Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:00:32.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making sense of complexity: the contribution of Rudolf Klein to our understanding of The New Politics of the NHS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2014

Jan-Kees Helderman
Jan-Kees Helderman*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Department of Public Administration & Political Science, Institute for Management Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
*Correspondence to: Jan-Kees Helderman, Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration & Political Science, Institute for Management Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9108, 6500 HK Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Email: j.helderman@fm.ru.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 229 - 235
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hacker, J. S. (2002), The Divided Welfare State. The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2005), ‘Policy Drift: the Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment’, in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds), Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40–82.Google Scholar
Helderman, J. K. and Stiller, S. (2014), ‘The importance of order and complements: a new way to understand the Dutch and German health insurance reforms’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 39(4): 811–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschman, A. O. (1991), The Rhetoric of Reaction, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. and Lindblom, C. E. (1962), ‘Economic development, research and development, policy making: some converging views’, Behavioral science, 7(2): 211–222.Google Scholar
Klein, R. (2013), The New Politics of the NHS. From Creation to Reinvention. Seventh edition, London: Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. (1979), ‘Still muddling, not yet through’, Public Administration Review, 39: 517–526.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2010), ‘A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change’, in J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds), Explaining Institutional Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B. (2005), Social Traps and the Problem of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1997), Games Real Actors Play, Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2009), Re-forming Capitalism, Institutional Change in the German Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005), Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004), How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1968), Economy and Society, vols 1 and 2, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1979), Speaking Truth to Power. The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar