Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:32:36.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reforming medical governance in Europe. What is it about institutions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

VIOLA BURAU*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark
DAVID WILSFORD
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Public and International Affairs, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
GEORGE FRANCE
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Institute for the Study of Regionalism, Federalism and Self-government, Rome, Italy
*
*Correspondence to: Viola Burau, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus, Bartholins Allé, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Email: viola@ps.au.dk

Abstract

This article presents a cross-national analytical framework for understanding current attempts to reform medical governance – in particular, those by third parties to control the practice of medicine. The framework pays particular attention to the ways in which institutions shape policy reform. The article also outlines the main comparative findings of case studies of selected reforms and associated processes of negotiations in Denmark, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom. These four countries were selected because they are characterised by theoretically interesting variations in the institutional contexts of medical governance. The analysis suggests that although all the four countries have pushed for more control over the way in which doctors practise medicine, in response to similar imperatives, each country differs in the path it has taken. More specifically, the instruments and techniques brought to bear in each case vary considerably and are directed by a country's political institutions towards a unique path.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allsop, J. and Mulcahy, L. (1996), Regulating Medical Work. Formal and Informal Controls, Buckingham: Open University.Google Scholar
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R. A. W. (2003), Interpreting British Governance, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burau, V. (2001), ‘Medical reform in Germany: the 1993 health care legislation as an impromptu success’, in Bovens, M., ‘t Hart, P. and Peters, B. G. (eds), Success and Failure in Public Governance: A Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Burau, V. (2005), ‘Comparing professions through actor-centred governance: community nursing in Britain and Germany’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 27: 114137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dent, M. (2003), Remodelling Hospitals and Health Professions in Europe. Medicine, Nursing and the State, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, C.-A., Dixon, A., and McKee, M. (2005), ‘Reshaping the regulation of the workforce in European health care systems’, in Dubois, C.-A., Nolte, E. and McKee, M.(eds), Human Resources for Health in Europe, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (1970), Profession of Medicine. A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge, New York: Dodd Mead.Google Scholar
Gray, A. and Harrison, S. (eds) (2004), Governing Medicine. Theory and Practice, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, T. B. and Vrangbæk, K. (2004), Det offentlige styringsunivers. Fra government til governance, Århus: Magtudredningen, Aarhus Universitet.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. (2000), ‘Societal governance: levels, models, and orders of socio-political interaction’, in Pierre, J. (ed), Debating Governance. Authority, Steering and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2000), ‘Path dependence in historical sociology’, Theory and Society, 29: 507548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Moran, M. (1999), Governing the Health Care State. A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the United States and Germany, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, M. (2000), ‘Understanding the welfare state: the case of health care’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2: 135160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J. (2001), Modernising Governance. New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, J. and Peters, B. G. (2000), Governance, Politics and the State, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000), ‘Governance and public administration’, in Pierre, J. (ed), Debating Governance. Authority, Steering and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salter, B. (2004), The New Politics of Medicine, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R.W. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (1999), ‘Historical institutionalism in comparative politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 369404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. and Steinmo, S. (1992), ‘Historical institutionalism in comparative politics’, in Steinmo, S. and Thelen, K. (eds), Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vrangbæk, K. (1999), ‘New public management i sygehusfeltet – udforming og konsekvensker’, in Bentsen, E., Zeuthen, B., Erlingsdottir, F. and Sahlin-Andersen, K. (eds), Når styringsambitioner møder praksis – Den svære omstilling af sygehus- og sundhedsvæsenet i Danmark og Sverige, København: Handelshøjskolens forlag.Google Scholar
Wilsford, D. (1994), ‘Path dependency, or why history makes it difficult but not impossible to reform health care systems in a big way’, Journal of Public Policy, 14: 285309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilsford, D. (1995), ‘States facing interests: struggles over health care policy in advanced industrial democracies’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 20: 571613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilsford, D. (2007), ‘Sticky structures and immense entanglements: Why ‘do-able’ reforms are so hard to come by in almost every country’, in Rosen, B. (ed), Health Systems: Are We in a Post-Reform Era?, Jerusalem: NIHP, pp 309–318.Google Scholar