Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:29:53.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Myth of Narcissus: Ovid and the Problem of Subjectivity in Psychology*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2011

LEAH TOMKINS
Affiliation:
ltomkins746@btinternet.com

Extract

This article discusses an engagement between the worlds of classical poetry and contemporary empirical psychology. What starts with a return to a classical text through the lens of psychology turns into a review of psychology through the lens of the Classics, inspiring some fresh ideas about subjectivity and how to handle it in psychological research. The question of subjectivity is, of course, a key one for the humanities, because the personhood of the reader, the interpreter, or the researcher exerts a vital influence on the way in which any text is read and its meaning extracted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Acknowledgements: I am greatly indebted to Armand D'Angour, Virginia Eatough, Peta Fowler, and Philip Hardie for their constructive suggestions and encouragement at various stages during the development of the ideas for this article. An earlier version was presented at the 11th Don Fowler Memorial Lecture, University of Oxford, 2011.