Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:10:43.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Answers to Criticisms of My Discussions of the Ineffability of God

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Harry A. Wolfson
Harry A. Wolfson
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 02138
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Observations
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , April 1974 , pp. 186 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 56–57 (1947) 233–249Google Scholar, reprinted in Studies in the History of Philosophy and Religion, v. I, 98–114.

2 Studies, I, pp. 103–104.

3 Philo, II, pp. 94–126.

4 Ibid., pp. 149–160.

5 Ibid., pp. 111–118.

6 Revue des Etudes Anciennes 60 (1958) 446–448Google Scholar, quoted with evident approval by Feldman, Louis H. in his “Scholarship on Philo and Josephus,” Studies in Judaism (1937–1962), Yeshiva UniversityGoogle Scholar.

7 “Basilides on the Ineffability of God,” Harvard Theological Review 62 (1969) 368, n. 4Google Scholar.

8 Journal of Theological Studies 49 (1948) 211Google Scholar.

9 Cf. my discussion in The Philosophy of the Church Fathers, I, pp. 85–86, and nn. 89–94, of attempts to identify Aristotle's God with his fifth element in passages quoted in the names of Athenagores, Clement of Alexandria, the Recognitiones of Clement of Rome, and Lactantius.

10 Classical Review 63 (1949) 24–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 In the same passage, Cicero refers to Plato's “books of the Laws” where Plato is quoted by him as saying “that no inquiry at all ought to be made into what God is.” The reference is to the opening words of a discussion in Laws VII, 821 A, where, however, in the course of the discussion it is made clear that the nature of God is a fit and possible subject of inquiry. Cf. also Laws XII, 966C and Cicero's own subsequent comments in the same passage in De Natura Deorum III on Plato's treatment of God in his Timaeus and Laws.

12 This explanation may apply also to Seneca's description of God as having no name referred to in my Philo, II, p. 113 at n. 25. Cf. also my discussion in Philo, II, pp. 115–116, of the expression “the unknown God” in Acts 17:23.

13 Cf. above at n. 2. Chadwick quotes also a passage from Philo's De Gigantibus 8 against my view that Philo denied the existence of souls in the spheres (op. cit., p. 25, Col. 1). I myself have quoted that passage from De Gigantibus and explained it (cf. Philo I, p. 364). Evidently Chadwick does not agree with my explanation.

14 Op. and loc. cit. above n. 7.

15 Ibid.

16 Cf. Studies, I, pp. 371–401.

17 Ibid., pp. 387–389 and 140–141.

18 Ibid., pp. 131–142.

19 Op. cit. (above n. 6), p. 370, at n. 9.

20 Ibid., at nn. 10–15.

21 Cf. Indexes of their respective works.