Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:30:09.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel, Marxism and Mysticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Ian Fraser
Ian Fraser*
Affiliation:
Nottingham Trent University
Get access

Abstract

Marx's comments on Hegel's philosophy have left an ambiguous legacy for Marxism. One pervasive theme, though, is the interpretation of Hegel's idealist philosophy as being shrouded in mysticism. Marx's main contribution, according to this view, was to demystify Hegel's thought through a more materialist dialectical approach. At the same time, however, there have been those who have sought to rupture this Hegel-Marx connection and purge Hegelianism from Marxism altogether. Appropriate and expunge have therefore been the two main responses to Hegel's influence on Marxism. I will argue against these traditions, however, to assert a more direct relationship between Hegel's and Marx's dialectic. To do so, I want to identify some of the main Marxist thinkers that can be linked with the two main schools above. I will term these the Hegelian-Marxist Materialist Appropriators and the Idealist Expungers. In contrast I put forward the Hegelian-Marxist Materialist school which states that ultimately the dialectic of Hegel is the dialectic of Marx. Before this, I begin by considering some examples of Marx's critique of Hegel. The leitmotif of this critique is a depiction of Hegel's dialectic as mystical or idealistic in contrast to Marx's more materialist dialectic. As we shall see, such a criticism was begun by Marx, perpetuated by Engels as ‘orthodox’ Marxism and ultimately accepted even by those who sought to place themselves within an Hegelian-Marxist tradition.

Type
Hegel Today
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 21 , Issue 1-2: number 41/42 , 2000 , pp. 18 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a more extensive examination of the Hegel-Marx connection albeit with a different emphasis than the position adopted here, see Fraser, I. & Burns, T., ‘Introduction: An Historical Survey of the Hegel-Marx Connection’, in Burns, T. & Fraser, I. (eds.) The Hegel-Marx Connection (London: Macmillan, 2000)Google Scholar.

2 Marx, K., Critique of Hegel's Doctrine of the State in Marx, K., Early Writings (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1992), p. 80 Google Scholar.

3 Marx, K., Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts in Marx, , Early Writings, p. 386 Google Scholar.

4 Marx, , Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, pp. 386 & 385Google Scholar.

5 Marx, , Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, p. 384 Google Scholar.

6 Marx, , Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, p. 385 Google Scholar.

7 Marx, , Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, p. 384 Google Scholar.

8 Marx, , Theses on Feuerbach, in Marx, , Early Writings, pp. 421–3Google Scholar.

9 Marx, , Theses on Feuerbach, p. 423 Google Scholar.

10 Marx, K. & Engels, F., Selected Correspondence (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1975), p. 93 Google Scholar. After Marx's death, Engels indicated that Marx had left this ‘outline of dialectics’ amongst his manuscripts. The outline, however, never appeared. Marx, K. & Engels, F., Collected Works, 47 (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1993), p. 3 Google Scholar.

11 Marx, K., Grundrisse (London: Pelican Books, 1973), p. 85 Google Scholar.

12 Marx, , Grundrisse, pp. 100–1Google Scholar.

13 Marx, , Grundrisse, p. 101 Google Scholar.

14 Marx, , Grundrisse, p. 101 Google Scholar.

15 Marx, , Grundrisse, p. 101 Google Scholar.

16 Marx, , Grundrisse, p. 101 Google Scholar.

17 K. Marx, , Capital, Vol. 1 (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books), p. 102 Google Scholar.

18 Marx, , Capital, Vol. 1, p. 102 Google Scholar.

19 Marx, , Capital, Vol. 1, p. 103 Google Scholar.

20 Marx, , Capital, Vol. 1, p. 100 Google Scholar.

21 Marx, , Capital, Vol. 1, p. 102 Google Scholar.

22 Marx, , Capital, Vol. 1, p. 102 Google Scholar.

23 Marx, , Capital, Vol. 1, p. 100 Google Scholar.

24 Marx, , Capital, Vol. 1, pp. 102–3Google Scholar.

25 Marx, , Capital, Vol. 1, p. 103 Google Scholar.

26 Engels, F., Anti-Dühring (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Engels, F., Socialism, Utopian and Scientific, in Marx, K. & Engels, F., Selected Works, in two volumes (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1958), Vol. IIGoogle Scholar; Engels, F., Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy, in Marx, K. & Engels, F., Selected Works, Vol. II Google Scholar.

