap, Kommunikation, Kontroll. Drömmar och farhågor i informationssamhället (Creative Commons: Sharing Is Caring Förlag): 102–112.Google Scholar
Bjereld, U.Ekengren, A.M.Schierenbeck, I. (2009), ‘Power, Identity, Modernity: Individualisation and Destabilisation in a Globalised World: Introduction’, International Review of Sociology, 19(2): 263–272.Google Scholar
Bornschier, S. (2010), ‘The New Cultural Divide and the Two-dimensional Political Space in Western Europe’, West European Politics, 33(3): 419–444.Google Scholar
Carpentier, N., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., Nordenstreng, K., Hartmann, M., Vihalem, P., Cammaerts, B., Nieminen, H.Olsson, T. (2008), Democracy, Journalism and Technology: New Developments in an Enlarges Europe, ECREA European Media and Communication Doctoral Summer School (Tartu: Tartu University Press).Google Scholar
Castells, M. (1996–8), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2009), Communication Power (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dahlberg, S. (2011), ‘Premiär för TV-reklam’, in H. Oscarsson and S. Holmberg (eds), Väljarbeteende i Europaval, Report no. 27 Election Studies (Gothenburg: Statistics Sweden and University of Gothenburg): 191–201.Google Scholar
Denver, D. (2000), Elections and Voters in Britain (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Eriksson, J.Giacomello, G. (2009) (eds), ‘The Forum: Who Controls the Internet? Beyond the Obstinacy or Obsolescence of the State’, International Studies Review, 11: 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlingsson, G.Persson, M. (2010), ‘Utmanarna: Uppkomst, idéer och opinion’, Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 112(2): 229–247.Google Scholar
—— ——Erlingsson, G.Persson, M.(2011), ‘Varför Piratpartiet?’, in H. Oscarsson and S. Holmberg (eds), Väljarbeteende i Europaval, Report no. 27 Election Studies (Gothenburg: Statistics Sweden and University of Gothenburg): 139–148.Google Scholar
Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Florida, R. (2004), The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent (New York: HarperBusiness).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1971), L'ordre de discourse (Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
Holmberg, S.Oscarsson, H. (2004), Väljare. Svenskt väljarbeteende under 50 år (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1977), The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kittilson, M.C.Dalton, R.J. (2008), The Internet and Virtual Civil Society: The New Frontier of Social Capital (Irvine, CA: Center for the Study of Democracy, eScholarship, University of California).Google Scholar
Kriesi, H.P., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S.Frey, T. (2006), ‘Globalization and the Transformation of National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared’, European Journal of Political Research, 45(6): 921–956.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M.Rokkan, S. (1967), ‘Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments’, in S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds), Party Systems and Voter Alignment: Cross-National Perspectives (New York: Free Press): 1–64.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2006), ‘Cleavages’, in R.S. Katz and W. Crotty (eds), Handbook of Party Politics (London: Sage): 371–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manjikian, M.M. (2010), ‘From Global Village to Virtual Battlespace: The Colonizing of the Internet and the Extension of Realpolitik’, International Studies Quarterly, 54(2): 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oscarsson, H.Persson, M. (2009), ‘Piratpartiets sympatisörer’, in S. Holmberg and L. Weibull (eds), Svensk Höst, SOM-rapport 46 (Gothenburg: SOM-Institute, University of Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Oscarsson, H.Holmberg, S. (2011) (eds), Väljarbeteende i Europaval, Report no. 27 Swedish European Election Studies (Gothenburg: Statistics Sweden and University of Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Ringmar, E. (2007), A Blogger's Manifesto: Free Speech and Censorship in the Age of the Internet (London: Anthem Press).Google Scholar
Stubager, R. (2008), ‘Education Effects on Authoritarian–Libertarian Values: A Question of Socialization’, British Journal of Sociology, 59(2): 327–350.Google Scholar
Stubager, R. (2009), ‘Education-based Group Identity and Consciousness in the Authoritarian–Libertarian Value Conflict’, European Journal of Political Research, 48: 204–233.Google Scholar