No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009
There were various conceptions of the function of history current in the ancient world. There was always one school of so-called historians who wrote with the motive of giving pleasure uppermost in their minds. The absence of a novel from classical literature left romance to invade history and oratory, and writers of this school might often be more properly called historical novelists than historians. They were especially susceptible to the influence of declamation and the rhetorical worship of style. For this school, in brief, history was nothing but the raw material for the literary artist. A second school, of which Polybius is the most prominent representative, held that history should be the training-ground of politicians, statesmen, and soldiers, who may learn from the past how to discover the real significance of events. Polybius naturally attached more importance to truth (which, he says, is to history what the eye is to the human body) than did those who wrote only for entertainment. Thirdly, there was the view that it is the function of history to teach men of all stations the lessons of the past, and by so teaching form and strengthen the individual moral character. This last is the view of Tacitus, though his conception of the function of history is broad enough to embrace the other two in a properly subordinate measure.
page 9 note 1 Pol. i. 14. 6.
page 9 note 2 Ann. iv. 32–3.Google Scholar
page 9 note 3 Bury, 's edition, vol. i. 79, note 4.Google Scholar
page 9 note 4 Ann. ibid.
page 10 note 1 Cf. Ann. iv. 65Google Scholar; vi. 28; xii. 24; Hist. iii. 51; iv. 48.Google Scholar
page 10 note 2 Plin. Ep. vii. 17. 3Google Scholar: cf. also Ep. v. 3, ad fin.Google Scholar
page 10 note 3 Plin. Ep. vii. 17. 3.Google Scholar
page 10 note 4 Hist. i. 1.Google Scholar
page 10 note 5 Thuc. i. 22.
page 10 note 6 Ann. iv. 33. 3–4Google Scholar; cf. vi. 7. 6.
page 10 note 7 Hist. ii. 50.Google Scholar
page 11 note 1 Hist. i. 1Google Scholar; cf. Ann. xi. 11.Google Scholar
page 11 note 2 Hist. iv. 73–4.Google Scholar
page 11 note 3 Hist. i. 1.Google Scholar
page 11 note 4 Hist. i. 16.Google Scholar
page 11 note 5 Ann. iv. 33.Google Scholar
page 11 note 6 Ann. iv. 33Google Scholar: cf. Plin. Ep. iii. 20. 12.Google Scholar
page 11 note 7 Germ. ii. 3.Google Scholar
page 11 note 8 Agr. 3.
page 12 note 1 Hist. iv. 8.Google Scholar
page 12 note 2 Hist. i. 16.Google Scholar
page 12 note 3 Agr. 42. 5.Google Scholar
page 12 note 4 Hist. iv. 8.Google Scholar
page 12 note 5 Agr. 42.Google Scholar
page 12 note 6 Ann. iv. 20.Google Scholar
page 13 note 1 Hist. iv. 5.Google Scholar
page 13 note 2 ‘Callidi temporum et sapientes’—Ann. iv. 33. 2Google Scholar; cf. Lucian's ‘σύνεσις πολιτική’: cf. also Plat. Gorg. 510 sqq.
page 13 note 3 Ann. iv. 33.Google Scholar
page 13 note 4 Hist. i. 16.Google Scholar
page 13 note 5 Agr. 3: cf. Gibbon, , vol. vii, p. 261.Google Scholar
page 14 note 1 Agr. 46.
page 14 note 2 Hist. iii. 51.Google Scholar
page 14 note 3 Ann. iii. 65.Google Scholar
page 14 note 4 Cf. Hist. ii. 69Google Scholar; iii. 51; Ann. iii. 26–8Google Scholar; Germ. passim.
page 15 note 1 Ann. iv. 32–3.Google Scholar
page 15 note 2 Cf. Agr. ii. 5.Google Scholar
page 15 note 3 Shakespeare, , Sonnet 107.Google Scholar
page 15 note 4 Hist. i. 3.Google Scholar
page 15 note 5 Hist. iii. 23.Google Scholar
page 15 note 6 Cf. Dial. 18. 3; Agr. ad init.; Ann. ii. 88.Google Scholar
page 15 note 7 Ann. iii. 55.Google Scholar
page 16 note 1 Hist. iii. 68.Google Scholar
page 16 note 2 Hist. iii. 84.Google Scholar
page 16 note 3 Hist. iii. 86.Google Scholar
page 16 note 4 Ann. xv. 57.Google Scholar
page 16 note 5 Ann. xiv. 63–4.Google Scholar
page 16 note 6 Clio, a Muse.'