27 Engels, , Ludwig Feuerbach, p. 361 Google Scholar.

28 Engels, , Ludwig Feuerbach, pp. 361–2Google Scholar.

29 Engels, , Ludwig Feuerbach, p. 361 Google Scholar.

30 Engels, , Ludwig Feuerbach, p. 362 Google Scholar.

31 Engels, , Ludwig Feuerbach, pp. 365–6Google Scholar.

32 For a recent re-affirmation and overview, see Boger, G., ‘On the Materialist Appropriation of Hegel's Dialectical Method’, Science & Society, 55, 1 (Spring, 1991)Google Scholar.

33 Lenin, V. I., ‘Philosophical Notebooks’, in Lenin, V.I., Collected Works, Vol. 38 (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1972)Google Scholar. This is not to deny that for some Lenin can also be interpreted as simply following Engels' orthodoxy. On the latter view, see Lichtheim, G., From Marx to Hegel and Other Essays (London: Orbach and Chambers, 1971), p. 4 Google Scholar. For the depiction of Lenin as the first Hegelian Marxist, see Anderson, K., Lenin, Hegel and Western Marxism: A Critical Study (Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

34 Lenin, , ‘Philosophical Notebooks’, p. 234 Google Scholar.

35 Lenin, , ‘Philosophical Notebooks’, p. 276 Google Scholar.

36 Lenin, , ‘Philosophical Notebooks’, pp. 360 & 212Google Scholar.

37 Lukács, G., History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, trans. Livingstone, R. (London: Merlin Press, 1971), pp. 3–4 Google Scholar.

38 Lukács, , History and Class Consciousness, p. 17 Google Scholar.

39 Lukács, , History and Class Consciousness, pp. 17–18 Google Scholar.

40 Lukács, , History and Class Consciousness, p. 17 Google Scholar.

41 Merquior, J.G., Western Marxism (London: Paladin Books, 1986), p. 74 Google Scholar.

42 Lukács, , History and Class Consciousness, p. 24, n. 6Google Scholar.

43 Lukács, G., The Young Hegel: Studies in the Relation Between Dialectics and Economics (Merlin: London, 1975)Google Scholar.

44 Lukács, , The Young Hegel, pp. 564–5Google Scholar.

45 Lukács, , The Young Hegel, pp. 72, 98 Google Scholar. See also p. 127.

46 Lukács, , The Young Hegel, p. 362 Google Scholar.

47 Lukács, , The Young Hegel, pp. 338 & 370 Google Scholar.

48 Lukács, , The Young Hegel, pp. 562 & 565 Google Scholar.

49 Lukács, , The Young Hegel, pp. 565 & 562Google Scholar.

50 Marcuse, H., Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977)Google Scholar.

51 Marcuse, , Reason and Revolution, p. 314 Google Scholar.

52 Marcuse, , Reason and Revolution, p. 60 Google Scholar.

53 Marcuse, , Reason and Revolution, p. 28 Google Scholar.

54 Marcuse, , Reason and Revolution, p. 184 Google Scholar.

55 Marcuse, , Reason and Revolution, p. 184 Google Scholar.

56 Marcuse, , Reason and Revolution, p. 258 Google Scholar.

57 Marcuse, , Reason and Revolution, p. 293 Google Scholar.

58 Coined by Arthur, C., ‘Review of Shamsavari's Dialectics and Social Theory: The Logic of Marx's Capital ’, Capital & Class, 50 (1993)Google Scholar. For the ‘new dialectics’ school, see Arthur, C., ‘Hegel's Logic and Marx's Capital ’, in Moseley, , ed., Marx's Method in Capital: A Reexamination (Humanities Press: New Jersey, 1993)Google Scholar; Reuten, G. & Williams, M., Value-Form and the State (London & New York: Routledge, 1989)Google Scholar; Shamsavari, A., Dialectics and Social Theory: The Logic of Capital (Braunton: Merlin, 1991)Google Scholar; Smith, T., The Logic of Marx's Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

59 Arthur, , ‘Review of Shamsavari's Dialectics and Social Theory’, p. 175 Google Scholar.

60 Arthur, , ‘Hegel's Logic and Marx's Capital’, pp. 65–6 & 71–2Google Scholar.

61 Arthur, , ‘Hegel's Logic and Marx's Capital’, p. 65 Google Scholar.

62 Arthur, , ‘Hegel's Logic and Marx's Capital’, pp. 63, 73 Google Scholar.

63 Smith, , The Logic of Marx's Capital, p. 40 Google Scholar.

64 McLellan, D., Marxism After Marx (London: Macmillan, 1979), p. 298 Google Scholar.

65 Althusser, L., For Marx (London: New Left Books, 1977)Google Scholar.

66 Althusser, L., Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, (New Left Books: London, 1971), p. 90 Google Scholar. McLellan, , Marxism After Marx, p. 299 Google Scholar. As Kolakowski wryly observes: ‘At this point we begin to wonder if Marxism existed at all in Marx's day, or whether it was left to Althusser to invent it’. Kolakowski, L., Main Currents of Marxism, Vol. III (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), p. 486 Google Scholar.

