Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:24:22.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Structure of Juvenal's Eleventh Satire1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Extract

The ostensible subject of this Satire is an invitation to dinner extended by Juvenal to his friend Persicus, with a description of the proposed menu, which gives rise to comments drawing an unfavourable comparison between Juvenal's meal and the prevalent dining habits of his day. In his justly famous study Professor Highet accepts this ostensible subject at its face value as the real subject of the Satire—his chapter on it is entitled ‘Dinner at Home’ (ch. 20)—and on p. 279, note 3, he tabulates the structure of the Satire as follows:

(a) lines 1–55: introductory chat.

(b) lines 56–63: the invitation.

(c) lines 64–89: the food (with reflections on old Roman manners).

(d) lines 90–135: the furniture and dishes (with reflections on manners old and new).

(e) lines 136–61: the servants and the wine.

(f) lines 162–82: the entertainment.

(g) lines 183–208: conclusion, the preliminary relaxation and comfortable bath.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 173 note 2 For reference to other poems on this subject, see Highet, G., Juvenal the Satirist (Oxford, 1954), 262 n. 1 on ch. 11, and 278 n. 1 on ch. 20.Google Scholar

page 175 note 1 Juvenal himself tells us that his book will be a hotch potch (Satire i. 85–6Google Scholar)—

quidquid agunt homines, votum timer ira voluptas gaudia discursus, nostri farrago libelli est

—but regarding Juvenal's work as a whole we must say that farrago was an unduly modest word to use of his ability to arrange his material.

page 177 note 1 It seems to be something of a literary convention to bring an impassioned piece to a quiet close; cf. Virgil, , Ecl. iGoogle Scholar; Hor. Od. iii. 5; Lucr. ii.Google Scholar