Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:19:31.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paying for hospital care: the experience with implementing activity-based funding in five European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Jacqueline O'Reilly ,
Reinhard Busse ,
Unto Häkkinen ,
Zeynep Or ,
Andrew Street  and
Miriam Wiley
Jacqueline O'Reilly*
Affiliation:
Research Analyst, Health Research and Information Division, Economic and Social Research Institute, Ireland
Reinhard Busse
Affiliation:
Professor and Head of Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Germany
Unto Häkkinen
Affiliation:
Research Professor, Centre for Health and Social Economics, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland
Zeynep Or
Affiliation:
Research Director, Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics, France
Andrew Street
Affiliation:
Professor of Health Economics, Director, Health Policy team, Director, Economics of Social and Health Care Research Unit, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, England
Miriam Wiley
Affiliation:
Research Professor and Head of Health Research and Information Division, Economic and Social Research Institute, Ireland
*
*Correspondence to: Jacqueline O'Reilly, Health Research and Information Division, Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland. E-mail: jacqueline.oreilly@esri.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following the US experience, activity-based funding has become the most common mechanism for reimbursing hospitals in Europe. Focusing on five European countries (England, Finland, France, Germany and Ireland), this paper reviews the motivation for introducing activity-based funding, together with the empirical evidence available to assess the impact of implementation. Despite differences in the prevailing approaches to reimbursement, the five countries shared several common objectives, albeit with different emphasis, in moving to activity-based funding during the 1990s and 2000s. These include increasing efficiency, improving quality of care and enhancing transparency. There is substantial cross-country variation in how activity-based funding has been implemented and developed. In Finland and Ireland, for instance, activity-based funding is principally used to determine hospital budgets, whereas the models adopted in the other three countries are more similar to the US approach. Assessing the impact of activity-based funding is complicated by a shortage of rigorous empirical evaluations. What evidence is currently available, though, suggests that the introduction of activity-based funding has been associated with an increase in activity, a decline in length of stay and/or a reduction in the rate of growth in hospital expenditure in most of the countries under consideration.

Type
Articles
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , 05 January 2012 , pp. 73 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aas, I. H. M. (1995), ‘Incentives and financing methods’, Health Policy, 34(3): 205–220.Google ScholarPubMed
Audit Commission (2008a), PbR Data Assurance Framework 2007/08. Findings from the First Year of the National Clinical Coding Audit Programme, London: Audit Commission.Google Scholar
Audit Commission (2008b), The Right Result? Payment by Results 2003-07, London: Audit Commission.Google Scholar
Audit Commission (2009), PbR Data Assurance Framework 2008/09. Key Messages from Year 2 of the National Clinical Coding Audit Programme, London: Audit Commission.Google Scholar
Audit Commission (2010), Improving Data Quality in the NHS: Annual Report of the PbR Assurance Programme, London: Audit Commission.Google Scholar
Bellanger, M. M.Tardif, L. (2006), ‘Accounting and reimbursement schemes for inpatient care in France’, Health Care Management Science, 9(3): 295–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Böcking, W., Ahrens, U., Kirch, W.Milakovic, M. (2005), ‘First results of the introduction of DRGs in Germany and overview of experience from other DRG countries’, Journal of Public Health, 13(3): 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, S. (2005), ‘Payment by results in England’, Euro Observer, 7(4): 1–4.Google Scholar
Brick, A., Nolan, A., O'Reilly, J.Smith, S. (2010), Resource Allocation, Financing and Sustainability in Health Care: Evidence for the Expert Group on Resource Allocation and Financing in the Health Sector, Dublin: Department of Health and Children and Economic and Social Research Institute.Google Scholar
Busse, R., Geissler, A., Quentin, W.Wiley, M. (eds) (2011), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Busse, R.Riesberg, A. (2004), Health Care Systems in Transition: Germany, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.Google Scholar