67 McLellan, , Marxism After Marx, pp. 299–302 Google Scholar; Callinicos, A., Marxism and Philosophy (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1985), pp. 90–5Google Scholar.

68 Althusser, , For Marx, p. 199 Google Scholar.

69 Althusser, , For Marx, pp. 199 & 231–2Google Scholar.

70 McLellan, , Marxism After Marx, p. 301 Google Scholar.

71 McLellan, , Marxism After Marx, p. 301 Google Scholar; Callinicos, , Marxism and Philosophy, p. 91 Google Scholar.

72 Callinicos, , Marxism and Philosophy, p. 91 Google Scholar.

73 McLellan, , Marxism After Marx, p. 302 Google Scholar.

74 Althusser, , For Marx, p. 113 Google Scholar.

75 Callinicos, , Marxism and Philosophy, p. 91 Google Scholar.

76 Althusser, L., Essays in Self-Criticism, (New Left Books: London, 1976), p. 96 Google Scholar.

77 K. Marx, , ‘Concerning Feuerbach’ in Marx, , Early Writings, p. 423 Google Scholar.

78 McLellan, , Marxism After Marx, p. 302 Google Scholar.

79 Callinicos, , Marxism and Philosophy, p. 92 Google Scholar.

80 This was further emphasised in the work of Lucio Colletti. See, for example, his Marxism and Hegel (New Left Books: London, 1973)Google Scholar.

81 Merquior, , Western Marxism, pp. 152–3Google Scholar; Kolakowski, , Main Currents of Marxism, Vol. III, p. 486 Google Scholar; McLellan, , Marxism After Marx, pp. 302–4Google Scholar. Even a sympathiser such as Callinicos ultimately refers to Althusser's contribution to Marxism as one of ‘destruction’; Callinicos, , Marxism and Philosophy, p. 95 Google Scholar. The recent posthumous publication of Althusser's early writings depicts Hegel far more sympathetically and emphasises the radical nature of Hegel's thought, ironically suggesting a ‘break’ between the writings of the ‘young’ Althusser compared to the ‘old’. See Althusser, L., The Spectre of Hegel: Early Writings (Verso: London & New York, 1997)Google Scholar.

82 Roemer, J., ed., Analytical Marxism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar.

83 Callinicos, A, ‘Introduction: Analytical Marxism” in Callinicos, A., ed., Marxist Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 5 Google Scholar.

84 Callinicos, , ‘Introduction: Analytical Marxism’, p. 5 Google Scholar.

85 Elster, J., Making Sense of Marx (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), p. 531 Google Scholar.

86 Carling, A., ‘Rational Choice Marxism’, New Left Review, 160 (November/December, 1986), pp. 26–7Google Scholar.

87 James, C.L.R., Notes on Dialectics (London: Allison & Busby, 1980)Google Scholar; Dunayevskaya, R., Philosophy and Revolution (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989)Google Scholar. Dunayevskaya's inclusion does require a caveat. Although she clearly interprets Hegel's dialectic as thoroughly materialist, she, almost paradoxically, still falls back into the materialist appropriation argument.

88 MacGregor, D., Hegel and Marx After the Fall of Communism (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1998)Google Scholar; MacGregor, D., The Communist Ideal in Hegel and Marx (London & Sydney: George Allen & Unwin, 1984)Google Scholar. Cf. Fraser, I., Hegel and Marx: The Concept of Need (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 Fraser, I., ‘Two of a Kind: Hegel, Marx, Dialectic and Form’, Capital & Class, 61, 1997 Google Scholar; Hegel and Marx: The Concept of Need, ch. 2.

90 James, , Notes on Dialectics, p. 57 Google Scholar.

91 James, , Notes on Dialectics, p. 29 Google Scholar.

92 James, , Notes on Dialectics, pp. 29 & 15Google Scholar.

93 MacGregor, , The Communist Ideal in Hegel and Marx, pp. 20–1Google Scholar.

94 MacGregor, , The Communist Ideal in Hegel and Marx, p. 21 Google Scholar.