Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009
Aristotle's theory of poetry is based upon two main propositions: the first, that poetry is imitation (μίμησις), and the second, that it aims at universality. The first of these propositions has seemed so shocking to modern aestheticians that they have endeavoured to modify it by translating μίμησις as ‘representation’, or, like Mr. Carritt, suggesting that what Aristotle was trying to say was that poetry is expression, as in Croce's theory of art as the expression of feeling. Yet Aristotle himself makes it quite clear that he did mean imitation by μίμησις, for in explanation he speaks of ‘making likenesses’ (ἀπεικάʒοντες) of objects. He also describes how painters and poets make likenesses which are better or worse than, or exactly like the real people, and discusses the enjoyment which we derive from looking at likenesses (εἰκόνας) even of things which are most unpleasant in real life. This shows that Aristotle was not thinking of ‘expression’ in the modern aesthetic sense.
page 120 note 1 What is Beauty? p. 108.Google Scholar Cf. Ross, W. D., Aristotle, p. 278.Google Scholar
page 120 note 2 Poet. 1447a.
page 120 note 3 1448a.
page 120 note 4 Prot. 319a.
page 120 note 5 Rep. 1.
page 121 note 1 Met. 1046b and 1048a.
page 121 note 2 ii. 1.
page 121 note 3 Gentile, , Filos. dell' Arte, p. 237.Google Scholar
page 122 note 1 1448b.
page 122 note 2 Ibid.
page 122 note 3 Gentile, , op. cit., p. 243.Google Scholar
page 123 note 1 1451a.