Busse, R., Schreyögg, J.Smith, P. C. (2006), ‘Editorial: Hospital case payment systems in Europe’, Health Care Management Science, 9(3): 211–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, A. (1996), ‘Why are we trying to reduce length of stay? Evaluation of the costs and benefits of reducing time in hospital must start from the objectives that govern change’, Quality in Health Care, 5(3): 172–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Commission on Health Funding (1989), Report of the Commission on Health Funding, Dublin: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Daidone, S.Street, A. (2011), Estimating the Costs of Specialised Care. CHE Research Paper 61, York: University of York.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2007), ‘Payment by Results Guidance 2008/09’, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_081334.pdf [4 March 2011].Google Scholar
Department of Health (2009), ‘Patient-Level Information and Costing Systems (PLICS)’, http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Managingyourorganisation/Financeandplanning/NHScostingmanual/DH_080056 [24 August 2010].Google Scholar
Department of Health (2010), ‘Payment by Results Guidance for 2010-11’, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_112970.pdf [17 February 2011].Google Scholar
Department of Health (2011), ‘Payment by Results Guidance for 2011-12’, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_124522.pdf [28 February 2011].Google Scholar
Ellis, R. P. (1998), ‘Creaming, skimping and dumping: provider competition on the intensive and extensive margins’, Journal of Health Economics, 17(5): 537–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, R. P.Vidal-Fernández, M. (2007), ‘Activity-based payments and reforms of the English hospital payment system’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2(4): 435–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, D.Mason, A. (2006), ‘Costs and prices for inpatient care in England: mirror twins or distant cousins’?, Health Care Management Science, 9(3): 233–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ettelt, S., Nolte, E. (2010), ‘Funding intensive care – approaches in systems using diagnosis-related groups’, http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2010/RAND_TR792.pdf [17 June 2010].Google Scholar
Ettelt, S., Thomson, S., Nolte, E.Mays, N. (2006), Reimbursing Highly Specialised Hospital Services: The Experience of Activity-Based Funding in Eight Countries, London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.Google Scholar
Farrar, S., Sussex, J., Yi, D., Sutton, M., Chalkley, M., Scott, T.Ma, A. (2007), National Evaluation of Payment by Results, Aberdeen: Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Farrar, S., Yi, D., Sutton, M., Chalkley, M., Sussex, J.Scott, A. (2009), ‘Has payment by results affected the way that English hospitals provide care? Difference-in-differences analysis’, British Medical Journal, 339: b3047doi:10.1136/bmj.b3047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friesner, D. L.Rosenman, R. (2004), ‘Inpatient-outpatient cost shifting in Washington hospitals’, Health Care Management Science, 7(1): 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geissler, A., Scheller-Kreinsen, D.Busse, R. (2011), ‘Germany: Understanding G-DRGs’, in R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin and M. Wiley (eds), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Goldfield, N. (2010), ‘The evolution of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): from its beginnings in case-mix and resource use theory, to its implementation for payment and now for its current utilization for quality within and outside the hospital’, Quality Management in Health Care, 19(1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greß, S., Focke, A., Hessel, F.Wasem, J. (2006), ‘Financial incentives for disease management programmes and integrated care in German social health insurance’, Health Policy, 78(2–3): 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häkkinen, U. (2005), ‘The impact of changes in Finland's health care system’, Health Economics, 14(Supplement 1): S101–S118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Häkkinen, U. (2010), ‘Financing of hospital care in Finland’, Euro Observer, 12(3): 10–12.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, U.Linna, M. (2005), ‘DRGs in Finnish health care’, Euro Observer, 7(4): 7–8.Google Scholar
Health Service Executive (2008), ‘Consultant Contract 2008 – measurement of public:private mix’, http://www.hse.ie/eng/staff/HR/tandc/Consultant_Contract_2008_-_Measurement_of_Public_Private_Mix.pdf [4 August 2010].Google Scholar
Health Service Executive (2010a), ‘Casemix Budget Outturns for 2009’, http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/Publications/corporate/2009casemix.html [12 May 2010].Google Scholar
Health Service Executive (2010b), ‘HealthStat – Supporting High Performance’, http://www.hse.ie/eng/staff/Healthstat/about/ [4 August 2010].Google Scholar
Health Service Executive (2010c), HSE National Service Plan 2010, Dublin: Health Service Executive.Google Scholar
Health Service Executive (2010d), National Service Plan 2011, Dublin: Health Service Executive.Google Scholar
Henschke, C., Bäumler, M., Weid, S., Gaskins, M.Busse, R. (2010), ‘Extrabudgetary (“NUB”) payments: a gateway for introducing new medical devices into the German inpatient reimbursement system’? Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare, 3(2): 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensen, P., Beissert, S., Bruckner-Tuderman, L., Luger, T. A., Roeder, N.Muller, M. L. (2008), ‘Introduction of diagnosis-related groups in Germany: evaluation of impact on in-patient care in a dermatological setting’, European Journal of Public Health, 18(1): 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegers, M., Kesteloot, K., De Graeve, D.Gilles, W. (2002), ‘A typology for provider payment systems in health care’, Health Policy, 60(3): 255–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, K. L., Rubenstein, L. V., Draper, D., Kosecoff, J., Rogers, W. H., Keeler, E. B.Brook, R. H. (1990), ‘The effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system on quality of care for hospitalized Medicare patients: an introduction to the series’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(15): 1953–1955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kautianen, K., Häkkinen, U.Lauharanta, J. (2011), ‘Finland: DRGs in a Decentralized Health Care System’, in R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin and M. Wiley (eds), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kimberly, J. R.de Pouvourville, G. and Associates (1993), The Migration of Managerial Innovation: Diagnosis-Related Groups and Health Care Administration in Western Europe, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
Kimberly, J. R., de Pouvourville, G.D'Aunno, T. (2008), The Globalization of Managerial Innovation in Health Care, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kittelsen, S. A. C., Anthun, K. S., Kalseth, B., Kalseth, J., Halsteinli, V., Magnussen, J. (2009), ‘En komparativ analyse av spesialisthelsetjenesten i Finland, Sverige, Danmark og Norge: Aktivitet, ressursbruk og produktivitet 2005–2007’, http://www.sintef.no/upload/Helse/%C3%98KT/Pdf-filer/SINTEF_Rapport_A12200-Analyse_speshelsetjenesten_Finland-Sverige-Danmark-Norge.pdf [2 March 2011].Google Scholar
Kobel, C., Thuilliez, J., Bellanger, M.Pfeiffer, K.-P. (2011), ‘DRG Systems and Similar Patient Classification Systems in Europe’, in R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin and M. Wiley (eds), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kosecoff, J., Kahn, K. L., Rogers, W. H., Reinisch, E. J., Sherwood, M. J., Rubenstein, L. V., Draper, D., Roth, C. P., Chew, C.Brook, R. H. (1990), ‘Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge: the “quicker-and-sicker” story revisited’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(15): 1980–1983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutzin, J. (2001), ‘A descriptive framework for country-level analysis of health care financing arrangements’, Health Policy, 56(3): 171–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langenbrunner, J., Orosz, E., Kutzin, J.Wiley, M. M. (2005), ‘Purchasing and Paying Providers’, in J. Figueras, R. Robinson and E. Jakubowski (eds), Purchasing to Improve Health Systems Performance, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Langenbrunner, J. C.Wiley, M. M. (2002), ‘Hospital Payment Mechanisms: Theory and Practice in Transition Countries’, in M. McKee and J. Healy (eds), Hospitals in a Changing Europe, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Leister, J. E.Stausberg, J. (2005), ‘Comparison of cost accounting methods from different DRG systems and their effect on health care quality’, Health Policy, 74(1): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linna, M.Häkkinen, U. (2008), ‘Benchmarking Finnish Hospitals’, in J. Blank and V. Valdmanis (eds), Evaluating Hospital Policy and Performance: Contributions from Hospital Policy and Productivity Research, Oxford: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Linna, M., Häkkinen, U.Magnussen, J. (2006), ‘Comparing hospital cost efficiency between Norway and Finland’, Health Policy, 77(3): 268–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linna, M., Häkkinen, U., Peltola, M., Magnussen, J., Anthun, K., Kittelsen, S., Roed, A., Olsen, K., Medin, E.Rehnberg, C. (2010), ‘Measuring cost efficiency in the Nordic Hospitals – a cross-sectional comparison of public hospitals in 2002’, Health Care Management Science, 13(4): 346–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lungen, M., Dredge, B., Rose, A., Roebuck, C., Plamper, E., Lauterbach, K.The Working Group (2004), ‘Using diagnosis-related groups: the situation in the United Kingdom National Health Service and in Germany’, European Journal of Health Economics, 5(4): 287–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lungen, M.Lapsley, I. (2003), ‘The reform of hospital financing in Germany: an international solution’?, Journal of Health Organization and Management, 17(5): 360–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mannion, R., Marini, G.Street, A. (2008), ‘Implementing payment by results in the English NHS: changing incentives and the role of information’, Journal of Health Organization and Management, 22(1): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mannion, R., Street, A. (2005), Payment by Results and Demand Management: Learning from the South Yorkshire laboratory. CHE Research Paper 14, York: University of York.Google Scholar
Mason, A., Goddard, M. (2009), Payment by Results in Mental Health: A Review of the International Literature and an Economic Assessment of the Approach in the English NHS. CHE Research Paper 50, York: University of York.Google Scholar
Mason, A., Street, A., Miraldo, M.Siciliani, L. (2009), ‘Should prospective payments be differentiated for public and private healthcare providers’?, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 4(Pt 4): 383–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, A., Ward, P.Street, A. (2011), ‘England: The Healthcare Resource Group System’, in R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin and M. Wiley (eds), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
McDaid, D., Wiley, M., Maresso, A.Mossialos, E. (2009), ‘Ireland: health system review’, Health Systems in Transition, 11(4): 1–268.Google Scholar
McNair, P., Luft, H.Bindman, A. (2009), ‘Medicare's policy not to pay for treating hospital-acquired conditions: the impact’, Health Affairs, 28(5): 1485–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelot, X.Rodrigues, J.-M. (2008), ‘DRGs in France’, in J. Kimberly, G. de Pouvourville and T. D'Aunno (eds), The Globalization of Managerial Innovation in Health Care, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mikkola, H. (2003), ‘Hospital pricing reform in the public health care system–an empirical case study from Finland’, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 3(4): 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkola, H.Häkkinen, U. (2002), ‘The effects of case-based pricing on length of stay for common surgical procedures’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7(2): 90–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Health (2009), ‘Rapport 2009 au Parlement sur la tarification à l'activité (T2A)’, http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_T2A_2009.pdf [1 March 2011].Google Scholar
Ministry of Health (2010), ‘Rapport 2010 au Parlement sur la tarification à l'activité (T2A)’, http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_T2A_2010.pdf [1 March 2011].Google Scholar
Miraldo, M., Goddard, M., Smith, P. C. (2006), The Incentive Effects of Payment by Results. CHE Research Paper 19, London: Dr Foster Intelligence.Google Scholar
Moreno-Serra, R.Wagstaff, A. (2010), ‘System-wide impacts of hospital payment reforms: evidence from Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia’, Journal of Health Economics, 29(4): 585–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newhouse, J. P. (1996), ‘Reimbursing health plans and health providers: efficiency in production versus selection’, Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3): 1236–1263.Google Scholar
NHS Information Centre (2010), ‘Healthcare Resource Groups 4 (HRG4)’, www.ic.nhs.uk/services/the-casemix-service/new-to-this-service/healthcare-resource-groups-4-hrg4 [17 June 2010].Google Scholar
O'Reilly, J., McCarthy, B.Wiley, M. (2011), ‘Ireland: A Review of Casemix Applications Within the Acute Public Hospital System’, in R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin and M. Wiley (eds), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, A. (2005), ‘The English National Health Service: 1979–2005’, Health Economics, 14(Supplement 1): S75–S99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Or, Z. (2009), ‘Activity based payment in France’, Euro Observer, 11(4): 5–6.Google Scholar
Or, Z.Bellanger, M. (2011), ‘France: Implementing Homogeneous Patient Groups in a Mixed Market’, in R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin and M. Wiley (eds), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Or, Z.Häkkinen, U. (2011), ‘DRGs and Quality: For Better or Worse’?, in R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin and M. Wiley (eds), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Pronovost, P. J., Goeschel, C. A.Wachter, R. M. (2008), ‘The wisdom and justice of not paying for “preventable complications” ’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(18): 2197–2199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Propper, C., Sutton, M., Whitnall, C., Windmeijer, F. (2007), Did ‘targets and terror’ reduce English waiting times for elective hospital care?, CMPO Working Paper no. 07/179, Bristol: Centre for Market and Public Organisation.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. A.Browne, M. J. (2001), ‘The impact of the inpatient prospective payment system and diagnosis-related groups: a survey of the literature’, North American Actuarial Journal, 5(4): 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheller-Kreinsen, D., Geissler, A.Busse, R. (2009), ‘The ABC of DRGs’, Euro Observer, 11(4): 1–5.Google Scholar
Schreyögg, J., Stargardt, T., Tiemann, O.Busse, R. (2006a), ‘Methods to determine reimbursement rates for diagnosis related groups (DRG): a comparison of nine European countries’, Health Care Management Science, 9(3): 215–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreyögg, J., Tiemann, O.Busse, R. (2005), ‘The DRG reimbursement system in Germany’, Euro Observer, 7(4): 4–6.Google Scholar
Schreyögg, J., Tiemann, O.Busse, R. (2006b), ‘Cost accounting to determine prices: how well do prices reflect costs in the German DRG-system’?, Health Care Management Science, 9(3): 269–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shleifer, A. (1985), ‘A theory of yardstick competition’, RAND Journal of Economics, 16(3): 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. C.Street, A. (2005), ‘Measuring the efficiency of public services: the limits of analysis’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(2): 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbusch, P. J., Oostenbrink, J. B., Zuurbier, J. J.Schaepkens, F. J. (2007), ‘The risk of upcoding in casemix systems: a comparative study’, Health Policy, 81(2-3): 289–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Street, A. (2006), ‘Reform of Hospital Funding and the Introduction of Patient Choice in England’, http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/che/pdf/REES%205-2%20English.pdf [24 August 2010].Google Scholar
Street, A.Maynard, A. (2007), ‘Activity based financing in England: the need for continual refinement of payment by results’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2(4): 419–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Street, A., Miraldo, M. (2007), ‘The impact of the reform of hospital funding in England’, Paper presented at Evaluating Health Policy: New Evidence from Administrative Data, University of York, http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/che-2007-impactreform.pdf [15 August 2011].Google Scholar
Street, A., O'Reilly, J., Ward, P.Mason, A. (2011), ‘DRG-Based Hospital Payment and Efficiency: Theory, Evidence, and Challenges’, in R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin and M. Wiley (eds), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Street, A., Scheller-Kreinsen, D., Geissler, A., Busse, R. (2010), Determinants of hospital costs and performance variation: methods, models and variables for the EuroDRG Project, Working Papers in Health Policy and Management Volume 3, Berlin: Berlin University of Technology.Google Scholar
Street, A., Vitikainen, K., Bjorvatn, A., Hvenegaard, A. (2007), Introducing activity-based financing: a review of experience in Australia, Denmark, Norway and Sweden, CHE Research Paper 30, York: University of York.Google Scholar
Sussex, J.Farrar, S. (2009), ‘Activity-based funding for National Health Service hospitals in England: managers’ experience and expectations’, European Journal of Health Economics, 10(2): 197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, S. S., Serdén, L., Geissler, A., van Ineveld, M., Redekop, K., Heurgren, M.Hakkaart-van Roijen, L. (2011), ‘DRGs and Cost Accounting: Which is Driving Which’?, in R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin and M. Wiley (eds), Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1985), Medicare's Prospective Payment System: Strategies for Evaluating Cost, Quality, and Medical Technology, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vuorenkoski, L., Mladovsky, P.Mossialos, E. (2008), ‘Finland: health system review’, Health Systems in Transition, 10(4): 1–168.Google Scholar
Wiley, M. (2005a), ‘Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs): Measuring Hospital Case Mix’, in P. Armitage and T. Colton (eds), Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Wiley, M. M. (2005b), ‘The Irish health system: developments in strategy, structure, funding and delivery since 1980’, Health Economics, 14(Supplement 1): S169–S186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed